Skip to main content
Log in

Is the nonlipomatous component of dedifferentiated liposarcoma always soft tissue on CT? Analysis of CT densities and correlation with rate of growth in 60 patients

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To define the various CT densities of nonlipomatous component of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) and to determine if the rate of growth varies with density.

Methods

This study identified 60 patients with DDPLS (38 men, 22 women; mean age at diagnosis 59 years, range, 35–82 years) who had one or more resections. CT scan immediately before the surgical resection (presurgery) and up to a maximum of one year before the surgery (baseline) was reviewed by two radiologists to note the density of the nonlipomatous elements and rate of growth during that period. Clinical and histopathological data were extracted from electronic medical records. Rate of growth of various densities was compared using Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

Three distinct densities of the nonlipomatous component were noted: soft tissue density (SD), fluid density (FD), and mixed density (MD). Of 109 lesions on the presurgery scan (SD = 78; MD = 22; FD = 9), scans at baseline were available for 72/109 lesions (SD = 49; MD = 14; FD = 9). Median growth rate/month without treatment, with chemotherapy, and with radiotherapy were 40%, 24%, and 62%, respectively, for SD lesions and 28%, 61%, and 52% for MD lesions. For FD lesions, it was 72% and 35%, respectively, without treatment and with chemotherapy. There was no statistical difference in the rate of growth of various densities. Density changed over time in 8/72 (11%) lesions, including 2/49 SD lesions (to MD), 1/14 MD lesions (to SD), and 5/9 FD lesions (to SD).

Conclusions

DDLPS has three distinct CT densities of which soft tissue density is the most common. Despite not being statistically significant, fluid density lesions had rapid growth rate and often converted to soft tissue density in our study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Regan KN, Jagannathan J, Krajewski K, et al. (2011) Imaging of liposarcoma: classification, patterns of tumor recurrence, and response to treatment. Am J Roentgenol 197:W37–W43

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henricks WH, Chu YC, Goldblum JR, Weiss SW (1997) Dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a clinicopathological analysis of 155 cases with a proposal for an expanded definition of dedifferentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 21:271–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lahat G, Anaya DA, Wang X, et al. (2008) Resectable well-differentiated versus dedifferentiated liposarcomas: two different diseases possibly requiring different treatment approaches. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1585–1593

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghadimi MP, Al-Zaid T, Madewell J, et al. (2011) Diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma systemic metastasis. Annals of surgical oncology 18:3762–3770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keung E, Hornick JL, Bertagnolli MM, Baldini EH, Raut CP (2013) Predictors of Outcomes in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Undergoing Surgery. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):206–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim EY, Kim SJ, Choi D, et al. (2008) Recurrence of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: imaging findings and growth rates at follow-up CT. Am J Roentgenol 191:1841–1846

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hong SH, Kim KA, Woo OH, et al. (2010) Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of retroperitoneum: spectrum of imaging findings in 15 patients. Clin Imaging 34:203–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tateishi U, Hasegawa T, Beppu Y, Satake M, Moriyama N (2003) Primary dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum. Prognostic significance of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:799–804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gronchi A, De Paoli A, Dani C, et al. (2013) Preoperative chemo-radiation therapy for localised retroperitoneal sarcoma: A phase I-II study from the Italian Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 50(4):784–792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawlik TM, Pisters PW, Mikula L, et al. (2006) Long-term results of two prospective trials of preoperative external beam radiotherapy for localized intermediate- or high-grade retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 13:508–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pisters PWT, Ballo MT, Fenstermacher MJ, et al. (2003) Phase I Trial of Preoperative Concurrent Doxorubicin and Radiation Therapy, Surgical Resection, and Intraoperative Electron-Beam Radiation Therapy for Patients With Localized Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 21:3092–3097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sree Harsha Tirumani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tirumani, S.H., Wagner, A.J., Tirumani, H. et al. Is the nonlipomatous component of dedifferentiated liposarcoma always soft tissue on CT? Analysis of CT densities and correlation with rate of growth in 60 patients. Abdom Imaging 40, 1248–1254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0267-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0267-x

Keywords

Navigation