Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applications of process improvement techniques to improve workflow in abdominal imaging

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Major changes in the management and funding of healthcare are underway that will markedly change the way radiology studies will be reimbursed. The result will be the need to deliver radiology services in a highly efficient manner while maintaining quality. The science of process improvement provides a practical approach to improve the processes utilized in radiology. This article will address in a step-by-step manner how to implement process improvement techniques to improve workflow in abdominal imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee CS, Wadhwa V, Kruskal JB, Larson DB (2015) Conducting a successful practice quality improvement project for American Board of Radiology Certification. Radiographics 35(6):1643–1651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Donnelly LF (2015) Invited commentary: changes to the ABR policy on requirements for diplomates to meet MOC Part 4-PQI projects and activities. Radiographics 35(6):1652–1654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Larson DB, Kruskal JB, Krecke KN, Donnelly LF (2015) Key concepts of patient safety in radiology. Radiographics 35(6):1677–1693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinick RM, Quigley DD, Mayer LA, Sellers CD (2014) Use of CAHPS patient experience surveys to assess the impact of health care innovations. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf/Joint Comm Resour 40(9):418–427

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkins CM, Alsip CN, Pryor RM, Leach AD, Larson DB (2013) Quality improvement and confirmation projects: facilitating rapid, measurable performance improvement. Radiographics 33(7):e225–e235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scalo JF, Rascati KL (2014) Trends and issues in oncology costs. Exp Rev Pharmacoecon Outcome Res 14(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Froimson MI, Rana A, White RE Jr, et al. (2013) Bundled payments for care improvement initiative: the next evolution of payment formulations: AAHKS bundled payment task force. J Arthroplast 28(8 Suppl):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tague NR (2005) Chapter 3: the quality improvement process. Quality toolbox, 2nd edn. Milwaukee: Quality Press, pp 35–51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scholtes PR, Joiner BL, Streibel BJ (2003) Chapter 3: doing work in teams. In The team handbook, 3rd edn. Oriel Incorporated: Madison, pp xv–xxxii

  10. Carey RG, Lloyd RC (2001) Chapter 3: data collection. Measuring quality improvement in healthcare: a guide to statistical process control applications. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality, pp 28–43

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tamm EP, Szklaruk J, Puthooran L, et al. (2012) Quality initiatives: planning, setting up, and carrying out radiology process improvement projects. Radiographics 32(5):1529–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chand S, Moskowitz H, Norris JB, Shade S, Willis DR (2009) Improving patient flow at an outpatient clinic: study of sources of variability and improvement factors. Health Care Manag Sci 12(3):325–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohammed MA, Worthington P, Woodall WH (2008) Plotting basic control charts: tutorial notes for healthcare practitioners. Qual Saf Health Care 17(2):137–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wheeler DJ (2000) Understanding variation: the key to managing chaos, 2nd edn. Knoxville: SPC Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carey RG, Lloyd RC (2001) Using run and control charts to analyze process variation. Measuring quality improvement in healthcare: a guide to statistical process control applications. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality, pp 53–77

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tague NR (2005) Chapter 5: the tools. The quality toolbox, 2nd edn. Milwaukee: Quality Press, pp 35–51

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carey RG, Lloyd RC (2001) Chapter 2: preparing to collect data. Measuring quality improvement in healthcare: a guide to statistical process control applications. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality, pp 13–27

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson CD, Miranda R, Aakre KT, et al. (2010) Process improvement: what is it, why is it important, and how is it done? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(2):461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kruskal JB, Eisenberg R, Sosna J, et al. (2011) Quality initiatives: quality improvement in radiology: basic principles and tools required to achieve success. Radiographics 31(6):1499–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. ABR (2015) Maintenance of certification. The American Board of Radiology. Accessed 10/1/2015. http://www.theabr.org/moc-dr-comp4

  21. RSNA (2014) RSNA 2014 Quality storyboards. Radiological Society of North America. Accessed 10/1/2015

  22. RSNA (2014) QI tools. Radiological Society of North America. Accessed 10/1/2015 https://www.rsna.org/QI_Tools.aspx

  23. RSNA (2014) Practice Quality Improvement Projects. Radiological Society of North America. Accessed 10/1/2015 https://www.rsna.org/Practice_Quality_Improvement_Projects.aspx

  24. RSNA (2014) Quality improvement certificate program. Radiological Society of North America. Accessed 10/1/2015 https://www.rsna.org/Quality_Improvement_Certificate_Program.aspx

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Eric P. Tamm has received a research grant from General Electric.

Ethical Standards

This study was funded by the NIH/NCI under award number P30CA016672.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Diagnostic Radiology, Unit 1473, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, T. Boone Picken’s Academic Tower, Office Location-FCT15.6094, 1400 Pressler Street, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA

    Eric Peter Tamm

Authors
  1. Eric Peter Tamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Peter Tamm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamm, E.P. Applications of process improvement techniques to improve workflow in abdominal imaging. Abdom Radiol 41, 405–415 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0555-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0555-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation