Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 42, Issue 11, pp 2591–2596 | Cite as

Quantitative assessment of the degree of differentiation in colon cancer with dual-energy spectral CT

  • Yang Chuang-bo
  • He Tai-ping
  • Duan Hai-feng
  • Jia Yong-jun
  • Zhang Xi-rong
  • Ma Guang-ming
  • Ren Chenglong
  • Wang Jun
  • Yu YongEmail author



To evaluate dual-energy spectral CT imaging in evaluating the degree of differentiation in colon cancer.


Forty-seven colon cancer patients underwent spectral CT during arterial phase (AP) and portal venous phase (PP), and were characterized pathologically differentiated to well-differentiated (A, n = 18) and poorly differentiated or undifferentiated carcinoma group (B, n = 29). Lesion iodine concentration (IC) was measured and normalized to that of aorta (NIC). CT numbers were measured and the slope (λ HU) of the spectral HU curve was calculated. These parameters were statistically compared between the two groups. ROC curves were used to evaluate their diagnostic efficacies.


There were significant differences in IC (1.01 ± 0.20 vs. 1.59 ± 0.57 mg/ml), NIC (0.12 ± 0.03 vs. 0.19 ± 0.09), λ HU (1.41 ± 0.29 vs. 2.03 ± 0.85), and CT number at 70 keV (48.61 ± 9.03HU vs. 63.97 ± 15.86HU) between groups A and B in AP (p < 0.05), but no difference in PP. Using IC = 1.13 mg/ml in AP as the threshold, one obtained a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 71.4% for differentiating well-differentiated from poorly differentiated or undifferentiated carcinoma. These values were statistically higher than those (64.7% and 62.3%) using CT number at 70 keV.


Spectral CT imaging parameters (IC, NIC, and λ HU) in AP provide improved accuracy for evaluating the degrees of differentiation in colon cancer than CT number at 70 keV.


Tomography X-ray computed Dual-energy CT Colon cancer Tissue differentiation 



The authors would like to thank Dr Jianying Li and Dr Yun Shen for excellent technical support and for critically reviewing the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards


No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L (2010) European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. 1st edtion. European Commission, Brussels: World Health Organization, 16-17.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer Clin. 61:69–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gollub MJ, Schwartz LH, Akhurst T (2007) Update on colorectal cancer Imaging. Radiol Clin N Am. 45(1):85–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Linuma G, Miyake M, Arai Y, et al. (2008) CT colonography—towards applications for colorectal cancer screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 9(4):833–840Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen J, Jurik AG (2009) Analysis of current practice of CT examinations. Acta Oncol. 48(2):295–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsumoto K, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, et al. (2011) Virtual monochromatic spectral Imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtain with conventional 120kVp CT. Radiology 259(1):257–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao LQ, He W, Li JY, et al. (2011) Improving image quality in portal venography with spectral CT imaging. Eur J Radiol. 81(8):1677–1681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lv P, Lin XZ, Li J, et al. (2011) Differentiation of small hepatic hemangioma from small hepatocellular carcinoma: recently introduced spectral CT method. Radiology 259(3):720–729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang XF, Lu Q, Wu LM, et al. (2013) Quantitative iodine-based material decomposition images with spectral CT imaging for differentiating prostatic carcinoma from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Acad Radiol. 20(8):947–956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Broders AC (1921) Squamous-cell epithelioma of the skin: a study of 256 cases. Ann Surg. 73:141–160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Potretzke TA, Brace CL, Lubner MG, et al. (2014) Early small-bowel ischemia: dual-energy CT Improves conspicuity compared with conventional CT in a Swine model. Radiology 275(1):119–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A, et al. (2010) Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology 256(1):184–190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pache G, Krauss B, Strohm P, et al. (2010) Dual-energy CT virtual noncalcium technique: detecting posttraumatic bone marrow lesions—feasibility study. Radiology 256(2):617–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Linder JD, Geenen JE, Catalano MF (2006) Cyst fluid analysis obtained by EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of discrete cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: a prospective single-center experience. Gastrointest Endos. 64:697–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin XZ, Miao F, Li J, et al. (2011) High-definition CT Gemstone spectral imaging of the brain: initial results of selecting optimal monochromatic image for beam-hardening artifacts and image noise reduction. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 35(2):294–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. (2010) Focal cystic high-attenuation lesion: characterization in renal phantom by using photon-counting spectral CT-improved differentiation of lesion composition. Radiology 254(1):270–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang D, Li X, Liu B (2011) Objective characterization of GE discovery CT750 scanner: gemstone spectral imaging mode. Med Phys. 38(3):1178–1188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. (2007) Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 17(6):1510–1517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Passariello R (2004) Multislice CT angiography of mesenteric vessels. Abdom Imaging 29(2):146–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Du JR, Jiang Y, Zhang YM, et al. (2003) Vascular endothelial growth factor and microvascular density in esophageal and gastric carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol. 9(7):1604–1606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weidner N (2004) The importance of tumor angiogenesis: the evidence continues to growth. Am J Clin Pathol 122(5):675–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim SJ, Lee KK, Kim DG (2010) Tumor size predicts the biological behavior and influence of operative modalities in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 57:121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pang LF, Zhang H, Lu W, et al. (2013) Spectral CT imaging of myocardial infarction: preliminary animal experience. Eur Radiol. 23(1):133–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ej Moding, Clark DP, Qi Y, et al. (2013) Dual-energy micro-computed tomography imaging of radiation-induced vascular changes in primary mouse sarcomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 85(5):1353–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hamberg LM, et al. (2005) Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observation. Radiology 234:785–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Chuang-bo
    • 1
  • He Tai-ping
    • 1
  • Duan Hai-feng
    • 1
  • Jia Yong-jun
    • 1
  • Zhang Xi-rong
    • 1
  • Ma Guang-ming
    • 1
  • Ren Chenglong
    • 1
  • Wang Jun
    • 2
  • Yu Yong
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyAffiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese MedicineXianyangChina
  2. 2.Department of PathologyAffiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese MedicineXianyangChina

Personalised recommendations