Skip to main content
Log in

Pre-operative CT predictors associated with 30-day adverse events in patients with appendiceal inflammatory masses who underwent immediate appendectomies

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate pre-operative CT predictors that are associated with 30-day adverse events in patients who underwent immediate appendectomies for appendiceal inflammatory masses.

Methods

This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. One hundred forty-four consecutive patients who underwent immediate appendectomies and were diagnosed with appendiceal inflammatory masses by pre-operative CT from January 2005 to December 2013 at a tertiary hospital were included. The main outcome measure was 30-day adverse events. Patient demographics and data for inflammatory markers including leukocyte counts, segmented neutrophils, and C-reactive protein levels were collected by a single radiologist. Pre- and post-operative CT findings were evaluated for features of appendiceal inflammatory masses, associated findings, and post-operative adverse events by two radiologists in a blinded fashion with consensus to assess surgical and pathologic results, post-operative outcomes, and original CT interpretations. Appendiceal inflammatory masses were defined as complicated appendicitis with a phlegmon or an abscess that was identified on pre-operative CT exam. Factors associated with 30-day adverse events were assessed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 22 (15%) of the 144 patients (mean age [±SD] 44.6 ± 22.0 years, range 3–97 years) experienced 30-day adverse events: ten intra-abdominal abscesses, three wound infections, two cases of peritonitis, two small bowel obstructions, two intra-abdominal abscesses with peritonitis, one intra-abdominal abscess with wound infection, one intra-abdominal abscess with small bowel obstruction, and one case of peritonitis with small bowel obstruction. In univariate analysis, the presence of appendicolith (odds ratio [OR] 2.49, p = 0.048) and high-grade obstruction (OR 3.79; p = 0.01) were associated with adverse events. High-grade obstruction (adjusted OR 3.05; p = 0.04) was the only independent pre-operative predictor associated with 30-day adverse events in patients with appendiceal inflammatory masses.

Conclusions

High-grade obstruction was an independent pre-operative CT predictor associated with 30-day adverse events in patients who underwent immediate appendectomies for appendiceal inflammatory masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shipsey MR, O’Donnell B (1985) Conservative management of appendix mass in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:23–24

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tannoury J, Abboud B (2013) Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol 19:3942–3950

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Senapathi PS, Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ (2002) Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc 16:1783–1785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lane JS, Schmit PJ, Chandler CF, et al. (2001) Ileocecectomy is definitive treatment for advanced appendicitis. Am Surg 67:1117–1122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson JE Jr, Bennion RS, Schmit PJ, Hiyama DT (1994) Cecectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 179:135–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffmann J, Lindhard A, Jensen HE (1984) Appendix mass: conservative management without interval appendectomy. Am J Surg 148:379–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bleker RJ, Wereldsma JC (1989) Colonic malignancy mimicking an appendiceal mass. Neth J Surg 41:42–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen C, Botelho C, Cooper A, et al. (2003) Current practice patterns in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg 196:212–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goh BK, Chui CH, Yap TL, et al. (2005) Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 40:1134–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vakili C (1976) Operative treatment of appendix mass. Am J Surg 131:312–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Poon RT, Chu KW (1999) Inflammatory cecal masses in patients presenting with appendicitis. World J Surg 23:713–716 (discussion 716)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, et al. (2006) Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 241:780–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Drake FT, Florence MG, Johnson MG, et al. (2012) Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State’s Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 256:586–594

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeffrey RB Jr, Federle MP, Tolentino CS (1988) Periappendiceal inflammatory masses: CT-directed management and clinical outcome in 70 patients. Radiology 167:13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Humes DJ, Simpson J (2006) Acute appendicitis. Br Med J 333:530–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Emil S, Elkady S, Shbat L, et al. (2014) Determinants of postoperative abscess occurrence and percutaneous drainage in children with perforated appendicitis. Pediatr Surg Int 30:1265–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimizu T, Ishizuka M, Kubota K (2014) The preoperative serum C-reactive protein level is a useful predictor of surgical site infections in patients undergoing appendectomy. Surg Today . doi:10.1007/s00595-014-1086-y

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vahdad MR, Troebs R-B, Nissen M, et al. (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children has complication rates comparable with those of open appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 48:555–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Wijck K, de Jong JR, van Heurn LW, van der Zee DC (2010) Prolonged antibiotic treatment does not prevent intra-abdominal abscesses in perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 34:3049–3053

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M (1993) Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg 80:18–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Andersson RE, Petzold MG (2007) Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 246:741–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Horrow MM, White DS, Horrow JC (2003) Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT. Radiology 227:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin M, Lubrano J, Azizi A, et al. (2015) Inflammatory appendix mass in patients with acute appendicitis: CT diagnosis and clinical relevance. Emerg Radiol 22:7–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ein SH, Nasr A, Ein A (2013) Open appendectomy for pediatric ruptured appendicitis: a historical clinical review of the prophylaxis of wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Can J Surg 56:E7–E12

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fukuya T, Hawes DR, Lu CC, et al. (1992) CT diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction: efficacy in 60 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:765–769 (discussion 771-762)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, et al. (1994) CT of small-bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:37–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frager DH, Baer JW, Rothpearl A, Bossart PA (1995) Distinction between postoperative ileus and mechanical small-bowel obstruction: value of CT compared with clinical and other radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:891–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R, et al. (2005) CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:406–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim MS, Park HW, Park JY, et al. (2014) Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome. Abdom Imaging 39:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg 190:474–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC, et al. (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1282–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Alexander AA, Eschelman DJ, Nazarian LN, Bonn J (1994) Transrectal sonographically guided drainage of deep pelvic abscesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1227–1230 (discussion 1231-1222)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh J, Kumar R, Kalyanpur A (2006) Small bowel feces sign: a CT sign in small bowel obstruction. Ind J Radiol Imag 16:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Deelder JD, Richir MC, Schoorl T, Schreurs WH (2014) How to treat an appendiceal inflammatory mass: operatively or nonoperatively? J Gastrointest Surg 18:641–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fike FB, Mortellaro VE, Juang D, et al. (2011) The impact of postoperative abscess formation in perforated appendicitis. J Surg Res 170:24–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Henry MW, Walker A, Silverman BL, et al. (2007) Risk factors for the development of abdominal abscess following operation for perforated appendicitis in children: a multicenter case-control study. Arch Surg 142:236–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Maglinte DD, Gage SN, Harmon BH, et al. (1993) Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis. Radiology 188:61–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Institutional review board approved the study.

Conflict of interest

Neither financial ties to disclose nor conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Sung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M.S., Kim, M.S., Kim, D.H. et al. Pre-operative CT predictors associated with 30-day adverse events in patients with appendiceal inflammatory masses who underwent immediate appendectomies. Abdom Imaging 40, 2263–2271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0478-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0478-9

Keywords

Navigation