Skip to main content
Log in

Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The posterior subcapsular region of the prostate is often undersampled by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy. The close proximity of these lesions to the posterior capsular wall of the prostate makes them difficult to localize while increasing the need for early detection because of their increased risk for extracapsular extension. We retrospectively evaluated the multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) features of subcapsular prostate cancers to make radiologists more aware of this condition.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2010 and July 2014, all patients referred for 3T mpMRI and subsequent MR-US Fusion-guided biopsy (FgBx) and systematic 12-core sextant biopsy (SBx) under an IRB approved protocol, were reviewed, and imaging confirmed subcapsular prostate cancers were identified. Subcapsular lesions were defined as thin lesions that were just inside the prostate capsule. Matching patient demographics and clinical findings including age, PSA, PSA density, whole prostate volume, history of prostate cancer, Gleason score, and clinical management were tabulated.

Results

Of 992 eligible patients, 33 patients had subcapsular lesions in the prostate detected by mpMRI. Mean age, PSA, and prostate volume in this group were 63 years (range: 52–76 years), 8.4 ng/mL (range: 1.22–65.20), and 53 mL (range: 12–125 mL), respectively. The combination biopsy (SBx + FgBx) confirmed prostate cancer in 24 of 33 patients (72.7%) and in 9 patients the biopsy was negative. Of the 24 cancers, 19 were confirmed on both FgBx and conventional biopsy; however, 5 cancers were only detected on FgBx. In 4 of the 19 patients in which both biopsy methods were positive, the FgBx yielded a higher Gleason score.

Conclusion

Subcapsular lesions on mpMRI are relatively infrequent but are usually malignant. Although the majority are confirmed on conventional 12-core biopsies, about 20% of these lesions require FgBx for diagnosis, and FgBx more accurately grades the lesions in another 20%. Thus, FgBx is of considerable benefit in confirming the diagnosis of subcapsular prostate cancer despite their proximity to the prostatic capsule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prostate Cancer Home Page—National Cancer Institute. 2014; Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/prostate

  2. George AK, Pinto PA, Rais-Bahrami S (2014) Multiparametric MRI in the PSA screening era. BioMed Res Int 2014:465816

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller BG, et al. (2014) Imaging modalities in focal therapy: patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up. Curr Opin Urol 24(3):218–224

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sankineni S, Osman M, Choyke PL (2014) Functional MRI in prostate cancer detection. Biomed Res Int 2014:590638

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turkbey B, et al. (2011) Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion. BJU Int 107(1):53–57

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nix JW et al (2012) Very distal apical prostate tumours: identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla. BJU Int 110(11 Pt B):E694–E700

  7. Ouzzane A, et al. (2011) Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology 78(6):1356–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Volkin D, et al. (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy increase the detection of anteriorly located prostate cancers. BJU Int 114(6b):E43–E49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenkrantz AB, Verma S, Turkbey B (2015) Prostate cancer: top places where tumors hide on multiparametric MRI. Am J Roentgenol 204(4):W449–W456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barentsz JO, et al. (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Turkbey B, et al. (2011) Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. J Urol 186(5):1818–1824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinto PA, et al. (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 186(4):1281–1285

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohler JL, et al. (2014) Prostate cancer, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 12(5):686–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dianat SS, Carter HB, Macura KJ (2014) Performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of clinically low-risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 32(1):39.e1–10

  15. Lawrentschuk N, Fleshner N (2009) The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels. BJU Int 103(6):730–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng L, et al. (2005) Anatomic distribution and pathologic characterization of small-volume prostate cancer (< 0.5 ml) in whole-mount prostatectomy specimens. Mod Pathol 18(8):1022–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walton Diaz A, et al. (2013) Can magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy improve cancer detection in enlarged prostates? J Urol 190(6):2020–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baris Turkbey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sankineni, S., George, A.K., Brown, A.M. et al. Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy. Abdom Imaging 40, 2557–2565 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0426-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0426-8

Keywords

Navigation