Abstract
Our aim was to demonstrate the imaging characteristics of epiploic appendages in native, acute inflamed/ischemic and post-infarcted states through retrospective imaging analysis, with clinical and pathologic correlation, and to discuss clinical implications. Cases were gathered mostly retrospectively and reviewed for inclusion based on established diagnostic criteria. Radiology report text search was used to find cases, using terms “epiploic,” “appendage,” “appendagitis,” and “peritoneal body.” Data records included patient demographics, relevant clinical data, lesion size, location and apparent imaging composition, and the presence of change or stability in features over multiple studies. Pathologic and clinical data were sought and assessed for correlation. Imaging studies of 198 individuals were included (mean age 50, range 9–95), with a total of 228 lesions: 63 acute and 165 non-acute presentations. All included subjects had CT imaging and some had lesions visible on radiographs, MRI, PET/CT, and sonography. 23 subjects had more than one studied lesion. In addition to classic acute appendagitis, more frequently encountered are post-infarcted appendages either in situ along the colon, adhered to peritoneal or serosal surfaces, or freely mobile in the peritoneum as loose bodies. The majority of the non-acute varieties are recognizable due to peripheral calcification that develops over time following ischemic insult. Multiple cases demonstrated the imaging natural history and confirmed pathologic basis for imaging findings. In summary, acute and post-infarcted epiploic appendages have characteristic imaging appearances and natural history which should provide correct diagnosis in most cases. Incidental post-infarcted epiploica are more commonly encountered than acute presentations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Osadch A, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Zissin R (2001) Strangulated small bowel obstruction related to chronic torsion of an epiploic appendix: CT findings. Br J Radiol 74(887):1062–1064
Nemoto H, Yoshizawa Y, Hibi K, et al. (2008) Strangulation caused by a small bowel epiploic appendage: report of a case. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2:214–218
Ghahremani GG, White ME, Hoff FL, et al. (1992) Appendices epiploicae of the colon: radiologic and pathologic features. Radiographics 12:59–77
Pines B, Rabinovitch J, Biller SB (1941) Primary torsion and infarction of the appendices epiploicae. Arch Surg 42:775–787
Carmichael DH, Organ CH Jr (1985) Epiploic disorders: conditions of the epiploic appendages. Arch Surg 120(10):1167–1172
Singh AK, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, et al. (2004) CT appearance of acute appendagitis. Am J Roentgenol 183:1303–1307
Ng KS, Tan A, Chen K, et al. (2006) CT features of primary epiploic appendagitis. Eur J Radiol 59(2):284–288
Rioux M, Langis P (1994) Primary epiploic appendagitis: clinical US, and CT findings in 14 cases. Radiology 191:523–526
Sirvanci M, Balci NC, Karaman K, Duran C, Karakaş E (2002) Primary epiploic appendagitis: MRI findings. Magn Reson Imaging 20(1):137–139
Rao PM, Wittenberg J, Lawrason JN (1997) Primary epiploic appendagitis: evolutionary changes in CT appearance. Radiology 204(3):713–717
Elliott GB, Freigang B (1962) Aseptic necrosis, calcification, and separation of appendices epiploicae. Ann Surg 155:501–505
Borg SA, Whitehouse GH, Griffith CJ (1976) A mobile calcified amputated appendix epiploica. Am J Roentgenol 127:349–350
Barden RP (1939) Calcified epiploic appendages: a radiological curiosity. Radiology 33:768–769
Morales O (1944) Calcified appendices epiploicae as freely mobile bodies in the abdominal cavity. Acta Radiol 25:653–661
Kamaya A, Federle MP, Desser TS (2011) Imaging manifestations of abdominal fat necrosis and its mimics. Radiographics 31(7):2021–2034
Gayer G, Petrovitch I (2011) CT diagnosis of a large peritoneal loose body: case report and review of the literature. Br J Radiol 84(1000):83–85
Karhunen PJ (1985) Hepatic pseudolipoma. J Clin Pathol 38:877–879. doi:10.1136/jcp.38.8.877
Pickhardt PJ, Bhalla S (2005) Unusual nonneoplastic peritoneal and subperitoneal conditions: CT findings. Radiographics 25(3):719–730
Rolleston HD (1891) Lipoma of liver. Pathol Soc Lond Trans 42:160–161
Sasaki M, Harada K, Nakanuma Y, Watanabe K (1994) Pseudolipoma of Glisson’s capsule. Report of six cases and review of the literature. J Clin Gastroenterol 19:75–78
Pounder DJ (1983) Hepatic pseudolipoma. Pathology 15:83–84
Quinn AM, Guzman-Hartman G (2003) Pseudolipoma of glisson capsule. Arch Pathol Lab Med 44:503–504
Metser U, Even-Sapir E (2007) Increased (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in benign, nonphysiologic lesions found on whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT): accumulated data from four years of experience with PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med 37:206–222
Persaud V (1969) Pseudolipoma of Glisson’s capsule. Arch Pathol 88:555–556
Bricou A, Batt RE, Chapron C (2008) Peritoneal fluid flow influences anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions: why Sampson seems to be right. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138:127–134
Meyers MA (1973) Distribution of intra-abdominal malignant seeding: dependency on dynamics of flow of ascitic fluid. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 119:198–206
Agarwal A, Yeh BM, Brieman RS, Quayyum A, Coakley FV (2004) Peritoneal calcification: causes and distinguishing features on CT. Am J Roentgenol 182:441–445
Levy AD, Shaw JC, Sobin LH (2009) Secondary tumors and tumorlike lesions of the peritoneal cavity: imaging features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 29:347–373
Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, et al. (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 7:754–773
Murat FJ, Gettman MT (2004) Free-floating organized fat necrosis: rare presentation of pelvic mass managed with Laparoscopic techniques. Urology 63:176–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This work received no grant funding.
Conflicts of interest
Steven C. Eberhardt, Corinne D. Strickland, Katherine N. Epstein declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
No research procedures. Retrospective medical record reviews of human subjects only. All methods were HIPAA compliant.
Ethical approval
No research procedures. Study involved retrospective medical record reviews of human subjects only. All methods were HIPAA compliant and in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Requirement waived by UNM Human Research Protections Office.
Additional information
CME activity This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit https://ce.mayo.edu/node/22363 and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eberhardt, S.C., Strickland, C.D. & Epstein, K.N. Radiology of epiploic appendages: acute appendagitis, post-infarcted appendages, and imaging natural history. Abdom Radiol 41, 1653–1665 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0757-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0757-0