Skip to main content
Log in

Perilesional enhancement of liver cavernous hemangiomas in magnetic resonance imaging

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the occurrence rate of temporal perilesional parenchymal enhancement (PPE) associated with hepatic hemangiomas in a large consecutive series and to determine which aspects are associated with this observation.

Materials and methods

Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A computerized search of the MRI database was performed for consecutive patients between January 2008 and January 2012. The study population included 513 liver hemangiomas in 224 patients (104 males and 120 females; mean age of 55.2 ± 13.5 years; age range 24–89 years). Two readers independently reviewed the frequency of PPE, size, speed of enhancement and location of each hemangioma. Marginal models with generalized estimating equation were used. Wald test was applied to verify if the model coefficients were significant.

Results

80/513 (15.6%) hemangiomas showed PPE. The incidence of PPE was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in hemangiomas with Type1 speed of enhancement (51/80, 63.8%) than in those with Type2 or Type3. 66/80 (82.5%) hemangiomas with PPE were subcapsular (p < 0.05). Conversely, the majority (280/433, 64.7%) of hemangiomas without PPE were deep in location (p < 0.001). Lesser proportion of hemangiomas with PPE was located in segment IVa (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

PPE is not uncommonly seen along with hepatic hemangiomas. This appearance is most frequently observed in rapidly enhancing small lesions with a subcapsular location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karhunen PJ (1986) Benign hepatic tumours and tumour like conditions in men. J Clin Pathol 39:183–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramalho M, Altun E, Herédia V, Zapparoli M, Semelka R (2007) Liver MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:321–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vilgrain V, Uzan F, Brancatelli G, et al. (2003) Prevalence of hepatic hemangioma in patients with focal nodular hyperplasia: MR imaging analysis. Radiology 229:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caseiro-Alves F, Brito J, Araújo AE, et al. (2007) Liver haemangioma: common and uncommon findings and how to improve de differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 17:1544–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Semelka RC, Brown ED, Ascher SM, et al. (1994) Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 192:401–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim WK, Kim AY, Kim SY, et al. (2006) Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt: sonographic appearances with CT and MRI correlation. AJR 187:406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme MP, et al. (2000) Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 20:379–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YH, Shin SS, Burke LMB, et al. (2010) Hepatic subcapsular hemangioma with perilesional enhancement: MRI features. Radiol Bras 43:384–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Byun JH, Kim TK, Lee CW, et al. (2004) Arterioportal shunt: prevalence in small hemangiomas versus that in hepatocellular carcinomas 3 cm or smaller at two-phase helical CT. Radiology 232:354–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeong MG, Yu JS, Kim KW (2000) Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: temporal peritumoral enhancement during multiphase dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 216:692–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu JS, Kim KW, Sung KB, Lee JT, Yoo HS (1997) Small arterio-portal venous shunts: a cause of pseudolesions at hepatic imaging. Radiology 203:737–742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li C, Chen R, Chen W, et al. (2003) Temporal peritumoral enhancement of hepatic cavernous hemangioma: findings at multiphase dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:854–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim KW, Kim TK, Han JK, et al. (2001) Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt; findings at two-phase CT. Radiology 219:707–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goncalves Neto JA, Altun E, Vaidean G, et al. (2009) Early contrast enhancement of the liver: exact description of subphases using MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 27:792–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Itai Y, Matsui O (1997) Blood flow and liver imaging. Radiology 202:306–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu JS, Rofsky NM (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of arterioportal shunts in the liver. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamashita Y, Ogata I, Urata J, Takahashi M (1997) Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: pathologic correlation with dynamic CT findings. Radiology 203:121–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bookstein JJ, Cho KJ, Davis GB, et al. (1982) Arterioportal communications: observations and hypotheses concerning transsinusoidal and transvasal types. Radiology 142:581–590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lane MJ, Jeffrey RB Jr, Katz DS (2000) Spontaneous intrahepatic vascular shunts. AJR 174:125–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Michels NA (1966) Newer anatomy of the liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation. Am J Surg 112:337–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Honjo K, et al. (1997) Biphasic contrast-enhanced multisection dynamic MR imaging of the liver: potential pitfalls. Radiographics 17:693–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi BI, Chung JW, Itai Y, et al. (1999) Hepatic abnormalities related to blood flow: evaluation with dual-phase helical CT. Abdom Imaging 24:340–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito K, Honjo K, Fujita T, et al. (1996) Hepatic parenchymal hyperperfusion abnormalities detected with multisection dynamic MR imaging: appearance and interpretation. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:861–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Ramalho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sousa, M.S.C., Ramalho, M., Herédia, V. et al. Perilesional enhancement of liver cavernous hemangiomas in magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 39, 722–730 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0100-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0100-6

Keywords

Navigation