Skip to main content
Log in

MRI in pelvic inflammatory disease: a pictorial review

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an ascending infection of the female genital tract caused by the spread of bacteria from the vagina to the pelvic reproductive organs and occasionally the peritoneum. The most common causative organisms are sexually transmitted. PID is a significant source of morbidity among reproductive age women both as a cause of abdominal pain and as a common cause of infertility. Its clinical presentation is often nonspecific, and the correct diagnosis may first come to light based on the results of imaging studies. MRI is well suited for the evaluation of PID and its complications due to its superior soft tissue contrast and high sensitivity for inflammation. MRI findings in acute PID include cervicitis, endometritis, salpingitis/oophoritis, and inflammation in the pelvic soft tissues. Acute complications include pyosalpinx, tuboovarian abscess, peritonitis, and perihepatitis. Hydrosalpinx, pelvic inclusion cysts and ureteral obstruction may develop as chronic sequela of PID. The pathophysiology, classification, treatment, and prognosis of PID are reviewed, followed by case examples of the appearance of acute and subclinical PID on MR images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDC (2015) Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance 2014. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services

    Google Scholar 

  2. Washington AE, Katz P (1991) Cost of and payment source for pelvic inflammatory disease: trends and projections, 1983 through 2000. Jama 266(18):2565–2569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Birchard KR, et al. (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(2):452–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh AK, Desai H, Novelline RA (2009) Emergency MRI of acute pelvic pain: MR protocol with no oral contrast. Emerg Radiol 16(2):133–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Masselli G, et al. (2011) Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: MR imaging as a valuable adjunct to ultrasound? Abdom Imaging 36(5):596–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baron KT, et al. (2012) Comparing the diagnostic performance of MRI versus CT in the evaluation of acute nontraumatic abdominal pain during pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 19(6):519–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson AK, et al. (2012) Ultrafast 3-T MRI in the evaluation of children with acute lower abdominal pain for the detection of appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1424–1430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunham RC, Gottlieb SL, Paavonen J (2015) Pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 372(21):2039–2048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCormack WM (1994) Pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 330(2):115–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Soper DE (2010) Pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 116(2 Pt 1):419–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cates W Jr, Rolfs RT Jr, Aral SO (1990) Sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: an epidemiologic update. Epidemiol Rev 12:199–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vallerie AM, et al. (2009) Peritoneal inclusion cysts: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(5):321–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopez-Zeno JA, Keith LG, Berger GS (1985) The Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome revisited. Changing perspectives after half a century. J Reprod Med 30(8):567–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lareau, SM, Beigi, RH (2008) Pelvic inflammatory disease and tubo-ovarian abscess. Infect Dis Clin North Am 22(4): 693–708, vii.

  15. Workowski KA, et al. (2015) Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 64(RR-03):1–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sam JW, Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA (2002) Spectrum of CT findings in acute pyogenic pelvic inflammatory disease. Radiographics 22(6):1327–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Healey PR, Quinn D (2010) Imaging pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound 18(3):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horrow MM (2004) Ultrasound of pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Q 20(4):171–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tukeva TA, et al. (1999) MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy and US. Radiology 210(1):209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li W, et al. (2013) Pelvic inflammatory disease: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy with conventional MR with added diffusion-weighted imaging. Abdom Imaging 38(1):193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lauenstein TC, et al. (2008) Evaluation of optimized inversion-recovery fat-suppression techniques for T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 27(6):1448–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sudderuddin S, et al. (2014) MRI appearances of benign uterine disease. Clin Radiol 69(11):1095–1104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kidney E (2014) MDCT and MRI in genitourinary imaging.

  24. Manhart LE, et al. (2003) Mucopurulent cervicitis and Mycoplasma genitalium. J Infect Dis 187(4):650–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim MY, et al. (2009) MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 29(2):495–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duigenan S, Oliva E, Lee SI (2012) Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(2):W122–W131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simons GR, Piwnica-Worms DR, Goldhaber SZ (1993) Ovarian vein thrombosis. Am Heart J 126(3 Pt 1):641–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jenayah AA, et al. (2015) Ovarian vein thrombosis. Pan Afr Med J 21:251

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Demirtas O, et al. (2013) The role of the serum inflammatory markers for predicting the tubo-ovarian abscess in acute pelvic inflammatory disease: a single-center 5-year experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(3):519–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim SH, et al. (2004) Unusual causes of tubo-ovarian abscess: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 24(6):1575–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nishie A, et al. (2003) Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome. Radiologic manifestation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(5):786–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Owens S, et al. (1991) Laparoscopic treatment of painful perihepatic adhesions in Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 78(3 Pt 2):542–543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Camus E, et al. (1999) Pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod 14(5):1243–1249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kazmi Z, Gupta S (2015) Best practice in management of paediatric and adolescent hydrosalpinges: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 195:40–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ullal A, Kollipara PJ (1999) Torsion of a hydrosalpinx in an 18-year-old virgin. J Obstet Gynaecol 19(3):331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. D’Arpe S, et al. (2015) Management of hydrosalpinx before IVF: a literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol 35(6):547–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Outwater EK, et al. (1998) Dilated fallopian tubes: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 208(2):463–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim JS, et al. (1997) Peritoneal inclusion cysts and their relationship to the ovaries: evaluation with sonography. Radiology 204(2):481–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferenc Czeyda-Pommersheim.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

CME activity This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit https://ce.mayo.edu/node/34273 and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Czeyda-Pommersheim, F., Kalb, B., Costello, J. et al. MRI in pelvic inflammatory disease: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol 42, 935–950 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1004-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1004-4

Keywords

Navigation