Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas mimicking other lesions

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

While the typical features of large cholangiocarcinomas have been described extensively and are known to radiologists, atypical cholangiocarcinomas are not as well known and radiologists should be more aware of their features. Due to the increasing numbers of cross-sectional imaging studies performed for various reasons, cholangiocarcinomas may be more frequently detected incidentally when small, before they become symptomatic, and might be mistaken for other liver lesions. We studied the appearance of misdiagnosed cholangiocarcinomas.

Materials and methods

This is a HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study. Our institutional database and teaching files were searched for cases of cholangiocarcinomas diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 that were initially misdiagnosed or considered indeterminate lesions on MRI or CT. Clinical data and radiological findings were collected. History of malignancy and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma were recorded. The initial reported diagnosis and time to the correct diagnosis were noted, and the lesions were evaluated for size, enhancement, T1/T2 signal, diffusion restriction, ADC value, capsular retraction, biliary dilatation and the presence of satellite nodules.

Results

Nine examples of cholangiocarcinoma that met our inclusion criteria were identified: seven men and two women. All were small, with a mean size of 2.2 cm upon initial diagnosis. All showed a hypervascular pattern of enhancement without washout. Imaging features that are described in the literature as typical for cholangiocarcinomas, such as capsular retraction, satellite nodules, and peripheral biliary dilatation, were not seen.

Conclusion

Cholangiocarcinomas can be misdiagnosed when they are small and hypervascular. This atypical hypervascular appearance is rare, and may mimic benign liver lesions and other malignant lesions, especially when small. Awareness of the confounding imaging features of these tumors should lead to a more meticulous evaluation of small hypervascular lesions, and may minimize the risk of misdiagnosing early-stage cholangiocarcinomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Welzel TM, McGlynn KA, Hsing AW, O’Brien TR, Pfeiffer RM (2006) Impact of classification of hilar cholangiocarcinomas (Klatskin tumors) on the incidence of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(12):873–875. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Charbel H, Al-Kawas FH (2011) Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and diagnosis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13(2):182–187. doi:10.1007/s11894-011-0178-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rizvi S, Gores GJ (2013) Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 145(6):1215–1229. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burak K, Angulo P, Pasha TM, et al. (2004) Incidence and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 99(3):523–526. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04067.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tyson GL, El-Serag HB (2011) Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 54(1):173–184. doi:10.1002/hep.24351

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung YE, Kim MJ, Park YN, et al. (2009) Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 29(3):683–700. doi:10.1148/rg.293085729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamrick-Turner J, Abbitt PL, Ros PR (1992) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: MR appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(1):77–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vilgrain V, Van Beers BE, Flejou JF (1997) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: MRI and pathologic correlation in 14 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21(1):59–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, et al. (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol: JACR 7(10):754–773. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrl D, Rothaug K, Herzog P, Hofer B, Rau HG (2012) “Incidentaloma” of the liver: management of a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. HPB Surg 2012:891787. doi:10.1155/2012/891787

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM (1999) Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 210(1):71–74. doi:10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja0371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khalil HI, Patterson SA, Panicek DM (2005) Hepatic lesions deemed too small to characterize at CT: prevalence and importance in women with breast cancer. Radiology 235(3):872–878. doi:10.1148/radiol.2353041099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koea JB (2013) Hepatic incidentaloma: the rule of tens. HPB: Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 15(5):379–383. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00595.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Della Corte C, Colombo M (2012) Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Oncol 39(4):384–398. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2012.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu J, Igarashi S, Sasaki M, et al. (2012) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas in cirrhosis are hypervascular in comparison with those in normal livers. Liver Int: Off J Int Assoc Study Liver 32(7):1156–1164. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2012.02783.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parente DB, Perez RM, Eiras-Araujo A, et al. (2012) MR imaging of hypervascular lesions in the cirrhotic liver: a diagnostic dilemma. Radiographics 32(3):767–787. doi:10.1148/rg.323115131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vallin M, Sturm N, Lamblin G, et al. (2013) Unrecognized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an analysis of 993 adult cirrhotic liver explants. Clin Transplant 27(3):403–409. doi:10.1111/ctr.12108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dhanasekaran R, Hemming AW, Zendejas I, et al. (2013) Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncol Rep 29(4):1259–1267. doi:10.3892/or.2013.2290

