Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applicability of current NCCN Guidelines for pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability: analysis and pitfalls

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To test the applicability of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN v 3.2017) resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in clinical practice, at a high-volume tertiary referral center.

Materials and methods

102 consecutive patients (53 female; mean age 66.2 years, range 34–90 years) with biopsy proven, non-metastatic PDAC were evaluated by our multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer program between July 2013 and February 2016. Retrospective review of staging pancreatic CT angiography was performed, and radiographic features were categorized as conforming to or non-conforming to existing v 3.2017 definitions.

Results

Among 102 patients, 10 (10%) had CTA evidence of vascular involvement that did not conform to existing NCCN Guidelines. Six new scenarios of vascular involvement were identified. The remaining 92 patients presented with resectable (n = 20 [22%]), borderline resectable (n = 42 [45.6%]), or unresectable (n = 30 [33%]) PDAC. Approximately half (n = 21 [51%]) of borderline resectable patients’ tumors demonstrated isolated venous involvement, whereas 39% had both arterial and venous involvement. A minority (11%) demonstrated only major arterial involvement. Assignment to unresectable status reflected both arterial and venous involvement (11, 37%), arterial involvement only (10, 33%) patients, and unreconstructible venous involvement in 9 (30%).

Conclusion

In our experience, current NCCN resectability guidelines for PDAC do not accurately classify vascular involvement identified in approximately 10% of patients. Revision of the current guidelines could be helpful to clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin D, Bray F (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 7 July 2017

  2. American Cancer Society (2014) Pancreatic cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/pancreatic-cancer.html. Accessed 7 July 2017

  3. Tempero MA, Arnoletti JP, Behrman S, et al. (2010) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 8:972–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong JC, Raman S (2010) Surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CTA. Abdom Imaging 35:471–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9539-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. NCCN Guidelines version 3.2017 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed 7 July 2017

  6. NCCN Guidelines® & Clinical Resources (2017) Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/development.aspx. Accessed 10 Dec 2017

  7. Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270:248–260. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Camacho A, Fang J, Cohen MP, et al. (2017) Split-bolus pancreas CTA protocol for local staging of pancreatic cancer and detection and characterization of liver lesions. Abdom Radiol . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1350-x

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brook OR, Gourtsoyianni S, Brook A, et al. (2013) Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT of the pancreas: assessment of radiation dose and tumor conspicuity. Radiology 269:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Behrman SW, et al. (2008) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12(8):1083–1093. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2014.0106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Heinemann V, et al. (2014) Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:396–402. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0396

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Uemoto S (2004) Classification of pancreatic cancer: comparison of Japanese and UICC classifications. Pancreas 28:231–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D, et al. (2011) Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg 98:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aosasa S, Nishikawa M, Noro T, et al. (2016) Total pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection and hepatic artery restoration using splenic artery autograft interposition. J Gastrointest Surg 20:644–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2991-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N, et al. (2009) Is pancreatectomy with arterial reconstruction a safe and useful procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:850–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0190-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zakharova OP, Karmazanovsky GG, Egorov VI (2012) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: outstanding problems. World J Gastrointest Surg 27(5):104–113. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v4.i5.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Garces-Descovich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were by the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garces-Descovich, A., Beker, K., Jaramillo-Cardoso, A. et al. Applicability of current NCCN Guidelines for pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability: analysis and pitfalls. Abdom Radiol 43, 314–322 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1459-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1459-6

Keywords

Navigation