Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts: description of MRI and added value of diffusion-weighted MRI

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate MRI features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) and to determine added value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI).

Methods

Twenty-three patients with surgically confirmed invasive (n = 12) and non-invasive (n = 11) IPNB, who underwent preoperative liver MRI were included. Two observers performed consensus review of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and combined gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI including DWI separately, with regard to conspicuity of intraductal tumor using five point scales, extent of tumors, and the presence of invasiveness.

Results

On MRI, there was no significant difference in the conspicuity of intraductal tumors between gadoxetic acid MRI (mean, 4.35) and combined MRI (mean, 4.65) (P = 0.09). However, addition of DWI led seven cases revealed excellent conspicuity as compared with good or moderate conspicuity on gadoxetic acid MRI. With regard to invasiveness, 11 cases (48 %) and 17 (74 %) were correctly diagnosed with gadoxetic acid MRI and combined MRI, respectively (P = 0.06). In invasive tumors, both of the two image sets did not help assess accurate extent of the tumor.

Conclusions

The addition of DWI to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI has a potency to improve conspicuity for intraductal tumors of IPNB and is helpful in determining tumor invasiveness, but not tumor extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen TC, Nakanuma Y, Zen Y, et al. (2001) Intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver associated with hepatolithiasis. Hepatology 34:651–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakanuma Y, Sasaki M, Ishikawa A, et al. (2002) Biliary papillary neoplasm of the liver. Histol Histopathol 17:851–861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimonishi T, Zen Y, Chen TC, et al. (2002) Increasing expression of gastrointestinal phenotypes and p53 along with histologic progression of intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver. Hum Pathol 33:503–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zen Y, Sasaki M, Fujii T, et al. (2006) Different expression patterns of mucin core proteins and cytokeratins during intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis from biliary intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct—an immunohistochemical study of 110 cases of hepatolithiasis. J Hepatol 44:350–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi SC, Lee JK, Jung JH, et al. (2010) The clinicopathological features of biliary intraductal papillary neoplasms according to the location of tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zen Y, Fujii T, Itatsu K, et al. (2006) Biliary papillary tumors share pathological features with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Hepatology 44:1333–1343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. (2004) Clinicopathologic review of 58 patients with biliary papillomatosis. Cancer 100:783–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim JH, Jang KT (2010) Mucin-producing bile duct tumors: radiological–pathological correlation and diagnostic strategy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:223–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim JH, Zen Y, Jang KT, Kim YK, Nakanuma Y (2011) Cyst-forming intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts: description of imaging and pathologic aspects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1111–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim JH, Jang KT, Rhim H, et al. (2007) Biliary cystic intraductal papillary mucinous tumor and cystadenoma/cystadenocarcinoma: differentiation by CT. Abdom Imaging 32:644–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim JH, Jang KT, Choi D (2008) Biliary intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm manifesting only as dilatation of the hepatic lobar or segmental bile ducts: imaging features in six patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:778–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim JH, Yi CA, Lim HK, et al. (2002) Radiological spectrum of intraductal papillary tumors of the bile ducts. Korean J Radiol 3:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim JH, Yoon KH, Kim SH, et al. (2004) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the bile ducts. Radiographics 24:53–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim YK, Kim CS, Lee JM, et al. (2006) Value of adding T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography for detecting intrahepatic biliary stones. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W267–W274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ukaji M, Ebara M, Tsuchiya Y, et al. (2002) Diagnosis of gallstone composition in magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro analysis. Eur J Radiol 41:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Naganawa S, Kawai H, Fukatsu H, et al. (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: technical challenges and prospects for the future. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:175–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. (2008) Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 246:812–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Verslype C, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted MRI provides additional value to conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 19:2456–2466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu JS, Chung JJ, Kim JH, et al. (2011) Detection of small intrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison with conventional dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 29:985–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fukatsu H (2003) 3T MR for clinical use: update. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Nawano S, et al. (2006) Hepatic metastases: diffusion-weighted sensitivity-encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 239:122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boll DT, Merkle EM (2010) Imaging at higher magnetic fields: 3 T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:549–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was not supported by a grant and otherwise.

Conflict of interest

All of the authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Hoon Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, H.J., Kim, Y.K., Jang, KT. et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts: description of MRI and added value of diffusion-weighted MRI. Abdom Imaging 38, 1082–1090 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-9989-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-9989-4

Keywords

Navigation