Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘It’s all foreign to me’: how to decipher gastrointestinal intraluminal foreign bodies

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In evaluating the gastrointestinal tract, whether in the emergency room setting, the inpatient setting or the outpatient setting, the radiologist may encounter a myriad of intraluminal radio-opaque, non-anatomic entities. It is the radiologist’s role to distinguish between true foreign bodies and medical paraphernalia. Further, the later must be evaluated for proper positioning vs. improper, potentially detrimental positioning. While many foreign bodies from the community may be distinctly familiar to the radiologist, the large variety of medical tools in existence may not be. Furthermore, many medical devices are designed to transiently traverse, or interact with the gastrointestinal tract, requiring the radiologist to become familiar with their natural history. We explore a select group of common and uncommon intraluminal foreign bodies and will divide them into medical paraphernalia that are properly positioned; medical paraphernalia that are in abnormal locations and miscellaneous foreign bodies from the community. For each medical tool, we will discuss its development and medical utility, natural history as it relates to the gastrointestinal tract, optimal positioning as assessed radiologically, malpositioning, and subsequent complications. A small selection of unusual foreign bodies from the community will be presented. Finally, a selection of medical conditions which produce symptoms due to acquired intraluminal objects will be reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, et al. (2013) Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J JASE 26(9):921–964

    Google Scholar 

  2. PillCam by given imaging. http://pillcamcrohns.com. Last revised 1 May 2013. Accessed 17 Nov 2014.

  3. Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R, Lewis BS (2005) ICCE consensus for capsule retention. Endoscopy 37:1065–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barkin JS, Friedman S (2002) Wireless capsule endoscopy requiring surgical intervention: the world’s experience. Am J Gastroenterol 97:A83

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abell T, McCallum R, Hocking M, et al. (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125(2):421–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson LF, Demeester TR (1974) Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62(4):325–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kothari TH, Haber G, Sonpal N, Karanth N (2012) The over-the-scope clip system—a novel technique for gastrocutaneous fistula closure: the first North American experience. Can J Gastroenterol 26(4):193–195

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordon JP, Torres CF, García AB, Rodriguez FG, de Parga JMS (2012) Endoscopic management of esophageal varices. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4(7):312–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, et al. (2007) Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology 46:922–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Binmoeller KF, Thonke F, Soehendra N (1993) Endoscopic hemoclip treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 25:167–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daram SR, Tang SJ, Wu R, To SD (2013) Benchtop testing and comparisons among three types of through-the-scope endoscopic clipping devices. Surg Endosc 27(5):1521–1529 (Epub 2013 Jan 5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJN (2003) Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. Engl J Med 348(3):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lincourt AE, Harrell A, Cristiano J, et al. (2007) Retained foreign bodies after surgery. J Surg Res 138:170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buhling KJ, Zite NB, Lotke P, Black K (2014) Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception: a review. Contraception 89(3):162–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alvarez F, Brache V, Fernandez E, et al. (1988) New insights on the mode of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices in women. Fertil Steril 49(5):768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. WHO Scientific Group (1987) Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 753:1

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wyllie R (2006) Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Pediatr 18(5):563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park JJ, Wolff BG, Tollefson MK, Walsh EE, Larson DR (2005) Meckel diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience with 1476 patients (1950–2002). Ann Surg 241(3):529

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Strickland GT (1994) Gastrointestinal manifestations of schistosomiasis. Gut 35(10):1334

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiram Shaish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaish, H., Gilet, A. & Gerard, P. ‘It’s all foreign to me’: how to decipher gastrointestinal intraluminal foreign bodies. Abdom Imaging 40, 2173–2192 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0434-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0434-8

Keywords

Navigation