Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

LI-RADS: a glimpse into the future

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a glimpse into the future of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), discussing the immediate and long-term plans for its continuing improvement and expansion. To complement the Core and Essentials components of the latest version of LI-RADS, a comprehensive manual will be released soon, and it will include technical recommendations, management guidance, as well as reporting instructions and templates. In this article, we briefly review the process by which LI-RADS has been developed until now, a process guided by a variable combination of data, expert opinion, and desire for congruency with other diagnostic systems in North America. We then look forward, envisioning that forthcoming updates to LI-RADS will occur regularly every 3 to 5 years, driven by emerging high-quality scientific evidence. We highlight some of the key knowledge and technology gaps that will need to be addressed to enable the needed refinements. We also anticipate future expansions in scope to meet currently unaddressed clinical needs. Finally, we articulate a vision for eventual unification of imaging system for HCC screening and surveillance, diagnosis and staging, and treatment response assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AASLD:

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

CEUS:

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

CT:

Computed tomography

ECA:

Extracellular agents

ICC:

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

HBA:

Hepatobiliary agents

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

LI-RADS:

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OPTN:

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network

References

  1. American College of Radiology (2017) Liver imaging reporting and data system. Latest version retrieved from http://www.acr.org/quality-safety/resources/LIRADS

  2. OPaTN (2017) OPTN/UNOS policy 9: allocation of livers and liver-intestines. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/ContentDocuments/OPTN_Policies.pdf-nameddest=Policy_09. Accessed 4 Mar 2017

  3. Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Darnell A, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. (2015) Liver imaging reporting and data system with MR imaging: evaluation in nodules 20 mm or smaller detected in cirrhosis at screening US. Radiology 275:698–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim TK, Lee KH, Jang HJ, et al. (2011) Analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR findings for characterizing small (1–2-cm) hepatic nodules in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 259:730–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang A, Cruite I, Mitchell DG, Sirlin CB (2017) Hepatocellular carcinoma imaging systems: why they exist, how they have evolved, and how they differ. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1292-3

    Google Scholar 

  7. Han KH, Kim DY, Park JY, et al. (2013) Survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients may be improved in surveillance interval not more than 6 months compared with more than 6 months: a 15-year prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol 47:538–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Santi V, Trevisani F, Gramenzi A, et al. (2010) Semiannual surveillance is superior to annual surveillance for the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma and patient survival. J Hepatol 53:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trevisani F, De Notariis S, Rapaccini G, et al. (2002) Semiannual and annual surveillance of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma: effects on cancer stage and patient survival (Italian experience). Am J Gastroenterol 97:734–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanabe M, Kanki A, Wolfson T, et al. (2016) Imaging outcomes of liver imaging reporting and data system version 2014 category 2, 3, and 4 observations detected at CT and MR imaging. Radiology 281:129–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santillan C, Fowler K, Kono Y, Chernyak V (2017) LI-RADS major features: CT, MRI with extracellular agents, and MRI with hepatobiliary agents. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1291-4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cruite I, Santillan C, Mamidipalli A, et al. (2016) Liver imaging reporting and data system: review of ancillary imaging features. Semin Roentgenol 51:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chernyak V, Tang A, Flusberg M, et al. (2017) LI-RADS(R) ancillary features on CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1220-6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude B. Sirlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sirlin, C.B., Kielar, A.Z., Tang, A. et al. LI-RADS: a glimpse into the future. Abdom Radiol 43, 231–236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1448-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1448-1

Keywords

Navigation