Virtual monoenergetic imaging in rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT (DECT) of the abdomen: impact on CT texture analysis
- 12 Downloads
To study the impact of keV levels of virtual monoenergetic images generated from rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT) on CT texture analysis (CTTA).
This study included 30 consecutive patients (59.3 ± 12 years; range 34–77 years; 17M:13F) who underwent portal venous phase abdominal CT on a rsDECT scanner. Axial 5-mm monoenergetic images at 5 energy levels (40/50/60/70/80 keV) were created and CTTA of liver was performed. CTTA comprised a filtration-histogram technique with different spatial scale filter (SSF) values (0–6). CTTA quantification at each SSF value included histogram-based statistical parameters such as mean intensity, standard deviation (SD), entropy, mean of positive pixels (MPP), skewness, and kurtosis. The values were compared using repeated measures ANOVA.
Among the different CTTA metrics, mean intensity (at SSF > 0), skewness, and kurtosis did not show variability whereas entropy, MPP, and SD varied with different keV levels. There was no change in skewness and kurtosis values for all 6 filters (p > 0.05). Mean intensity showed no change for filters 2–6 (p > 0.05). Mean intensity at SSF = 0 i.e., mean attenuations were 91.2 ± 2.9, 108.7 ± 3.6, 136.1 ± 4.7, 179.8 ± 6.9, and 250.5 ± 10.1 HU for 80, 70, 60, 50, and 40 keV images, respectively demonstrating significant variability (decrease) with increasing keV levels (p < 0.001). Entropy, MPP, and SD values showed a statistically significant decrease with increasing keV of monoenergetic images on all 6 filters (p < 0.001).
The energy levels of monoenergetic images have variable impact on the different CTTA parameters, with no significant change in skewness, kurtosis, and filtered mean intensity whereas significant decrease in mean attenuation, entropy, MPP, and SD values with increasing energy levels.
KeywordsDual energy CT CT texture analysis Virtual monoenergetic imaging
Compliance with ethical standards
Balaji Ganeshan: director, part-time employee, and shareholder of Feedback Plc (Cambridge, England, UK), company that develops and markets the TexRAD texture analysis algorithm described in this manuscript. Dushyant Sahani: GE healthcare research grant, royalties from Elsevier.
This study was not funded.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
Balaji Ganeshan is director, part-time employee, and shareholder of Feedback Plc (Cambridge, England, UK), company that develops and markets the TexRAD texture analysis algorithm described in this manuscript. Dushyant Sahani has GE healthcare research grant, royalties from Elsevier, other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Ganeshan B, Miles KA (2013) Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT. Cancer Imaging Off Publ Int Cancer Imaging Soc. 26(13):140–149Google Scholar
- 16.Ganeshan B, Abaleke S, Young RCD, Chatwin CR, Miles KA (2010) Texture analysis of non-small cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: initial evidence for a relationship with tumour glucose metabolism and stage. Cancer Imaging Off Publ Int Cancer Imaging Soc. 6(10):137–143Google Scholar
- 31.Wu J, Gong G, Cui Y, Li R (2016) Intratumor partitioning and texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI identifies relevant tumor subregions to predict pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 44(5):1107–1115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Parakh A, Patino M, Sahani DV. Spectral CT/dual-energy CT. In Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017 [cited 2017 Apr 3]. p. 1–21. (Medical Radiology). http://link.springer.com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/chapter/10.1007/174_2017_28
- 40.Miles KA, Ganeshan B, Hayball MP (2013) CT texture analysis using the filtration-histogram method: what do the measurements mean? Cancer Imaging Off Publ Int Cancer Imaging Soc. 13(3):400–406Google Scholar
- 41.Hsu CC-T, Kwan GNC, Singh D, Pratap J, Watkins TW. Principles and clinical application of dual-energy computed tomography in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. J Clin Imaging Sci [Internet]. 2016 Jun 29 [cited 2017 Jun 14];6. : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964665/
- 43.Roele ED, Timmer VCML, Vaassen LAA, van Kroonenburgh AMJL, Postma AA. Dual-energy CT in head and neck imaging. Curr Radiol Rep [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 14];5(5). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371622/
- 44.Liguori C, Frauenfelder G, Massaroni C, et al. (2015) Emerging clinical applications of computed tomography. Med Devices Auckl NZ. 5(8):265–278Google Scholar