Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic resonance findings of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: emphasis on hepatobiliary phase using Gd-EOB-DTPA

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the characteristic features of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Material and methods

Twelve patients (mean age, 50 years; male:female = 6:6) who were pathologically confirmed to have HEH in two tertiary institutions were retrospectively investigated. For qualitative analysis, the MRI features of HEH including core pattern were characterized, and lesions were divided into core and non-core groups. For quantitative analysis, standardized mean signal intensities (SIst) measured at the tumor center, periphery, and liver parenchyma were plotted against the dynamic phases. Differences in SIst between the core and non-core group were calculated for the tumor center and periphery. We also examined the radiologic and pathologic correlation for cases in which surgical resection was performed.

Results

Forty-seven nodules in 12 patients were analyzed. The mean size of the lesions was 2.9 ± 1.0 cm. In the per-lesion analysis, ring-like arterial enhancement (74%) on arterial phase was the most frequent feature, followed by core pattern (51%), and hyperintense rim on T1-weighted imaging (43%). In the per-patient analysis, capsular retraction (75%) was the most common sign. The percentage of patients with core pattern was 58%. In the core group, the SIst of the center showed slow enhancement starting from the transitional phase, resulting in divergence between the two graphs throughout the entire dynamic study (p < 0.05). Pathologically, the lesion center consisted of reduced cellularity with myxohyaline stroma and necrosis.

Conclusion

Core pattern can be considered a new diagnostic sign of HEH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Fonouni H, et al. (2006) Primary malignant hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a comprehensive review of the literature with emphasis on the surgical therapy. Cancer 107:2108–2121. doi:10.1002/cncr.22225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi KH, Moon WS (2013) Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver. Clin Mol Hepatol 19:315–319. doi:10.3350/cmh.2013.19.3.315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyburn ID, Torreggiani WC, Harris AC, et al. (2003) Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: sonographic, CT, and MR imaging appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1359–1364. doi:10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruegel M, Muenzel D, Waldt S, Specht K, Rummeny EJ (2011) Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: findings at CT and MRI including preliminary observations at diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging. Abdom Imaging 36:415–424. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9641-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Makhlouf HR, Ishak KG, Goodman ZD (1999) Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: a clinicopathologic study of 137 cases. Cancer 85:562–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lauffer JM, Zimmermann A, Krahenbuhl L, Triller J, Baer HU (1996) Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver. A rare hepatic tumor. Cancer 78:2318–2327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amin S, Chung H, Jha R (2011) Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: MR imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 36:407–414. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9662-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jurczyk M, Zhu B, Laskin W, Lin X (2014) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma by FNA and needle core biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 42:516–520. doi:10.1002/dc.22943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leonardou P, Semelka RC, Mastropasqua M, Kanematsu M, Woosley JT (2002) Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver. MR imaging findings. Magn Reson Imaging 20:631–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong A, Dong H, Wang Y, et al. (2013) MRI and FDG PET/CT findings of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. Clin Nucl Med 38:e66–73. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318266ceca

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748. doi:10.1148/rg.296095515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Song KD, Jeong WK (2015) Benign nodules mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI. Clin Mol Hepatol 21:187–191. doi:10.3350/cmh.2015.21.2.187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Paolantonio P, Laghi A, Vanzulli A, et al. (2014) MRI of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH). J Magn Reson Imaging 40:552–558. doi:10.1002/jmri.24391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cieszanowski A, Pacho R, Anysz-Grodzicka A, et al. (2013) Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: the role of hepatobiliary phase imaging for the preoperative diagnosis and qualification of patients for liver transplantation – preliminary experience. Ann Transplant 18:424–433. doi:10.12659/AOT.883997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Economopoulos N, Kelekis NL, Argentos S, et al. (2008) Bright-dark ring sign in MR imaging of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:908–912. doi:10.1002/jmri.21052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goodwin MD, Dobson JE, Sirlin CB, Lim BG, Stella DL (2011) Diagnostic challenges and pitfalls in MR imaging with hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. Radiographics 31:1547–1568. doi:10.1148/rg.316115528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeong WK, Kim YK, Song KD, Choi D, Lim HK (2013) The MR imaging diagnosis of liver diseases using gadoxetic acid: emphasis on hepatobiliary phase. Clin Mol Hepatol 19:360–366. doi:10.3350/cmh.2013.19.4.360

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woo Kyoung Jeong.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Need of informed consent was waived since this study was performed retrospectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.H., Jeong, W.K., Kim, Y.K. et al. Magnetic resonance findings of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: emphasis on hepatobiliary phase using Gd-EOB-DTPA. Abdom Radiol 42, 2261–2271 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1119-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1119-2

Keywords

Navigation