Skip to main content
Log in

The analysis of enhancement pattern of hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor on contrast-enhanced ultrasound

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the characterization of hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 36 cases of histopathologically diagnosed IPT. Nodule enhancement appearances during the arterial, portal, and delayed phases were defined as hyperenhancement, isoenhancement, hypoenhancement, and non-enhancement compared with the surrounding liver parenchyma. Statistical analysis was performed by the one-way ANOVA and χ 2 tests.

Results

Among total 36 cases, 7 nodules were absent of contrast enhancement during all three phrases on CEUS. Twenty-nine nodules appeared different forms of enhancement in arterial phase. Diffuse homogeneous hyperenhancement, diffuse heterogeneous hyperenhancement, peripheral rim-like enhancement, and diffuse iso-enhancement were found in 10, 12, 5, and 2 of the nodules, respectively. Twenty-five nodules showed hypoenhancement in portal and delayed phases. Four nodules showed contrast washed out synchronously with normal liver parenchyma. The median time to enhancement, median time to peak, and median time to wash out of the nodules were 17 s (range 11–28 s), 23 s (range 14–42 s), and 45 s (range 23–100 s), respectively. No statistical significant differences were found in the above parameters of nodule enhancement and proportion of enhancement patterns when dividing the nodules into subgroups by nodule size.

Conclusion

IPT displays a variety of enhancement patterns due to pathological changes in the course of disease progression. Some characteristics on CEUS may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of IPT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Pack GT, Baker HW (1953) Total right hepatic lobectomy: report of a case. Ann Surg 138(2):253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Torzilli G, Inoue K, Midorikawa Y, et al. (2001) Inflammatory pseudotumors of the liver: prevalence and clinical impact in surgical patients. Hepatogastroenterology 48(40):1118–1123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calomeni GD, Ataíde EB, Machado RR, et al. (2013) Hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor: a case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 4(3):308–311

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YW, Lee JG, Kim KS, et al. (2006) Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver treated by hepatic resection: a case report. Yonsei Med J 47(1):140–143

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon KH, Ha HK, Lee JS, et al. (1999) Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver in patients with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: CT-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 211(2):373–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Balabaud C, Bioulac-Sage P, Goodman ZD, Makhlouf HR (2012) Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: a rare but distinct tumor-like lesion. Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(9):633–634

    Google Scholar 

  7. Someren A (1978) Inflammatory pseudotumour of liver with occlusive phlebitis: report of a case in child and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 69(2):176–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schnelldorfer T, Chavin KD, Lin A, Lewin DN, Baliga PK (2007) Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14(4):421–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, et al. (2013) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver—update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(2):187–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Standiford SB, Sobel H, Dasmahapatra KS (1989) Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver. J Surg Oncol 40(4):283–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito M, Seo Y, Yano Y, et al. (2012) Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography and Ga-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI of hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor: a case report. Intern Med 51(7):723–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Y, Jiang TA, Ao JY, et al. (2010) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of inflammatory pseudotumor of liver. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 39(6):634–637

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koea JB, Broadhurst GW, Rodgers MS, McCall JL (2003) Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: demographics, diagnosis, and the case for nonoperative management. J Am Coll Surg 196(2):226–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giorgio A, De Stefano G, Coppola C, et al. (2007) Contrast-enhanced sonography in the characterization of small hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients: comparison with contrast-enhanced ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Anticancer Res 27(6C):4263–4269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhayana D, Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN, Wilson SR (2010) Hypervascular liver masses on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the importance of washout. AJR 194(4):977–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganesan K, Viamonte B, Peterson M, et al. (2009) Capsular retraction: an uncommon imaging finding in hepatic inflammatory pseudotumour. Br J Radiol 82(984):256–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Ping Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kong, WT., Wang, WP., Cai, H. et al. The analysis of enhancement pattern of hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 39, 168–174 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0051-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0051-3

Keywords

Navigation