Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonenhanced renal MR angiography using steady-state free precession (SSFP) and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP): repeatability and comparison of different tagging location

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively determine the repeatability of noncontrast-enhanced renal arterial angiography with steady-state free precession (SSFP) and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP), and to compare the visibility of renal artery and its branches when different locations of tagging pulse were placed.

Methods

Thirty-six young healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study and were twice examined by noncontrast-enhanced renal arterial angiography with SSFP and Time-SLIP in 1.5T MR scanner. Measurement error and repeatability were assessed for each of the five major parameters [vessel-to-kidney ratio (VKR), grade of renal arterial branching, grading of image quality, diameter and area of the main renal artery] using the Bland–Altman plot. Two independent observers recorded the values of the parameters; Inter- and intra-observer agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The same parameters, acquired at the tagging pulse placed just above the superior poles of both kidneys or closer to the main renal arteries, were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

Grading of arterial branching by the Time-SLIP SSFP was satisfactorily reproducible with the mean score of greater 3.83 indicating the visibility of branches within the renal parenchyma. The image quality was excellent for Segment I (the main trunk of renal artery) and good for Segment II (segmental branches pre renal parenchyma) and III (vessels within the renal parenchyma) with a satisfying repeatability between two examinations and a good inter- and intra-observer agreement. The ICCs for the inter- and intra-observer measurements of both diameter and area of the main arteries ranged from 0.781 to 0.934, indicating very good agreement. The repeatability of VKR was poor between the two examinations and at the two different tagging pulse locations. The position of tagging pulse in the origination of the main renal arteries was better than in the superior poles of kidneys as it provided a better visualization of arterial branches.

