Abstract
Purpose
To determine if and when fetal structures are identifiable during first trimester pregnancy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women with acute abdominopelvic pain.
Methods
Sixty-four first trimester MRI examinations performed for evaluation of abdominopelvic pain were reviewed retrospectively. T2-weighted images were assessed independently by three radiologists for the presence of gestational sac, yolk sac, fetal pole, and limb buds. Mean sac diameter and sac volume were determined, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Criterion values for fetal structures and gestational sac size were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Results
A gestational sac is present in all but two cases. The yolk sac is never identified. A fetal pole is identified at a gestational age (GA), mean sac diameter (MSD), and gestational sac volume (GSV) of greater than 6.4 weeks, 1.7 cm, and 8.9 mL, respectively. Limb buds are identified at a GA, MSD, and GSV of greater than 8.1 weeks, 3.4 cm, and 27.1 mL, respectively. There is a significant correlation between GA and gestational sac size, including the MSD (r 2 = 0.85, P < 0.01) and GSV (r 2 = 0.86, P < 0.01).
Conclusions
The gestational sac is readily demonstrated on T2-weighted images, but the yolk sac is not identified on routine MRI. The fetal pole and limb buds are seen on MRI at a similar GA and MSD as with published values using transvaginal sonography.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen B, Nielsen TF (1999) Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78(9):758–762
Plunk MR, Chapman T (2014) The fundamentals of fetal MR imaging: Part 1. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 43(6):331–346. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.05.014
Plunk MR, Chapman T (2014) The fundamentals of fetal magnetic resonance imaging: Part 2. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 43(6):347–355. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.05.010
Parker RA, 3rd, Yano M, Tai AW, et al. (2012) MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial review. Radiographics 32(5):1445–1460; discussion 1460–1442. doi:10.1148/rg.325115153
Blaas HG (2014) Detection of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 28(3):341–353. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.11.004
Bree RL, Edwards M, Bohm-Velez M, et al. (1989) Transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of normal early pregnancy: correlation with HCG level. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153(1):75–79. doi:10.2214/ajr.153.1.75
Goldstein I, Zimmer EA, Tamir A, Peretz BA, Paldi E (1991) Evaluation of normal gestational sac growth: appearance of embryonic heartbeat and embryo body movements using the transvaginal technique. Obstet Gynecol 77(6):885–888
Kent AL, Jyoti R, Robertson C, et al. (2010) Are renal volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional ultrasound in the term neonate comparable? Pediatr Nephrol 25(5):913–918. doi:10.1007/s00467-009-1414-4
Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, et al. (2013) Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med 369(15):1443–1451. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1302417
Takeuchi H (1992) Transvaginal ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 29(1–3):381–384
Fujiwaki R, Hata T, Hata K, Kitao M (1995) Intrauterine ultrasonographic assessments of embryonic development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(6):1770–1774
Coakley FV, Glenn OA, Qayyum A, et al. (2004) Fetal MRI: a developing technique for the developing patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(1):243–252. doi:10.2214/ajr.182.1.1820243
Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Bharatha A, Montanera WJ, Park AL (2016) Association between MRI exposure during pregnancy and fetal and childhood outcomes. JAMA 316(9):952–961. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12126
Grisolia G, Milano K, Pilu G, et al. (1993) Biometry of early pregnancy with transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3(6):403–411. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1993.03060403.x
Bagratee JS, Regan L, Khullar V, Connolly C, Moodley J (2009) Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac and embryo volumes using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(5):503–509. doi:10.1002/uog.7348
Odeh M, Hirsh Y, Degani S, Grinin V, Ofir E, Bornstein J (2008) Three-dimensional sonographic volumetry of the gestational sac and the amniotic sac in the first trimester. J Ultrasound Med 27(3):373–378
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Viets, Z.J., Raptis, C.A., Fowler, K.J. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of first trimester pregnancy: expected intrauterine contents in relation to gestational age. Abdom Radiol 42, 2334–2339 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1120-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1120-9