Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of liver stiffness measurement with MRE and liver and spleen volumetry for prediction of disease severity and hepatic decompensation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and liver and spleen volumetry for prediction of disease severity and hepatic decompensation in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRE studies were reviewed, and mean LSM of entire liver, right lobe and left lobe, total liver, right lobe, left lobe, caudate lobe, and spleen volumes were calculated. Qualitative evaluation of lobar atrophy or hypertrophy and presence of macronodular regeneration (MNR) was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate correlations between LSM, volumetry measurements, and Mayo risk score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict hepatic decompensation.

Results

A total of 266 patients with PSC were included in the study. Lobar stiffness measures were higher in the presence of relative lobe atrophy. Mean LSM was higher in the presence of MNR. Significant correlations were observed between mean LSM and volumetry measurements with a fair correlation between LSM and spleen volume (rs = 0.526, p < 0.0001). Among the measurements, the best correlation was observed between mean LSM and Mayo risk score (rs = 0.646, p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analyses, mean LSM and Mayo risk score were significantly associated with liver decompensation (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95%CI 1.02–1.36 and hazard ratio, 1.65; 95%CI 1.08–2.53, respectively).

Conclusion

LSM with MRE performs significantly better than liver and spleen volumes for prediction of both disease severity and hepatic decompensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dyson JK, Beuers U, Jones DEJ, Lohse AW, Hudson M (2018) Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lancet 23;391:2547-2559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parola M, Pinzani M (2019) Liver fibrosis: Pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues. Mol Aspects Med 65:37-55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheuer PJ. Ludwig (1998) Symposium on biliary disorders—part II. Pathologic features and evolution of primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mayo Clinic Proc 73:179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eaton JE, Talwalkar JA, Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ, Lindor KD (2013) Pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis and advances in diagnosis and management. Gastroenterology 145:521-36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schramm C, Eaton J, Ringe KI, Venkatesh S, Yamamura J, MRI working group of the IPSCSG (2017) MRI working group of the IPSCSG. Recommendations on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in PSC-A position statement from the International PSC Study Group. Hepatology 66:1675–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kovač JD, Weber MA (2016) Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: an Update on MR Imaging Findings with Recent Developments. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 25:517-524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bader TR, Beavers KL, Semelka RC (2003) MR imaging features of primary sclerosing cholangitis: patterns of cirrhosis in relationship to clinical severity of disease. Radiology 226:675-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitzing YX, Whitley SA, Upponi SS, Srivastava B, Alexander GJ, Lomas DJ (2017) Association between progressive hepatic morphology changes on serial MR imaging and clinical outcome in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 61:636-642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khoshpouri P, Ameli S, Ghasabeh MA, Pandey A, Zarghampour M, Varzaneh FN, Jacob A, Pandey P, Luo Y, Kamel IR (2018) Correlation between quantitative liver and spleen volumes and disease severity in primary sclerosing cholangitis as determined by Mayo risk score. Eur J Radiol 108:254-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khoshpouri P, Hazhirkarzar B, Ameli S, Pandey A, Ghadimi M, Rezvani Habibabadi R, Aliyari Ghasabeh M, Pandey P, Shaghaghi M, Kamel IR (2019) Quantitative spleen and liver volume changes predict survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Radiol 74:734.e13-734.e20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jhaveri KS, Hosseini-Nik H, Sadoughi N, Janssen H, Feld JJ, Fischer S, Menezes R, Cheung AC (2019) The development and validation of magnetic resonance elastography for fibrosis staging in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Eur Radiol 29:1039-1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eaton JE, Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Smyrk TC, Gores GJ, Ehman RL, LaRusso NF, Gossard AA, Lazaridis KN (2016) Performance of magnetic resonance elastography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:1184-90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bookwalter CA, Venkatesh SK, Eaton JE, Smyrk TD, Ehman RL (2018) MR elastography in primary sclerosing cholangitis: correlating liver stiffness with bile duct strictures and parenchymal changes. Abdom Radiol 43:3260-3270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim WR, Therneau TM, Wiesner RH, Poterucha JJ, Benson JT, Malinchoc M, LaRusso NF, Lindor KD, Dickson ER (2000) A revised natural history model for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mayo Clin Proc 75:688-94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, D’Amico G, Dickson ER, Kim WR (2001) A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33:464-70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:544-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Manduca A, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2016) Automated liver elasticity calculation for MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1055-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aubé C (2015) Imaging modalities for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 39:38-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ehlken H, Wroblewski R, Corpechot C, Arrivé L, Rieger T, Hartl J, Lezius S, Hübener P, Schulze K, Zenouzi R, Sebode M, Peiseler M, Denzer UW, Quaas A, Weiler-Normann C, Lohse AW, Chazouilleres O, Schramm C (2016) Validation of Transient Elastography and Comparison with Spleen Length Measurement for Staging of Fibrosis and Clinical Prognosis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. PLoS One 10;11(10):e0164224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jung F, Cazzagon N, Vettorazzi E, Corpechot C, Chazouilleres O, Arrivé L, Lohse AW, Schramm C, Ehlken H (2019) Rate of Spleen Length Progression Is a Marker of Outcome in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Jan 4. pii: S1542-3565(19)30006-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.033. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Corpechot C, Gaouar F, El Naggar A, Kemgang A, Wendum D, Poupon R, Carrat F, Chazouillères O (2014) Baseline values and changes in liver stiffness measured by transient elastography are associated with severity of fibrosis and outcomes of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 146:970-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee DH, Lee JM, Chang W, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, Lee JH, Yu SJ, Han JK (2018) Prognostic Role of Liver Stiffness Measurements Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Patients with Compensated Chronic Liver Disease. Eur Radiol. 28:3513-3521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudhakar K. Venkatesh.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Sudhakar K Venkatesh, M.D. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Idilman, I.S., Low, H.M., Bakhshi, Z. et al. Comparison of liver stiffness measurement with MRE and liver and spleen volumetry for prediction of disease severity and hepatic decompensation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Abdom Radiol 45, 701–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02387-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02387-4

Keywords

Navigation