Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differentiation of deep venous thrombosis from femoral vein mixing artifact on routine abdominopelvic CT

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study is to assess the performance of qualitative and quantitative imaging features for the differentiation of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) from mixing artifact on routine portal venous phase abdominopelvic CT.

Methods

This retrospective study included 40 adult patients with a femoral vein filling defect on portal venous phase CT and a Duplex ultrasound (n = 36) or catheter venogram (n = 4) to confirm presence or absence of DVT. Two radiologists (R1, R2) assessed the femoral veins for various qualitative and quantitative features.

Results

60% of patients were confirmed to have DVT and 40% had mixing artifact. Features with significantly greater frequency in DVT than mixing artifact (all p ≤ 0.006) were central location (R1 90% vs. 28%; R2 96% vs. 31%), sharp margin (R1 83% vs. 28%; R2 96% vs. 31%), venous expansion (R1 48% vs. 6%, R2 56% vs. 6%), and venous wall enhancement (R1 62% vs. 0%; R2 48% vs. 0%). DVT exhibited significantly lower mean attenuation than mixing artifact (R1 42.1 ± 20.2 vs. 57.1 ± 23.6 HU; R2 43.6 ± 19.4 vs. 58.8 ± 23.4 HU, p ≤ 0.031) and a significantly larger difference in vein diameter compared to the contralateral vein (R1 0.4 ± 0.4 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 cm; R2 0.3 ± 0.4 vs. 0.0 ± 0.1 cm, p ≤ 0.026). At multivariable analysis, central location and sharp margin were significant independent predictors of DVT for both readers (p ≤ 0.013).

Conclusion

Awareness of these qualitative and quantitative imaging features may improve radiologists’ confidence for differentiating femoral vein DVT and mixing artifact on routine portal venous phase CT. However, given overlap with mixing artifact, larger studies remain warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Keane M, Roche C, Murphy JM (2007) Prevalence and significance of asymptomatic venous thromboembolic disease found on oncologic staging CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:162–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haines ST (2003) Venous thromboembolism: pathophysiology and clinical presentation. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 60:S3–S5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldhaber SZ (1998) Pulmonary embolism. New Engl J Med 339:93–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Nisio M, Lee AY, Carrier M, et al. (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 13:880–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yankelevitz DF, Gamsu G, Shah A, et al. (2000) Optimization of combined CT pulmonary angiography with lower extremity CT venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:67–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Willems V, Dondelinger RF (2002) Pitfalls in CT venography of lower limbs and abdominal veins. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1465–1471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loud PA, Grossman ZD, Klippenstein DL, Ray CE (1998) Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a new diagnostic technique for suspected thromboembolic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:951–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ciccotosto C, Goodman LR, Washington L, Quiroz FA (2002) Indirect CT venography following CT pulmonary angiography: spectrum of CT findings. J Thorac Imaging 17:18–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loud PA, Katz DS, Klippenstein DL, Shah RD, Grossman ZD (2000) Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in suspected thromboembolic disease: diagnostic accuracy for deep venous evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:61–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, et al. (2000) Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. The Pulmonary Angiography-Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group. Radiology 216:744–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baldt MM, Zontsich T, Stumpflen A, et al. (1996) Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity: efficacy of spiral CT venography compared with conventional venography in diagnosis. Radiology 200:423–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zierler BK (2004) Ultrasonography and diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 109:I9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankur M. Doshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doshi, A.M., Hoffman, D., Kierans, A.S. et al. Differentiation of deep venous thrombosis from femoral vein mixing artifact on routine abdominopelvic CT. Abdom Imaging 40, 3191–3195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0525-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0525-6

Keywords

Navigation