This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40
Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757
Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 277:142818
Park SY, Jung DC, Oh YT, et al. (2016) Prostate cancer: PI-RADS version 2 helps preoperatively predict clinically significant cancers. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.16151133
Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, et al. (2015) Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4015-6
Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D, et al. (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 Lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152542
Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric mr imaging. Radiology 277(3):741–750
Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269(2):482–492
Marks LS (2016) Some prostate cancers are invisible to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Br J Urol (in press)
Kasel-Seibert M, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, et al. (2016) Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 85(4):726–731
Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43(6):543–549
Shankar V, Bangdiwala SI (2014) Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:100
Lantz CA, Nebenzahl E (1996) Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 49(4):431–434
Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, et al. (2002) Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224(3):871–880
Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E (2009) Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 252(3):665–672
Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, et al. (1997) CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):813–818
Karmazyn B, Tawadros A, Delaney LR, et al. (2015) Ultrasound classification of solitary renal cysts in children. J Pediatr Urol 11(3):149 e141–149 e146
Rosenkrantz AB, Oto A, Turkbey B, Westphalen AC (2016) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look. AJR Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15765
Puech P, Randazzo M, Ouzzane A, et al. (2015) How are we going to train a generation of radiologists (and urologists) to read prostate MRI? Curr Opin Urol 25(6):522–535
Litjens GJ, Barentsz JO, Karssemeijer N, Huisman HJ (2015) Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for determining cancer aggressiveness in prostate MRI. Eur Radiol 25(11):3187–3199
Niaf E, Lartizien C, Bratan F, et al. (2014) Prostate focal peripheral zone lesions: characterization at multiparametric MR imaging–influence of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Radiology 271(3):761–769
Rosenkrantz: Royalties from Thieme Medical Publishers. Margolis: None.
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenkrantz, A.B., Margolis, D.J. Commentary regarding the inter-reader reproducibility of PI-RADS version 2. Abdom Radiol 41, 907–909 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0756-1
- Percent Agreement
- Expert Radiologist
- Double Reading
- Clinical Adoption
- Quality Assurance Method