Skip to main content

Society of abdominal radiology gastrointestinal bleeding disease-focused panel consensus recommendations for CTA technical parameters in the evaluation of acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding

Abstract

Purpose

To formulate consensus recommendations for CT angiography technical parameters used to evaluate overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.

Methods

An electronic questionnaire consisting of 17 questions was sent to a panel of 16 radiologists with expertise on the imaging of GI bleeding from the Society of Abdominal Radiology GI Bleeding disease-focused panel to obtain consensus agreement on issues related to CTA technical parameters for imaging overt GI bleeding. A multi-round Delphi method of voting was performed to obtain consensus which was defined as ≥ 80% agreement.

Results

Consensus agreement was reached in 15/17 (89%) of the questions including the technique for the administration of IV contrast, the number of phases, scan timing, and image reconstruction.

Conclusions

A panel of experts on the imaging of GI bleeding from the Society of Abdominal Radiology was able to reach consensus on the majority of technical parameters used for CTA of overt GI bleeding. These recommendations should improve the quality of patient care by adopting these minimal technical requirements for optimal exam performance and lead to less variation in the performance of these exams which will facilitate collecting and comparing published data from different centers. These recommendations will need revisions as additional scientific data become available.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. He, B., et al., Diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding by multi-slice CT angiography: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Radiology, 2017. 93: p. 40-45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foley, P.T., et al., Multi-detector CT angiography for lower gastrointestinal bleeding: Can it select patients for endovascular intervention? Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology, 2010. 54(1): p. 9-16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacovides, C.L., et al., Arteriography for Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Role of Preceding Abdominal Computed Tomographic Angiogram in Diagnosis and Localization. JAMA Surgery, 2015. 150(7): p. 650-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marti, M., et al., Acute lower intestinal bleeding: feasibility and diagnostic performance of CT angiography. Radiology, 2012. 262(1): p. 109-16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagata, N., et al., Role of urgent contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing early colonoscopy. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015. 50(12): p. 1162-72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ren, J.Z., et al., Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: role of 64-row computed tomographic angiography in diagnosis and therapeutic planning. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015. 21(13): p. 4030-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zink, S.I., et al., Noninvasive evaluation of active lower gastrointestinal bleeding: comparison between contrast-enhanced MDCT and 99mTc-labeled RBC scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008. 191(4): p. 1107-14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, S., C.J. Welman, and D. Ramsay, Investigation of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding with 16- and 64-slice multidetector CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2009. 53(1): p. 56-63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Saeed, O., et al., Sixty-four multi-detector computerised tomography in the detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2011. 55(3): p. 252-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ernst, O., et al., Helical CT in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur Radiol, 2003. 13(1): p. 114-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabharwal, R., et al., Helical CT in the diagnosis of acute lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Eur J Radiol, 2006. 58(2): p. 273-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Palma J, M.M., Pilleul F, Multidetector computed tomography in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Reports in Medical Imaging, 2010. 3: p. 107-113.

  13. Tew, K., et al., MDCT of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004. 182(2): p. 427-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamaguchi, T. and K. Yoshikawa, Enhanced CT for initial localization of active lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Abdom Imaging, 2003. 28(5): p. 634-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El Sayed, R.F., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol, 2017. 27(5): p. 2067-2085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor, S.A., et al., The first joint ESGAR/ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging. Eur Radiol, 2017. 27(6): p. 2570-2582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, H., et al., Dual-source dual-energy CT angiography with virtual non-enhanced images and iodine map for active gastrointestinal bleeding: image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic performance. European Journal of Radiology, 2015. 84(5): p. 884-91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, H., et al., Dual-source dual-energy computed tomography angiography for active gastrointestinal bleeding: a preliminary study. Clinical Radiology, 2013. 68(2): p. 139-47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, J.W., et al., Diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal bleeding: comparison of the arterial, the portal, and the combined set using 64-section computed tomography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2011. 35(2): p. 206-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shotar, E., et al., Diagnosis of acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding with CT-angiography: Comparison of the diagnostic performance of individual acquisition phases. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 2017. 98(12): p. 857-863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff L. Fidler.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 18 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fidler, J.L., Gunn, M.L., Soto, J.A. et al. Society of abdominal radiology gastrointestinal bleeding disease-focused panel consensus recommendations for CTA technical parameters in the evaluation of acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Abdom Radiol 44, 2957–2962 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02131-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02131-y

Keywords

  • Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
  • Computed tomography angiography
  • Colon
  • Intestine
  • Small