Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal flip angle of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate optimal flip angle (FA) of three-dimensional fat-suppressed T1-weighted image on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.

Methods

Forty-five patients with 35 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 16 liver metastases (METs) were investigated. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), tumor-to-liver contrast (TLC) of HCC and MET, visual image quality (IQ) and lesion conspicuity (LeCo) were evaluated at hepatobiliary phase with different FAs (FA15°–30°–45°–60° in 13 patients, FA5°–10°–15°–20°–25° in 32 patients).

Results

TLC gradually showed better in range from FA15° to FA60° and FA5° to FA25°, but SNRs gradually decreased. SNR and TLC-MET at FA15° were significantly better than those at FA45° and FA60°. SNR at FA10° was significantly higher than at FA5°, FA20°, and FA25°. TLC-HCC and TLC-MET at FA5° were inferior to other FAs. IQs and LeCos at FA15° and FA30° were superior to those at FA45° and FA60°. IQs at FA5° and FA25° were significantly lower than those at FA10°–20°, although LeCos for HCC and MET at FA25° were superior to those at FA5°–20°.

Conclusions

FA ranging from 10° to 20° is suitable for hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, to image HCC and MET.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okada M, Imai Y, Kim T, et al. (2010) Comparison of enhancement patterns of histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma between gadoxetate- and ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:903–913. doi:10.1002/jmri.22333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, et al. (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230:266–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamada A, Hara T, Li F, et al. (2011) Quantitative evaluation of liver function with use of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 260:727–733. doi:10.1148/radiol.11100586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katsube T, Okada M, Kumano S, et al. (2011) Estimation of liver function using T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 46:277–283. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318200f67d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tschirch FT, Struwe A, Petrowsky H, et al. (2008) Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with liver cirrhosis: visualization of the biliary ducts in comparison with patients with normal liver parenchyma. Eur Radiol 18:1577–1586. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0929-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee MS, Lee JY, Kim SH, et al. (2011) Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for biliary and vascular evaluations in preoperative living liver donors: comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:149–159. doi:10.1002/jmri.22429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mangold S, Bretschneider C, Fenchel M, et al. (2012) MRI for evaluation of potential living liver donors: a new approach including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 37:244–251. doi:10.1007/s00261-011-9736-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haradome H, Grazioli L, Al manea K, et al. (2012) Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced hepatocyte phase MRI: can increasing the flip angle improve focal liver lesion detection? J Magn Reson Imaging 35:132–139. doi:10.1002/jmri.22805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bashir MR, Merkle EM (2011) Improved liver lesion conspicuity by increasing the flip angle during hepatocyte phase MR imaging. Eur Radiol 21:291–294. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1917-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Okada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okada, M., Wakayama, T., Yada, N. et al. Optimal flip angle of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis. Abdom Imaging 39, 694–701 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0096-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0096-y

Key words:

Navigation