Conclusion

Noncontrast-enhanced renal artery angiography with SSFP and Time-SLIP yields reliable and reproducible visualization of normal renal arteries. Localization of the tagging pulse closer to the main renal arteries provides better visibility of renal artery and its branches than the tag placement just above the superior poles of both kidneys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Granata A, Fiorini F, Andrulli S, et al. (2009) Doppler ultrasound and renal artery stenosis: an overview. J Ultrasound 12:133–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Plouin PF, Rossignol P, Bobrie G (2001) Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: to treat conservatively, to dilate, to stent, or to operate? J Am Soc Nephrol 12:2190–2196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloch MJ, Basile J (2003) The diagnosis and management of renovascular disease: a primary care perspective. Part I. Making the diagnosis. J Clin Hypertens 5:210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Safian RD, Textor SC (2001) Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 344:431–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Young N, Chi KK, Ajaka J, et al. (2002) Complications with outpatient angiography and interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25:123–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. (2001) Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 135:401–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleischmann D (2003) Multiple detector-row CT angiography of the renal and mesenteric vessels. Eur J Radiol 45(Suppl 1):S79–S87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittal TK, Evans C, Perkins T, Wood AM (2001) Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography: clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls. Br J Radiol 74:495–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiragami K, Fujii Z, Sakumura T, et al. (2008) Effect of a contrast agent on long-term renal function and the efficacy of prophylactic hemodiafiltration. Circ J 72:427–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawashima S, Takano H, Iino Y, Takayama M, Takano T (2006) Prophylactic hemodialysis does not prevent contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Circ J 70:553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg SM, et al. (2000) Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet 356:1000–1001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K, et al. (2006) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:2359–2362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Argalia G, Cacciamani L, Fazi R, Salera D, Giuseppetti GM (2004) Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparison with MR-angiography. La Radiologia Medica 107:208–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borrello JA, Li D, Vesely TM, et al. (1995) Renal arteries: clinical comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiographic sequences and radiographic angiography. Radiology 197:793–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Loubeyre P, Trolliet P, Cahen R, et al. (1996) MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:489–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaandorp DW, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kemerink GJ, van Engelshoven JM (2000) Motion of the proximal renal artery during the cardiac cycle. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:924–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Stuber M, et al. (2005) Free-breathing renal magnetic resonance angiography with steady-state free-precession and slab-selective spin inversion combined with radial k-space sampling and water-selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 53:1228–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miyazaki M, Takai H, Sugiura S, et al. (2003) Peripheral MR angiography: separation of arteries from veins with flow-spoiled gradient pulses in electrocardiography-triggered three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo imaging. Radiology 227:890–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber OM, Martin AJ, Higgins CB (2003) Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 50:1223–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coenegrachts KL, Hoogeveen RM, Vaninbroukx JA, et al. (2004) High-spatial-resolution 3D balanced turbo field-echo technique for MR angiography of the renal arteries: initial experience. Radiology 231:237–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia DM, Duhamel G, Alsop DC (2005) Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 54:366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Utsunomiya D, Miyazaki M, Nomitsu Y, et al. (2008) Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Circ J 72:1627–1630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. (2007) Navigator-gated MR angiography of the renal arteries: a potential screening tool for renal artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:W540–W546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aytac SK, Yigit H, Sancak T, Ozcan H (2003) Correlation between the diameter of the main renal artery and the presence of an accessory renal artery: sonographic and angiographic evaluation. J Ultrasound Med 22:433–439 (quiz 440–432)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Jochims M, et al. (2002) Comparison of gradient-echo and steady state free precession sequences for 3D-navigator MR angiography of coronary arteries. RoFo 174:725–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Spuentrup E, Katoh M, Buecker A, et al. (2004) Free-breathing 3D steady-state free precession coronary MR angiography with radial k-space sampling: comparison with cartesian k-space sampling and cartesian gradient-echo coronary MR angiography: pilot study. Radiology 231:581–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T, et al. (2009) Unenhanced MR portography with a half-Fourier fast spin-echo sequence and time-space labeling inversion pulses: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:106–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T, et al. (2009) Non-contrast-enhanced hepatic MR angiography with true steady-state free-precession and time spatial labeling inversion pulse: optimization of the technique and preliminary results. Eur J Radiol 70:111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T, et al. (2009) Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography for selective visualization of the hepatic vein and inferior vena cava with true steady-state free-precession sequence and time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:474–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Satogami N, Okada T, Koyama T, et al. (2009) Visualization of external carotid artery and its branches: non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using balanced steady-state free-precession sequence and a time-spatial labeling inversion pulse. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:678–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wheaton AJ, Miyazaki M (2012) Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: physical principles. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:286–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Herborn CU, Watkins DM, Runge VM, et al. (2006) Renal arteries: comparison of steady-state free precession MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 239:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanki A, Ito K, Tamada T, et al. (2013) Corticomedullary differentiation of the kidney: evaluation with noncontrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRI with time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP). J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1178–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parienty I, Rostoker G, Jouniaux F, et al. (2011) Renal artery stenosis evaluation in chronic kidney disease patients: nonenhanced time-spatial labeling inversion-pulse three-dimensional MR angiography with regulated breathing versus DSA. Radiology 259:592–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu JL, Shi DP, Li YL, et al. (2011) Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery using inflow-sensitive inversion recovery pulse sequence: a prospective comparison with enhanced CT angiography. Eur J Radiol 80:e57–e63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wyttenbach R, Braghetti A, Wyss M, et al. (2007) Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 245:186–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Miyazaki M, Akahane M (2012) Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: established techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All of the authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 20 Cha-Zhong Road, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China

    Yuyang Zhang, Zhen Xing, Ying Liu, Dejun She, Zheng Zeng & Dairong Cao

Authors
  1. Yuyang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhen Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ying Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dejun She
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zheng Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dairong Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dairong Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Xing, Z., Liu, Y. et al. Nonenhanced renal MR angiography using steady-state free precession (SSFP) and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP): repeatability and comparison of different tagging location. Abdom Imaging 39, 1000–1008 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0126-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0126-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation