Abstract
Purpose
Compare national trends in utilization and coverage of diagnostic (non-screening) computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the Medicare population before and after achieving Current Procedural Terminology® (CPT) Category I code status in 2010.
Methods
Claims by provider type and location for diagnostic CTC were identified between 2005 and 2013 using Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files. Frequencies of billed and denied services were used to calculate denial rates for CTC and abdominal computed tomography (CT). PubMed search for articles with “CT colonography” in abstract or title during 1997–2013 was performed. Publications were recorded yearly and matched to CTC denial rates.
Results
Annual Medicare claims for diagnostic CTC increased 212% during 2005–2009 in Category III status and increased 27.4% during 2009–2013 after implementation of Category I codes. Claims for abdominal CT rose 13.4% over the same overall period. Denial rates decreased from 70% to 32.8% between 2005 and 2009, and fluctuated between 24.7 and 30.6% thereafter. Denial rates for abdominal CT remained constant (4.1%–4.6%). From 2005 to 2013, services grew most in the private office (1678–7293) and hospital outpatient (1644–6449) settings with radiologists performing 93.3% of CTC. 1037 CTC publications were identified which increased 3567% between 1997 (3) and 2008 (107), plateaued until 2010 (114) and declined thereafter (75 in 2013).
Conclusions
Diagnostic CTC grew dramatically from 2005 to 2009, but slowed thereafter; even after achieving CPT Category I code status in 2010. Medicare denial rates declined during early years but later stabilized which paralleled a slowing in new peer-reviewed research. CTC continues to be performed predominately by radiologists in the outpatient setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
American Cancer Society (2011) Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2011–2013. GA: Atlanta
Maciosek MV, Solberg LI, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Goodman MJ (2006) Colorectal cancer screening: health impact and cost effectiveness. Am J Prev Med 31:80–89
Pickhardt PJ (2006) Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 239(2):313–316
Yee J, Keysor KJ, Kim DH (2013) The time has arrived for national reimbursement of screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(1):73–79. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.10656
Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359(12):1207–1217. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0800996
Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58(2):241–248. doi:10.1136/gut.2008.156448
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200
Yee J, Kim DH, Rosen MP, et al. (2014) ACR Appropriateness Criteria colorectal cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol 11(6):543–551. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.006
American College of Radiology (2015) USPSTF Refusal to name CT Colonography a recommended screening tool may slow colorectal cancer screening progress and increase spending. American College of Radiology newswise. http://www.newswise.com/articles/uspstf-refusal-to-name-ct-colonography-a-recommended-screening-tool-may-slow-colorectal-cancer-screening-progress-and-increase-spending. Accessed 6 Oct 2015
Raab GG, Parr DH (2006) From medical invention to clinical practice: the reimbursement challenge facing new device procedures and technology-part 1: issues in medical device assessment. J Am Coll Radiol 3(9):694–702
Duszak R Jr, Optican RJ, Brin KP, Woodard PK (2011) Cardiac CT and coronary CTA: early Medicare claims analysis of national and regional utilization and coverage. J Am Coll Radiol 8(8):549–555. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.12.024
Duszak R Jr, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2011) Expanding utilization and regional coverage of diagnostic CT colonography: early Medicare claims experience. J Am Coll Radiol 8(4):235–241. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.028
Duszak R Jr (2004) CT colonography and virtual reimbursement. J Am Coll Radiol 7:457–458
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2012) Data from the 100 percent Denominator File. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/MedicareMedicaidStatSupp/Downloads/2013_Section2.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015
National Center for Biotechnology Information (2015) PubMed help. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3827/ Accessed 21 Oct 2015
Friedman AC, Downing D, Chino J, et al. (2010) Feasibility of Remote CT Colonography at Two Rural Native American Medical Centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1110–1117. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4383
American College of Radiology (2014) ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR Practice parameter for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. http:www.acr.org/~/media/A81531ACA92F45058A83B5281E8FE826.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015 [S]
Rockey DC, Barish M, Brill JV, et al. (2007) Standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 133(3):1005–1024
Cash BD, Rockey DC, Brill JV (2011) AGA standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomography colonography: 2011 update. Gastroenterology 141(6):2240–2266. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.09.043
Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2010) Radiologists should read CT colonography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20(2):259–269. doi:10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.005
American College of Radiology. ACR Whitepaper on Split Interpretations. http://www.acr.org/Membership/Legal-Business-Practices/Stark-Self-Referral/ACR-Whitepaper-on-Split-Interpretations. Accessed 15 Dec 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Kelly Cox DO, Richard Duszak Jr. MD, Jennifer Hemingway, MS, Danny R. Hughes PhD, and Sadhna B. Nandwana MD declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, K., Duszak, R., Hemingway, J. et al. Reassessing medicare trends in diagnostic CT colonography after achieving CPT code category I status. Abdom Radiol 41, 1357–1362 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0636-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0636-8