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park HJ, Kim YK, Park MJ, Lee WJ (2013) Small intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma: target sign on diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 38(4):793–801. doi:10.1007/s00261-012-9943-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takakura K, Kajihara M, Iwasaki T, et al. (2013) Unusual images of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Case Rep Gastroenterol 7(3):414–419. doi:10.1159/000352015

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D’Onofrio M, Vecchiato F, Cantisani V, et al. (2008) Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (IPCC): comparison between perfusion ultrasound and CT imaging. Radiol Med 113(1):76–86. doi:10.1007/s11547-008-0225-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keogan MT, Seabourn JT, Paulson EK, et al. (1997) Contrast-enhanced CT of intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: delay time for optimal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(6):1493–1499. doi:10.2214/ajr.169.6.9393152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maetani Y, Itoh K, Watanabe C, et al. (2001) MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(6):1499–1507. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang Y, Lee JM, Kim SH, Han JK, Choi BI (2012) Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images. Radiology 264(3):751–760. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Park MJ, Kim YK, Park HJ, Hwang J, Lee WJ (2013) Scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging: emphasis on the differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37(6):872–881. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31829d44c1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim SH, Lee CH, Kim BH, et al. (2012) Typical and atypical imaging findings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36(6):704–709. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182706562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Al Ansari N, Kim BS, Srirattanapong S, et al. (2014) Mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma of unknown primary: can they be distinguished on liver MRI? Abdom Imaging 39(6):1228–1240. doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0172-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshida Y, Imai Y, Murakami T, et al. (1999) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with marked hypervascularity. Abdom Imaging 24(1):66–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nanashima A, Abo T, Murakami G, et al. (2013) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: relationship between tumor imaging enhancement by measuring attenuation and clinicopathologic characteristics. Abdom Imaging 38(4):785–792. doi:10.1007/s00261-012-9974-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ariizumi S, Kotera Y, Takahashi Y, et al. (2011) Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with marked enhancement on arterial-phase computed tomography reflects favorable surgical outcomes. J Surg Oncol 104(2):130–139. doi:10.1002/jso.21917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Galia M, Taibbi A, Marin D, et al. (2014) Focal lesions in cirrhotic liver: what else beyond hepatocellular carcinoma? Diagn Interv Radiol 20(3):222–228. doi:10.5152/dir.2014.13184

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murakami T, Tsurusaki M (2014) Hypervascular benign and malignant liver tumors that require differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma: key points of imaging diagnosis. Liver Cancer 3(2):85–96. doi:10.1159/000343864

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nam SJ, Park KY, Yu JS, et al. (2012) Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: relationship between speed of intratumoral enhancement during dynamic MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient on diffusion-weighted imaging. Korean J Radiol: Off J Korean Radiol Soc 13(6):728–735. doi:10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cieszanowski A, Anysz-Grodzicka A, Szeszkowski W, et al. (2012) Characterization of focal liver lesions using quantitative techniques: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values and T2 relaxation times. Eur Radiol 22(11):2514–2524. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2519-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Galea N, Cantisani V, Taouli B (2013) Liver lesion detection and characterization: role of diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(6):1260–1276. doi:10.1002/jmri.23947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller FH, Hammond N, Siddiqi AJ, et al. (2010) Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatic lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 32(1):138–147. doi:10.1002/jmri.22235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ros PR, Buck JL, Goodman ZD, Ros AM, Olmsted WW (1988) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 167(3):689–693. doi:10.1148/radiology.167.3.2834769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 676 North Saint Clair Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA

    Sharon Z. Adam, Sudharshan Parthasarathy & Frank H. Miller

Authors
  1. Sharon Z. Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sudharshan Parthasarathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank H. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank H. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adam, S.Z., Parthasarathy, S. & Miller, F.H. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas mimicking other lesions. Abdom Imaging 40, 2345–2354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0480-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0480-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation