Abstract
Until recently, most solid renal neoplasms without macroscopic fat were presumed to represent renal cell carcinoma and were indiscriminately treated with nephrectomy. Expanding surgical options and ablative technologies, a growing acceptance of renal mass biopsy, the advent of targeted molecular agents, and advances in our understanding of tumor biology have challenged the wisdom of this approach and are ushering in a potential new era in which therapy is linked to histologic subtype and cytogenetics. This approach mandates evolution of our diagnostic algorithm beyond the distinction between solid and cystic and enhancing and nonenhancing. Computed tomography (CT) has traditionally been the imaging technique of choice for evaluating potential solid renal tumors, in large part due to its widespread availability, high spatial resolution, calcium discrimination, and multiphase, enhanced imaging capabilities. For the most part, however, CT is limited to characterization based upon the attenuation and enhancement characteristics of a lesion and necessitates exposure of patients to ionizing radiation. For these latter reasons, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being increasingly used to characterize solid renal masses. The purpose of this manuscript is to review our imaging approach to solid renal masses in adults utilizing MRI with an emphasis on a multiparametric approach augmented by clinical data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166(1):6–18
Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et al. (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366(10):883–892. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113205
Jayson M, Sanders H (1998) Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51(2):203–205
Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56(1):58–62
Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T, et al. (2004) MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: its role in determining cell type. Radiat Med 22(6):371–376
Rosenkrantz AB, Raj S, Babb JS, Chandarana H (2012) Comparison of 3D two-point Dixon and standard 2D dual-echo breath-hold sequences for detection and quantification of fat content in renal angiomyolipoma. Eur J Radiol 81(1):47–51. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.012
Pedrosa I, Sun MR, Spencer M, et al. (2008) MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with findings at surgery and pathologic analysis. Radiographics 28(4):985–1003. doi:10.1148/rg.284065018
Wang H, Cheng L, Zhang X, et al. (2010) Renal cell carcinoma: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for subtype differentiation at 3.0 T. Radiology 257(1):135–143. doi:10.1148/radiol.10092396
Yoshida S, Masuda H, Ishii C, et al. (2011) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(1):110–116. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4632
Nguyen DD, Rakita D (2013) Renal lymphoma: MR appearance with diffusion-weighted imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37(5):840–842. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a55d0a
Sun MR, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes—correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 250(3):793–802. doi:10.1148/radiol.2503080995
Raman SP, Hruban RH, Fishman EK (2012) Beyond renal cell carcinoma: rare and unusual renal masses. Abdom Imaging 37(5):873–884. doi:10.1007/s00261-012-9903-5
Medeiros LJ, Palmedo G, Krigman HR, Kovacs G, Beckwith JB (1999) Oncocytoid renal cell carcinoma after neuroblastoma: a report of four cases of a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Am J Surg Pathol 23(7):772–780
Sacco E, Pinto F, Sasso F, et al. (2009) Paraneoplastic syndromes in patients with urological malignancies. Urol Int 83(1):1–11. doi:10.1159/000224860
Wagner S, Greco F, Hamza A, et al. (2009) Retroperitoneal malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the small pelvis causing recurrent hypoglycemia by secretion of insulin-like growth factor 2. Eur Urol 55(3):739–742. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.050
Zhao G, Li G, Han R (2012) Two malignant solitary fibrous tumors in one kidney: case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 4(5):993–995. doi:10.3892/ol.2012.858
Pickhardt PJ, Lonergan GJ, Davis CJ, Jr, Kashitani N, Wagner BJ (2000) From the archives of the AFIP. Infiltrative renal lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Radiographics 20(1):215–243
Sheth S, Ali S, Fishman E (2006) Imaging of renal lymphoma: patterns of disease with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 26(4):1151–1168. doi:10.1148/rg.264055125
Zhang C, Li X, Hao H, et al. (2012) The correlation between size of renal cell carcinoma and its histopathological characteristics: a single center study of 1867 renal cell carcinoma cases. BJU Int 110(11(Pt B)):E481–E485. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11173.x
Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. (2012) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology 265(2):468–477. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112087
Dunnick NR, Hartman DS, Ford KK, Davis CJ Jr, Amis ES Jr (1983) The radiology of juxtaglomerular tumors. Radiology 147(2):321–326. doi:10.1148/radiology.147.2.6836111
Prasad SR, Humphrey PA, Menias CO, et al. (2005) Neoplasms of the renal medulla: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 25(2):369–380. doi:10.1148/rg.252045073
Katabathina VS, Vikram R, Nagar AM, et al. (2010) Mesenchymal neoplasms of the kidney in adults: imaging spectrum with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 30(6):1525–1540. doi:10.1148/rg.306105517
Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. (2004) The renal sinus: pathologic spectrum and multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics 24(suppl 1):S117–S131. doi:10.1148/rg.24si045503
Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(6):1868–1872
Helenon O, Merran S, Paraf F, et al. (1997) Unusual fat-containing tumors of the kidney: a diagnostic dilemma. Radiographics 17(1):129–144. doi:10.1148/radiographics.17.1.9017804
Wasser EJ, Shyn PB, Riveros-Angel M, et al. (2013) Renal cell carcinoma containing abundant non-calcified fat. Abdom Imaging 38(3):598–602. doi:10.1007/s00261-012-9921-3
Karlo CA, Donati OF, Burger IA, et al. (2013) MR imaging of renal cortical tumours: qualitative and quantitative chemical shift imaging parameters. Eur Radiol 23(6):1738–1744. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2758-x
Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. (1999) MR detection of cytoplasmic fat in clear cell renal cell carcinoma utilizing chemical shift gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 9(4):579–585
Oliva MR, Glickman JN, Zou KH, et al. (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: t1 and t2 signal intensity characteristics of papillary and clear cell types correlated with pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(6):1524–1530. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1727
Wile GE, Leyendecker JR, Krehbiel KA, Dyer RB, Zagoria RJ (2007) CT and MR imaging after imaging-guided thermal ablation of renal neoplasms. Radiographics 27(2):325–339 (Discussion 339–340). doi:10.1148/rg.272065083
Johnson TR, Pedrosa I, Goldsmith J, Dewolf WC, Rofsky NM (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in solitary fibrous tumor of the kidney. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29(4):481–483
Cornelis F, Lasserre AS, Tourdias T, et al. (2013) Combined late gadolinium-enhanced and double-echo chemical-shift MRI help to differentiate renal oncocytomas with high central T2 signal intensity from renal cell carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(4):830–838. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9122
Granter SR, Perez-Atayde AR, Renshaw AA (1998) Cytologic analysis of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 84(5):303–308
Eble JN (1998) Angiomyolipoma of kidney. Semin Diagn Pathol 15(1):21–40
Mittal V, Aulakh BS, Daga G (2011) Benign renal angiomyolipoma with inferior vena cava thrombosis. Urology 77(6):1503–1506. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.039
Quinn MJ, Hartman DS, Friedman AC, et al. (1984) Renal oncocytoma: new observations. Radiology 153(1):49–53
Vargas HA, Chaim J, Lefkowitz RA, et al. (2012) Renal cortical tumors: use of multiphasic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to differentiate benign and malignant histologic subtypes. Radiology 264(3):779–788. doi:10.1148/radiol.12110746
Bastide C, Rambeaud JJ, Bach AM, Russo P (2009) Metanephric adenoma of the kidney: clinical and radiological study of nine cases. BJU Int 103(11):1544–1548. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08357.x
Jung SC, Cho JY, Kim SH (2012) Subtype differentiation of small renal cell carcinomas on three-phase MDCT: usefulness of the measurement of degree and heterogeneity of enhancement. Acta Radiol 53(1):112–118. doi:10.1258/ar.2011.110221
Sasiwimonphan K, Takahashi N, Leibovich BC, et al. (2012) Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging. Radiology 263(1):160–168. doi:10.1148/radiol.12111205
Kim JI, Cho JY, Moon KC, Lee HJ, Kim SH (2009) Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma. Radiology 252(2):441–448. doi:10.1148/radiol.2522081180
Rosenkrantz AB, Hindman N, Fitzgerald EF, et al. (2010) MRI features of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(6):W421–W427. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4718
McGahan JP, Lamba R, Fisher J, et al. (2011) Is segmental enhancement inversion on enhanced biphasic MDCT a reliable sign for the noninvasive diagnosis of renal oncocytomas? AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(4):W674–W679. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6463
Kondo T, Nakazawa H, Sakai F, et al. (2004) Spoke-wheel-like enhancement as an important imaging finding of chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies. Int J Urol 11(10):817–824. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00907.x
Paudyal B, Paudyal P, Tsushima Y, et al. (2010) The role of the ADC value in the characterisation of renal carcinoma by diffusion-weighted MRI. Br J Radiol 83(988):336–343. doi:10.1259/bjr/74949757
Taouli B, Thakur RK, Mannelli L, et al. (2009) Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 251(2):398–407. doi:10.1148/radiol.2512080880
Sufana Iancu A, Colin P, Puech P, et al. (2013) Significance of ADC value for detection and characterization of urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract using diffusion-weighted MRI. World J Urol 31(1):13–19. doi:10.1007/s00345-012-0945-7
Lin C, Luciani A, Itti E, et al. (2010) Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for staging patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur Radiol 20(8):2027–2038. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1758-y
Sandrasegaran K, Sundaram CP, Ramaswamy R, et al. (2010) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(2):438–445. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3024
Tanaka H, Yoshida S, Fujii Y, et al. (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of angiomyolipoma with minimal fat from clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 18(10):727–730. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02824.x
Coleman JA, Russo P (2009) Hereditary and familial kidney cancer. Curr Opin Urol 19(5):478–485. doi:10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832f0d40
Verine J, Pluvinage A, Bousquet G, et al. (2010) Hereditary renal cancer syndromes: an update of a systematic review. Eur Urol 58(5):701–710. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.031
Northrup BE, Jokerst CE, Grubb RL 3rd, et al. (2012) Hereditary renal tumor syndromes: imaging findings and management strategies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1294–1304. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9079
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, B.C., Tirman, P., Jennings Clingan, M. et al. Characterizing solid renal neoplasms with MRI in adults. Abdom Imaging 39, 358–387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0074-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0074-4