Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic pelvic floor imaging: MRI techniques and imaging parameters

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an excellent tool to understand the complex anatomy of the pelvic floor and to assess pelvic floor disorders. MRI enables static and dynamic imaging of the pelvic floor. Using static T2-weighted sequences the morphology of the pelvic floor can be visualized in great detail. A rapid half-Fourier T2-weighted, balanced steady state free precession, or gradient-recalled echo sequence are used to obtain sagittal images while the patient is at rest, during pelvic squeeze, during pelvic strain and to document the evacuation process. On these images the radiologist identifies the pubococcygeal line (PCL) (which represents the level of the pelvic floor). In normal findings, the base of the anterior and the middle compartment are above the PCL at rest, and the pelvic floor elevates during contraction. During straining the pelvic floor muscles should relax and the pelvic floor descends normally less than 3 cm below the PCL. Pelvic floor MRI based on the static and dynamic MRI sequences allows for the detection and characterization of a vast array of morphologic and functional pelvic floor disorders. In this review, we focus on technical aspects of static and dynamic pelvic floor MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeLancey JO (1994) Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170 (6):1713–1720; discussion 1720–1713.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Macura KJ, Genadry RR, Bluemke DA (2006) MR imaging of the female urethra and supporting ligaments in assessment of urinary incontinence: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 26(4):1135–1149. doi:10.1148/rg.264055133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. el-Sayed RF, Morsy MM, el-Mashed SM, Abdel-Azim MS (2007) Anatomy of the urethral supporting ligaments defined by dissection, histology, and MRI of female cadavers and MRI of healthy nulliparous women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1145–1157. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, et al. (2002) Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics 22(4):817–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, et al. (2002) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223(2):501–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, Mortele KJ (2011) Dynamic MR defecography: assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):W394–W399. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kruyt RH, Delemarre JB, Doornbos J, Vogel HJ (1991) Normal anorectum: dynamic MR imaging anatomy. Radiology 179(1):159–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jorge JM, Ger GC, Gonzalez L, Wexner SD (1994) Patient position during cinedefecography. Influence on perineal descent and other measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 37(9):927–931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao SS, Kavlock R, Rao S (2006) Influence of body position and stool characteristics on defecation in humans. Am J Gastroenterol 101(12):2790–2796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with obstructed defaecation. Br J Surg 84(11):1555–1558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 7(8):1309–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA (1991) Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 179(1):25–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pannu HK, Scatarige JC, Eng J (2009) Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33(1):125–130. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318161d739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solopova AE, Hetzer FH, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2008) MR defecography: prospective comparison of two rectal enema compositions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(2):W118–W124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, Graf W (1999) Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology 210(1):103–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher JG, Busse RF, Riederer SJ, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 98(2):399–411. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07235.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Woodfield CA, Krishnamoorthy S, Hampton BS, Brody JM (2010) Imaging pelvic floor disorders: trend toward comprehensive MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1640–1649. doi:10.2214/ajr.09.3670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hetzer FH, Andreisek G, Tsagari C, Sahrbacher U, Weishaupt D (2006) MR defecography in patients with fecal incontinence: imaging findings and their effect on surgical management. Radiology 240(2):449–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dvorkin LS, Hetzer F, Scott SM, et al. (2004) Open-magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 6(1):45–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI, et al. (2001) Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(3):633–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fielding JR, Dumanli H, Schreyer AG, et al. (2000) MR-based three-dimensional modeling of the normal pelvic floor in women: quantification of muscle mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(3):657–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. El Sayed RF, El Mashed S, Farag A, Morsy MM, Abdel Azim MS (2008) Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysis of static and dynamic MR imaging findings. Radiology 248(2):518–530. doi:10.1148/radiol.2482070974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hecht EM, Lee VS, Tanpitukpongse TP, et al. (2008) MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: dynamic true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus HASTE. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):352–358. doi:10.2214/ajr.07.3403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Broekhuis SR, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB (2009) A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(6):721–729. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0848-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(1):71–77. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.113876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Woodfield CA, Hampton BS, Sung V, Brody JM (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(6):695–701. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0865-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fauconnier A, Zareski E, Abichedid J, et al. (2008) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used? Neurourol Urodyn 27(3):191–197. doi:10.1002/nau.20491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL, Gousse AE, Raz S (1999) Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 54(3):454–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Boyadzhyan L, Raman SS, Raz S (2008) Role of static and dynamic MR imaging in surgical pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics 28(4):949–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30(12):1737–1749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, Healy JC, Bartram CI (2000) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(3):661–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferrante SL, Perry RE, Schreiman JS, Cheng SC, Frick MP (1991) The reproducibility of measuring the anorectal angle in defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 34(1):51–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Penninckx F, Debruyne C, Lestar B, Kerremans R (1990) Observer variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Int J Colorectal Dis 5(2):94–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi JS, Wexner SD, Nam YS, et al. (2000) Intraobserver and interobserver measurements of the anorectal angle and perineal descent in defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 43(8):1121–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Minguez M, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, et al. (2004) Predictive value of the balloon expulsion test for excluding the diagnosis of pelvic floor dyssynergia in constipation. Gastroenterology 126(1):57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, et al. (2005) Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 54(4):546–555. doi:10.1136/gut.2004.047696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    Caecilia S. Reiner

  2. Division of Radiology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

    Dominik Weishaupt

Authors
  1. Caecilia S. Reiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominik Weishaupt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caecilia S. Reiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiner, C.S., Weishaupt, D. Dynamic pelvic floor imaging: MRI techniques and imaging parameters. Abdom Imaging 38, 903–911 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9857-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9857-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation