Abstract
Technological advances in the area of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) raised expectations on the potential role of this imaging modality for evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract, especially on Crohn’s disease (CD), based on the high spatial and tissue resolution as well as lack of ionizing radiation. Available evidence indicates that MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of disease activity, location of the lesions, and also for determining the severity of the disease, which together are the main aspects for the therapeutic decision-making in patients with CD. MRI provides a high accuracy in detection of strictures, characterization of fistulizing lesions and extraluminal complications such us abscesses which are a key finding for considering medical and surgical options. Knowledge of the pathological substrate of inflammatory lesions in CD as well as extraenteric lesions may improve diagnostic image interpretation, and thus contribute to optimize patient care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J, et al. (2010) The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 4(1):7–27
Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ, Stoker J (2008) Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology 247(1):64–79
Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al. (2006) Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 16(9):1915–1925
Oussalah A, Laurent V, Bruot O, et al. (2010) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance without bowel preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 59(8):1056–1065
Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Bainbridge A, et al. (2009) Mural inflammation in Crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features. Radiology 252(3):712–720
Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O, et al. (2009) Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut 58(8):1113–1120
Giusti S, Faggioni L, Neri E, et al. (2010) Dynamic MRI of the small bowel: usefulness of quantitative contrast-enhancement parameters and time-signal intensity curves for differentiating between active and inactive Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 35(6):646–653. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9624-6
Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S, et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn’s disease: Validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis. doi:10.1002/ibd.21551
Kleer CG, Appelman HD (2001) Surgical pathology of Crohn’s disease. Surg Clin North Am 81(1):13–30 (vii)
Golder SK, Schreyer AG, Endlicher E, et al. (2006) Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(2):97–104
Horsthuis K, Stokkers PC, Stoker J (2008) Detection of inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic performance of cross-sectional imaging modalities. Abdom Imaging 33(4):407–416. doi:10.1007/s00261-007-9276-3
Zappa M, Stefanescu C, Cazals-Hatem D et al. (2011) Which magnetic resonance imaging findings accurately evaluate inflammation in small bowel Crohn’s disease? A retrospective comparison with surgical pathologic analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17(4):984–993. doi:10.1002/ibd.21414
Harisinghani MG, Wittenberg J, Lee W, et al. (2003) Bowel wall fat halo sign in patients without intestinal disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):781–784
Allez M, Lemann M, Bonnet J, et al. (2002) Long term outcome of patients with active Crohn’s disease exhibiting extensive and deep ulcerations at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 97(4):947–953
Dignass A, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO, et al. (2010) The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: current management. J Crohns Colitis 4(1):28–62
Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK, et al. (2009) Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251(3):751–761
Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, et al. (2006) MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 238(2):517–530
Martinez MJ, Ripolles T, Paredes JM, Blanc E, Marti-Bonmati L (2009) Assessment of the extension and the inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease: comparison of ultrasound and MRI. Abdom Imaging 34(2):141–148
Pilleul F, Godefroy C, Yzebe-Beziat D, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29(8–9):803–808
Magnano G, Granata C, Barabino A, et al. (2003) Polyethylene glycol and contrast-enhanced MRI of Crohn’s disease in children: preliminary experience. Pediatr Radiol 33(6):385–391
Gasche C, Moser G, Turetschek K, et al. (1999) Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Gut 44(1):112–117
Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF (2006) The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut 55(6):749–753. doi:55/6/749
Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(6):1325–1332
Neurath MF, Vehling D, Schunk K, et al. (2002) Noninvasive assessment of Crohn’s disease activity: a comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte scintigraphy with labeled antibodies. Am J Gastroenterol 97(8):1978–1985
Ochsenkuhn T, Herrmann K, Schoenberg SO, et al. (2004) Crohn disease of the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum: detection by MR-enteroclysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 39(10):953–960
Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. (2005) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 54(2):250–256
Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, et al. (2009) Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(1):113–121
Ippolito D, Invernizzi F, Galimberti S, Panelli MR, Sironi S (2010) MR enterography with polyethylene glycol as oral contrast medium in the follow-up of patients with Crohn disease: comparison with CT enterography. Abdom Imaging 35(5):563–570. doi:10.1007/s00261-009-9557-0
Fiorino G, Bonifacio C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. (2011) Prospective comparison of computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography for assessment of disease activity and complications in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17(5):1073–1080. doi:10.1002/ibd.21533
Pascu M, Roznowski AB, Muller HP, et al. (2004) Clinical relevance of transabdominal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease of the terminal ileum and large bowel. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10(4):373–382
Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S, Panes J (2010) Colonic Crohn’s disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity. Abdom Imaging 35(4):422–427. doi:10.1007/s00261-009-9545-4
Schreyer AG, Scheibl K, Heiss P, et al. (2006) MR colonography in inflammatory bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 31(3):302–307
Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Parente F, et al. (2003) Contrast radiology, computed tomography and ultrasonography in detecting internal fistulas and intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 98(7):1545–1555
Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ (2003) Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy–feasibility study. Radiology 229(1):275–281
Florie J, Horsthuis K, Hommes DW, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging compared with ileocolonoscopy in evaluating disease severity in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(12):1221–1228
Tillack C, Seiderer J, Brand S, et al. (2008) Correlation of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14(9):1219–1228
Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17(9):2294–2301
van Gemert-Horsthuis K, Florie J, Hommes DW, et al. (2006) Feasibility of evaluating Crohn’s disease activity at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(2):340–348
Higgins PD, Caoili E, Zimmermann M, et al. (2007) Computed tomographic enterography adds information to clinical management in small bowel Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13(3):262–268. doi:10.1002/ibd.20013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rimola, J., Rodríguez, S., Cabanas, M.L. et al. MRI of Crohn’s disease: from imaging to pathology. Abdom Imaging 37, 387–396 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9797-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9797-7