Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the detectability of renal stones in corticomedullary and nephrographic phases on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).
Methods
All consecutive patients between January 2012 and February 2016 undergoing CT of the kidneys according to our department’s standard four-phase protocol and having at least one stone in the NC-phase (NCP) were included. Fifty patients with altogether 136 stones were eligible. Two radiologists in consensus evaluated the NCP from each examination and documented the number, location, and size of stones. Three abdominal radiologists blinded to the findings of the NCP reviewed independently the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases on two different occasions. They reported the number and location of stones in each kidney. For the inter-observer agreement the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated. The detection rate of renal stones was calculated for the three radiologists and compared between the two contrast-enhanced phases and the results were analyzed with concern to the size of the stones.
Results
The ICC was 0.86. There was no statistically significant difference between corticomedullary and nephrographic phases (p = 0.94). The detection rate for stones measuring 3–5 mm was 82–88% and 98% for stones ≥ 6 mm.
Conclusion
The detectability of renal stones ≥ 6 mm on contrast-enhanced CT is extremely high. This means that stones with a higher risk of not passing spontaneously can be safely diagnosed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- CE:
-
Contrast-enhanced
- CEP:
-
Contrast-enhanced phases
- CM:
-
Contrast media
- CMP:
-
Corticomedullary phase
- DE-CT:
-
Dual-energy CT
- EP:
-
Excretory phase
- ICC:
-
Intra-class correlation coefficient
- IV:
-
Intravenous
- I:
-
Iodine
- MDCT:
-
Multidetector computed tomography
- NGP:
-
Nephrographic phase
- NC:
-
Non-contrast
- NCP:
-
Non-contrast phase
References
Kawamoto S, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2008) Detection of renal calculi on late arterial phase computed tomography images: are noncontrast scans always needed to detect renal calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:859–864
Cheng PM, Moin P, Dunn MD, et al. (2012) What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 1—pathogenesis, types, assessment, and variant anatomy. AJR 198:540–547
Furlan A, Federle MP, Yealy DM, et al. (2008) Nonobstructing renal stones on unenhanced CT: a real cause for renal colic? AJR 190:125–127
Dym RJ, Duncan DR, Spektor M, et al. (2014) Renal stones on portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT: does intravenous contrast interfere with detection? Abdom Imaging 39:526–532
Brandt B, Ostri P, Lange P, et al. (1993) Painful caliceal calculi. The treatment of small nonobstructing caliceal calculi in patients with symptoms. Scand J Urol Nephrol 27:75–76
Cheng PM, Moin P, Dunn MD, et al. (2012) What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 2—CT findings, reporting, and treatment. AJR 198:548–554
Renard-Penna R, Martin A, Conort P, et al. (2015) Kidney stones and imaging: what can your radiologist do for you? World J Urol 33:193–202
Rucker CM, Menias CO, Bhalla S (2004) Mimics of renal colic: alternative diagnoses at unenhanced helical CT. Radiographics 24:11–33
Eisner BH, McQuaid JW, Hyams E, et al. (2011) Nephrolithiasis: what surgeons need to know. AJR 196:1274–1278
Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194:789–794
Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke A, et al. (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 13:2513–2520
Bland MJ, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical assessment. The Lancet 327:307–310
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428
Cicchetti Domenic V (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290
Jura YH, Lahey S, Eisner BH, et al. (2013) Ureteroscopic treatment of patients with small, painful, non-obstructing renal stones: the small stone syndrome. Clin Nephrol 79:45–49
Corwin MT, Lee JS, Fananapazir G, et al. (2016) Detection of renal stones on portal venous phase CT: comparison of thin axial and coronal maximum-intensity-projection images. AJR 207:1200–1204
Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A, et al. (2010) Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology 256:184–190
Mangold S, Thomas C, Fenchel M, et al. (2012) Virtual nonenhanced dual-energy CT urography with tin-filter technology: determinants of detection of urinary calculi in the renal collecting system. Radiology 264:119–125
Acknowledgements
Per Näsman, Center for Safety Research, Department of Transport Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Not available.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Odenrick, A., Kartalis, N., Voulgarakis, N. et al. The role of contrast-enhanced computed tomography to detect renal stones. Abdom Radiol 44, 652–660 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1778-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1778-7