Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 781–787 | Cite as

Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa): dynamic CT, MRI, ultrasonography, and pathologic features—analysis of 7 cases and review of the literature

  • Yan Tan
  • En-hua XiaoEmail author
Article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the dynamic CT, MRI, ultrasonography, and pathologic features of hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), improving the understanding and diagnosis of the tumor.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of CT, MRI, ultrasonography, and pathologic features of 7 hepatic PEComas diagnosed by pathology during 1st January 2005 to 1st September 2011 in our hospital.

Results

The performance of dynamic CT, MRI, and ultrasonography revealed that lesions were regular masses with well-defined borders, the maximum diameters were 2.5–8.5 cm (mean = 4 cm), density was homogeneous, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI showed the lesions were significantly and heterogeneously enhanced on arterial phase, less enhanced on portal venous phase, and slightly hypodense on delayed phase. One patient had multiple hepatic lesions and had delayed enhancement. There were no backgrounds of hepatitis and cirrhosis, enlarged lymph nodes, or distant metastases. Pathology showed the gross appearance of the tumor was smooth. Tumor cells were round or polygonal, with clear boundaries and clear membranes, and had abundant translucent cytoplasm. Nuclei were round, with medium size. Tumor cells were epithelial-like cells and arranged in dense sheets. Immunohistochemistry showed that most of them were positive in HMB45 and MelanA, S-100, SMA, while negative in CgA, Syn, CK, CD117, CD10, and CD34.

Conclusions

Dynamic CT, MRI, ultrasonography, and pathology of PEComa had some characteristics of benign tumor’s performance. Enhanced scan showed PEComa quickly enhanced on arterial phase and enhanced less on portal venous phase. Knowing these characteristics could help to improve the understanding and diagnosis of hepatic PEComa.

Keywords

Hepatic PEComa CT MRI Ultrasonography Pathology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30070235, 30470508, and 30870695; the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, No. 06JJ2008, 07JJ6040.

References

  1. 1.
    Folpe AL, Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, et al. (2002) Neoplasms with perivascular epithelioid differentiation (PEComas). World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press, pp 221–222Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fang SH, Zhou LN, Jin M, et al. (2007) Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the liver: a report of two cases and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 13(41):5537–5539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parfitt JR, Bella AJ, Izawa JI, et al. (2006) Malignant neoplasm of perivascular epithelioid cells of the liver. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130(8):1219–1222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larbcharoensub N, Karnsombut P, Jatchavala J, et al. (2007) Primary hepatic clear cell myomelanocytic tumor. Case report and review of the literature. APMIS 115(12):1454–1459. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.00733.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paiva CE, Moraes Neto FA, Agaimy A, et al. (2008) Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the liver coexisting with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Gastroenterol 14(5):800–802. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.800 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Svajdler M, Bohus P, Goc V, et al. (2007) Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the liver: a case report and review of the literature. Cesk Patol 43(1):18–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalle I, Sciot R, de Vos R, et al. (2000) Malignant angiomyolipoma of the liver: a hitherto unreported variant. Histopathology 36(5):443–450. doi: 10.1046/j.1356-2559.2000.00891.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rouquie D, Eggenspieler P, Algayres JP, et al. (2006) Malignant-like angiomyolipoma of the liver: report of one case and review of the literature. Ann Chir 131(5):338–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strzelczyk JM, Durczynski A, Szymanski D, et al. (2009) Primary perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the liver: Report of a case. Surg Today 39(10):916–921. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-3945-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selvaggi F, Risio D, Claudi R (2011) Malignant PEComa: a case report with emphasis on clinical and morphological criteria. BMC Surg 11:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahn JH, Hur B (2011) Primary perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the liver—a case report and review of the literature. Korean J Pathol 45:S93–S97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zimmermann A, von der Brelie C, Berger B (2008) Primary perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the liver not related to hepatic ligaments: hepatic PEComa as an emerging entity. Histol Histopathol 23(10):1185–1193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akitake R, Kimura H, Sekoguchi S (2009) Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the liver diagnosed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Intern Med 48:2083–2086. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.2133 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yukichi T, Rieko I, Keisuke K, et al. (2000) HMB-45/Melan-A and smooth muscle actin-positive clear-cell epithelioid tumor arising in the ligamentum teres hepatis: additional example of clear cell `sugar’ tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 24(9):1295–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Priola MA, Priola MS, Cataldi A, et al. (2009) Acute abdomen as an unusual presentation of hepatic PEComa. A case report. Tumori 95:123–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martignoni G, Pea M, Reghellin D, et al. (2008) PEComas: the past, the present and the future. Virchows Arch 452:119–132. doi: 10.1007/s00428-007-0509-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Folpe AL, Mentzel T, Lehr HA, et al. (2005) Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) of soft tissue and gynecologic origin: a clinicopathologic study of 24 cases. Mod Pathol 18(1):14AGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hogemann D, Flemming P, Kreip H, et al. (2001) Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology in hepatic angyomyolipoma. Eur Radiol 11:1389–1395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto H, Oda Y, Yao T, et al. (2006) Malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the colon: report of a case with molecular analysis. Pathol Int 56:46–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2006.01919.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lai HY, Chen CK, Ke YH, et al. (2006) Multicentric aggressive angiomyolipomas: a rare form of PEComas. AJR Am J Roentgenol l86(3):837–840. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dimmler A, Seitz G, Hohenberger W, et al. (2003) Late pulmonary metastasis in uterine PEComa. J Clin Pathol 56(8):627–628. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.8.627 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Second Xiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations