Skip to main content
Log in

Can a T2 hyperintense rim sign differentiate uterine leiomyomas from other solid adnexal masses?

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the incidence of high T2 signal rims surrounding leiomyomas, evaluate if a particular T2-weighted sequence is more effective in depicting this rim, and determine if this sign is useful in differentiating pedunculated leiomyomas from other solid adnexal masses.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, two radiologists evaluated 233 T2 dark pelvic masses (223 uterine leiomyomas and 10 ovarian fibromas) in 60 women (mean age 47) on Magnetic resonance imaging for the presence of a high signal rim. Three different T2-weighted sequences were reviewed independently for uterine leiomyomas: half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE), SPACE, and T2 with fat saturation (T2 FS). Only T2 FS images were available for 10 fibromas. A consensus review was conducted for discrepant cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test, kappa test, and ANOVA

Results

For 223 uterine leiomyomas, 23% (95% CI 17.8–28.9%) demonstrated a high T2 signal rim sign on T2 FS compared with 4.9% (95% CI 2.6–8.9%) for HASTE and 6.7% (95% CI 3.9–11.1%) for SPACE. The difference between the number of positive rims on T2 FS relative–HASTE and SPACE was statistically significant (p < 0.001). For ovarian fibromas, 40% (95% CI 16.9–68.8%) were classified positive for a rim sign.

Conclusion

A high T2 signal rim sign was present for up to 23% of uterine leiomyomas and the T2 FS sequence detected this rim sign most frequently. Up to 40% of ovarian fibromas can also have a T2 rim sign and, therefore, a solid adnexal mass with a T2 rim sign cannot be assumed to represent a pedunculated leiomyoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adusumilli S, Hussain HK, Caoili EM, et al. (2006) MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Am J Roentgenol 187:732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saini A, Dina R, McIndoe GA, et al. (2005) Characterization of adnexal masses with MRI. Am J Roentgenol 184:1004–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Perez-Jaffe LA, Tureck RW (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis and treatment. Radiographics 19:1179–1197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. (1999) Unusual appearance of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 19:S131–S145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hricak H, Finck S, Honda G, Goranson H (1992) MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced T1 weighted images. Am J Roentgenol 158:1043–1050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinagare AB, Meylaerts LJ, Laury AR, Mortele KJ (2012) MRI features of ovarian fibroma and fibrothecoma with histopathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 198:W296–W303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Jeong YK, Park JK, Hwang JC (2003) “Ovarian vascular pedicle” sign revealing organ of origin of a pelvic mass lesion on helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 181:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Torashima M, Yamashita Y, Matsuno Y, et al. (1999) The value of detection of flow voids between the uterus and the leiomyoma with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittl RL, Yeh IT, Kressel HY (1991) High signal intensity rim surrounding uterine leiomyomas on MR images: pathologic correlation. Radiology 180:81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Aibe H, et al. (2006) MDCT of the gonadal veins in females with large pelvic masses: value in differentiating ovarian versus uterine origin. Am J Roentgenol 186:440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JC, Kim SS, Park JY (2000) “Bridging vascular sign” in the MR diagnosis of exophytic uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:57–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilde S, Scott-Barrett S (2009) Radiological appearances of uterine fibroids. Indian J Radiol Imaging 19:222–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deshmukh SP, Gonsalves CF, Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG (2012) Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolization. Radiographics 32:E251–E281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All of the authors have no competing interest and have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Reiter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reiter, M.J., Schwope, R.B., Lisanti, C.J. et al. Can a T2 hyperintense rim sign differentiate uterine leiomyomas from other solid adnexal masses?. Abdom Imaging 40, 3182–3190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0510-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0510-0

Keywords

Navigation