Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Size threshold for follow-up of postmenopausal adnexal cysts: 1 cm versus 3 cm

  • Practice
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess 3 cm size threshold for follow-up of simple cysts in postmenopausal women.

Materials and methods

Radiology information system was retrospectively queried for “US pelvis complete” over 8 years in women > 50 years, with keywords ovarian cyst, adnexal cyst, ovarian mass, cystic mass, cystic neoplasm, ovarian neoplasm, and ovarian mass. Premenopausal women were excluded. Cysts, were classified as ≤ 1 cm, 1–3 cm, 3–5 cm, and ≥ 7 cm. Largest cysts on each ovary was recorded. EMR and imaging archives were reviewed for assessing size, stability duration, and surgical records. Descriptive statistics and confidence interval were performed.

Results

4388 patients met the initial search criteria. 919 cysts in 896 women (age: 50–91 years, mean: 61.5 years) were identified. We found 162 cysts ≤ 1 cm, 352 1–3 cm, 296 3–7 cm , and 51 ≥ 7 cm cysts. 127 patients with 1–3 cm cysts had no follow-up. Final analysis of 225 1–3 cm cysts included 203 ovarian and 22 paraovarian cysts (average size = 1.95 cm (1.1–3.0 cm)). 103 ovarian cysts had less than 2 years, and 100 cysts had more than 2 years follow-up. All except one ovarian cyst were stable for the entire duration of their follow-up (Mean duration of follow-up 5.4 years) (0.3%, 95% CI 0.0–0.05). 40 cysts resolved. One simple cyst increased in size (followed over 3.25 years) without suspicious imaging features and benign on surgery.

Conclusion

1–3 cm cysts represented the most common size range (> 40%) in postmenopausal women, majority of which are stable over follow-up with benign outcome. 3 cm size threshold is appropriate for simple cyst follow-up in postmenopausal women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levine, D., et al., Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Ultrasound Q, 2010. 26(3): p. 121–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maturen, K.E., et al., Risk Stratification of Adnexal Cysts and Cystic Masses: Clinical Performance of Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines. Radiology, 2017. 285(2): p. 650–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Healy, D.L., et al., Ovarian status in healthy postmenopausal women. Menopause, 2008. 15(6): p. 1109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine, D., et al., Simple adnexal cysts: the natural history in postmenopausal women. Radiology, 1992. 184(3): p. 653–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boos, J., et al., Ovarian Cancer: Prevalence in Incidental Simple Adnexal Cysts Initially Identified in CT Examinations of the Abdomen and Pelvis. Radiology, 2018. 286(1): p. 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Valentin, L., et al., Risk of malignancy in unilocular cysts: a study of 1148 adnexal masses classified as unilocular cysts at transvaginal ultrasound and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013. 41(1): p. 80–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekerhovd, E., et al., Preoperative assessment of unilocular adnexal cysts by transvaginal ultrasonography: a comparison between ultrasonographic morphologic imaging and histopathologic diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001. 184(2): p. 48–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andreotti, R.F., et al., Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for Ultrasound: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. J Am Coll Radiol, 2018. 15(10): p. 1415–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Expert Panel on Women’s, I., et al., ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms. J Am Coll Radiol, 2019. 16(5S): p. S77–S93.

  10. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting & Data System. 2019 [cited 2019 May 22nd]; Available from: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/O-Rads.

  11. O-RADS Risk Stratification System Table 2019 [cited 2019 May 22nd]; Available from: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/O-RADS/O-RADS_Table-2-Risk-Stratification.pdf?la=en.

  12. Patel, M.D., et al., Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, part 1: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on adnexal findings. J Am Coll Radiol, 2013. 10(9): p. 675–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Timmerman, D., et al., Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000. 16(5): p. 500–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Timmerman, D., et al., Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 31(6): p. 681–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Timmerman, D., et al., Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016. 214(4): p. 424–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenkrantz, A.B. and A.S. Kierans, US of incidental adnexal cysts: adherence of radiologists to the 2010 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound guidelines. Radiology, 2014. 271(1): p. 262–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Castillo, G., J.L. Alcazar, and M. Jurado, Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol, 2004. 92(3): p. 965–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baheti, A.D., et al., Adnexal lesions detected on CT in postmenopausal females with non-ovarian malignancy: do simple cysts need follow-up? Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019. 44(2): p. 661–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parazzini, F., et al., The limited oncogenic potential of unilocular adnexal cysts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018. 225: p. 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith-Bindman, R., et al., Risk of Malignant Ovarian Cancer Based on Ultrasonography Findings in a Large Unselected Population. JAMA Intern Med, 2019. 179(1): p. 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dehari, R., et al., The development of high-grade serous carcinoma from atypical proliferative (borderline) serous tumors and low-grade micropapillary serous carcinoma: a morphologic and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Surg Pathol, 2007. 31(7): p. 1007–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murali, R., et al., Somatic genetic alterations in synchronous and metachronous low-grade serous tumours and high-grade carcinomas of the adnexa. Histopathology, 2019. 74(4): p. 638–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baheti, A.D., et al., Imaging characterization of adnexal lesions: Do CT findings correlate with US? Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018. 43(7): p. 1764–1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Ovarian Cancer. 2019; Available from https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA, 94131, USA

    Priyanka Jha, Mallika Shekhar, Ruth Goldstein, Tara Morgan & Liina Poder

Authors
  1. Priyanka Jha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mallika Shekhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruth Goldstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tara Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liina Poder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priyanka Jha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jha, P., Shekhar, M., Goldstein, R. et al. Size threshold for follow-up of postmenopausal adnexal cysts: 1 cm versus 3 cm. Abdom Radiol 45, 3213–3217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02176-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02176-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation