Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transitioning from peer review to peer learning for abdominal radiologists

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Eisenberg RL, Cunningham ML, Siewert B, Kruskal JB (2014) Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review system. J Am Coll Radiol 11(4):397–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Renfrew DL, Franken EA Jr, Beraum KS, et al. (1992) Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 183:145–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abujudeh HH, Boland GW, Kaewlai R, et al. (2010) Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists. Eur Radiol 20(8):1952–1957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgstede JP, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH (2004) RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates1. J Am Coll Radiol 1(1):59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abujudeh H, Pyatt RS, Bruno MA (2014) RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. J Am Coll Radiol 11(9):899–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson VP, Cushing T, Abujudeh HH, et al. (2009) RADPEER scoring white paper. J Am Coll Radiol 6(1):21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/RADPEER. Accessed on October 15, 2015

  8. http://www.hfap.org/blog/?p=9781. Accessed on October 15, 2015

  9. Kruskal JB, Eisenberg RL. Focused professional performance evaluation of a radiologist—a centers for Medicare and Medicaid services and Joint Commission requirement. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology (in press, available online)

  10. Mahgerefteh S, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Blachar A, Sosna J (2009) Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. RadioGraphics 29(5):1221–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendiratta-Lala M, Eisenberg RL, Steele JR, Boiselle PM, Kruskal JB (2011) Quality initiatives: measuring and managing the procedural competency of radiologists. Radiographics 31:1477–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alkasab TK, Harvey HB, Gowda V, et al. (2014) Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output. J Am Coll Radiol 11(2):131–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maloney E, Lomasney LM, Schomer L (2012) Application of the RADPEERTM scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 9(4):264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strickland NH (2015) Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback. Clinical Rad 70:1158–1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Faculty of Clinical Radiology. Quality assurance in radiology reporting: peer feedback. Clinical Radiology, The Royal College of Radiologists: online https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication/BFCR(14)10_Peer_feedback.pdf Accessed on October 15, 2015

  16. Best M, Neuhauser D (2006) Walter A. Shewehart, 1924, and the Hawthorne factory. Qual Saf Health Care 15(2):142–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee CS, Wadhwa V, Kruskal JB, Larson DB (2015) Conducting a successful practice quality improvement project for American Board of Radiology Certification. Radiographics 35(6):1643–1651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE (2013) Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. Am J Roentgenol 201:611–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brook OR, Kruskal JB, Eisenberg RL, Larson DB (2015) Root cause analysis: learning from adverse safety event. Radiographics 35(6):1655–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Graber M, Gordon R, Franklin N (2002) Reducing diagnostic errors in medicine: what’s the goal? Acad Med. 77:981–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krupinski EA, Berbaum KS, Caldwell RT, Schartz KM, Kim J (2010) Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. J Am Col Radiol 7(9):698–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brook OR, Romero J, Brook A, et al. (2015) The complementary nature of peer review and quality assurance data collection. Radiology 274(1):221–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Siewert B, Kruskal JB, Eisenberg R, Hall F, Sosna J (2009) Quality improvement grand rounds at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: CT colonography performance review after an adverse event. Radiographics 30:23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, USA

    Jonathan B. Kruskal, Ronald L. Eisenberg, Olga Brook & Bettina Siewert

Authors
  1. Jonathan B. Kruskal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald L. Eisenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olga Brook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bettina Siewert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan B. Kruskal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kruskal, J.B., Eisenberg, R.L., Brook, O. et al. Transitioning from peer review to peer learning for abdominal radiologists. Abdom Radiol 41, 416–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0675-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0675-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation