Skip to main content
Log in

Early phase detection of bile leak after hepatobiliary surgery: value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MR cholangiography for the detection of bile leaks after hepatobiliary surgery.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with symptoms suggestive of bile leak underwent conventional fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted MR cholangiography followed by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography using gradient-echo (GRE) T2-weighted sequences and fat-suppressed T1-weighted 3D gradient-echo sequences 20 min after an intravenous bolus of Gd-EOB-DTPA. The results of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography correlated with clinical findings, surgical repair, and the results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

Results

The results of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography were negative in 13 patients (cholecystectomy 5, liver transplantation 2, liver resection for focal lesions 2, cholangiocarcinoma 1, and partial hepatectomy after liver injury 1). In 10 patients in whom bile leaks were detected, this complication occurred after liver resection for focal lesions in 3, cholecystectomy in 4, liver transplantation in 2, and liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in 1. The diagnostic accuracy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR for the detection or exclusion of bile leaks was 100%.

Conclusions

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography is a highly reliable technique for the detection of bile leaks after hepatobiliary surgery and may avoid the use of other, potentially risky invasive diagnostic techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLindon JP, England RE, Martin DF (1998) Causes, clinical features and non-operative management of bile leaks. Eur Radiol 8:1602–1607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahatharadol V (2004) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 1522 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 51:12–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marin D, Bova V, Agnello F, et al. (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography for the noninvasive detection of an active bile duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:213–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McArthur C, Unnam S, Felsenstein I (2010) Isolated blunt traumatic gallbladder perforation demonstrated on MDCT and post-cholecystectomy bile leak revealed on Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist) enhanced MRCP. Eur J Radiol 73:e65–e67

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mittal BR, Sunil HV, Bhattacharya A, Singh B (2008) Hepatobiliary scintigraphy in management of bile leaks in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. ANZ J Surg 78:597–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman ML (2003) Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 5:145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoeffel C, Azizi L, Lewin M, et al. (2006) Normal and pathologic features of the postoperative biliary tract at 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging. Radiographics 26:1603–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW, et al. (2009) Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1707–1724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK, et al. (2002) Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani K, et al. (2001) Detection of bile duct leaks using MR cholangiography with mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan). J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:102–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 14:559–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanimoto A, Lee JM, Murakami T, et al. (2009) Consensus report of the 2nd International Forum for Liver MRI. Eur Radiol 19:975–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta RT, Brady CM, Lotz J, Boll DT, Merkle EM (2010) Dynamic MR imaging of the biliary system using hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:405–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takao H, Akai H, Tajima T, et al. (2011) MR imaging of the biliary tract with Gd-EOB-DTPA: effect of liver function on signal intensity. Eur J Radiol 77:325–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tschirch FT, Struwe A, Petrowsky H, et al. (2008) Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with liver cirrhosis: visualization of the biliary ducts in comparison with patients with normal liver parenchyma. Eur Radiol 18:1577–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Connor OJ, O’Neil S, Mahler MM (2011) Imaging of biliary tract disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W551–W558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee J, et al. (2009) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1675–1681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huppertz A, Haraida S, Kraus A, et al. (2005) Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT—initial observations. Radiology 234:468–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zech CJ, Grazioli L, Jonas E, et al. (2009) Health-economic evaluation of three imaging strategies in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI vs. extracellular contrast media-enhanced MRI and 3-phase MDCT in Germany, Italy and Sweden. Eur Radiol 19:753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

To Content’Ed Net Communications, S.L., for editorial assistance and Marta Pulido, MD, for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvaro Alegre Castellanos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alegre Castellanos, A., Molina Granados, J.F., Escribano Fernandez, J. et al. Early phase detection of bile leak after hepatobiliary surgery: value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography. Abdom Radiol 37, 795–802 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9834-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9834-6

Keywords

Navigation