Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple arterial phase MRI of arterial hypervascular hepatic lesions: improved arterial phase capture and lesion enhancement

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To establish if triple-phase arterial imaging improves the detection of arterial phase hyperintense lesions based on arterial phase capture, motion artifact degradation, and lesion enhancement when compared to single-phase imaging.

Materials and methods

Patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma were imaged at 3.0T. Seventy-three consecutive patients with a standard single-phase MRI and eighty-five consecutive patients were imaged using extracellular contrast with triple arterial phase MRI using three sequential accelerated acquisitions of 8 s. Arterial phase capture and image quality were qualitatively categorized. Forty single-phase and forty-four triple-phase studies contained arterially enhancing lesions > 1 cm with washout appearance. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lesions was calculated. We compared the differences in means with Student t-tests and those in arterial phase capture with a Chi squared test with Yates correction.

Results

The triple-phase acquisitions captured the early or late arterial phases more frequently than did the single-phase acquisition (99% vs 86%; P value = 0.006). Triple-phase also provided greater number of patients with early or late arterial phase imaging without motion artifact (92% vs 79%, P-value = 0.05). The lesion analysis revealed increased maximum CNR in the triple-phase imaging (704.4) vs. single-phase imaging (517.2), P-value < 0.001.

Conclusion

Triple-phase acquisition provides more robust arterial phase imaging for hepatic lesions, with increased lesion CNR, compared to standard single-phase arterial phase imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mittal S, El-Serag HB (2013) Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 47(Suppl):S2–S6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruite I, Tang A, Sirlin CB (2013) Imaging-based diagnostic systems for hepatocellular carcinoma. Amer J Roentgenol. 201:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wald C, Russo MW, Heimbach JK, et al. (2013) New OPTN/UNOS policy for liver transplant allocation: standardization of liver imaging, diagnosis, classification, and reporting of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 266:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee YJ, Lee JM, Lee JS, et al. (2015) Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT and MR imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 275(1):97–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murakami T, Kim T, Takamura M, et al. (2001) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 218:763–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ichikawa T, Kitamura T, Nakajima H, et al. (2002) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: can double arterial phase imaging with multidetector CT improve tumor depiction in the cirrhotic liver? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179:751–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, Yamaguchi M, et al. (2002) Double arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 16:259–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pietryga JA, Burke LMB, Marin D, Jaffe TA, Bashir MR (2014) Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium: examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition. Radiology 271:426–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hope TA, Saranathan M, Petkovska I, et al. (2013) Improvement of gadoxetate arterial phase capture with a high spatio-temporal resolution multiphase three-dimensional SPGR-Dixon sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging. 38:938–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saranathan M, Rettmann DW, Hargreaves BA, Clarke SE, Vasanawala SS (2012) DIfferential Subsampling with Cartesian Ordering (DISCO): a high spatio-temporal resolution Dixon imaging sequence for multiphasic contrast enhanced abdominal imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 35:1484–1492

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hope TA, Petkovska I, Saranathan M, Hargreaves BA, Vasanawala SS (2015) Combined parenchymal and vascular imaging: High spatiotemporal resolution arterial evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging.

  13. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O (2004) OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 17:205–216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim S, Mussi TC, Lee LJ, et al. (2013) Effect of flip angle for optimization of image quality of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced biliary imaging at 1.5 T. Am J Roentgenol. 200:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vogl T, Stupavsky A, Pegios W, et al. (1997) Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with dynamic and static gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 205:721–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mori K, Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, et al. (2005) Triple arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among the early, middle, late, and whole triple arterial phase imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). American college of radiology. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LIRADS. Accessed 18 Feb 2014.

  18. Davenport MS, Viglianti BL, Al-Hawary MM, et al. (2013) Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: effect on arterial phase image quality. Radiology 266:452–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma P, Kalb B, Kitajima HD, et al. (2011) Optimization of single injection liver arterial phase gadolinium enhanced MRI using bolus track real-time imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 33:110–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC (1997) Hepatic arterial-phase dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: optimization with a test examination and a power injector. Radiology 202:268–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frydrychowicz A, Nagle SK, D’Souza SL, Vigen KK, Reeder SB (2011) Optimized high-resolution contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary imaging at 3 tesla: a cross-over comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid. J Magn Reson Imaging. 34:585–594

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O, et al. (2005) Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med. 54:748–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. Hope.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No grant funding was used in this study.

Conflict of interest

Nabia S. Ikram, Judy Yee, Stefanie Weinstein, Benjamin M. Yeh, Carlos U. Corvera, Alexander Monto and Thomas A. Hope declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The need for individual informed consent was waived by our institutional review board (IRB) for this retrospective study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikram, N.S., Yee, J., Weinstein, S. et al. Multiple arterial phase MRI of arterial hypervascular hepatic lesions: improved arterial phase capture and lesion enhancement. Abdom Radiol 42, 870–876 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0948-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0948-8

Keywords

Navigation