Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MRI of Crohn’s disease: from imaging to pathology

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technological advances in the area of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) raised expectations on the potential role of this imaging modality for evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract, especially on Crohn’s disease (CD), based on the high spatial and tissue resolution as well as lack of ionizing radiation. Available evidence indicates that MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of disease activity, location of the lesions, and also for determining the severity of the disease, which together are the main aspects for the therapeutic decision-making in patients with CD. MRI provides a high accuracy in detection of strictures, characterization of fistulizing lesions and extraluminal complications such us abscesses which are a key finding for considering medical and surgical options. Knowledge of the pathological substrate of inflammatory lesions in CD as well as extraenteric lesions may improve diagnostic image interpretation, and thus contribute to optimize patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J, et al. (2010) The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 4(1):7–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ, Stoker J (2008) Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology 247(1):64–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al. (2006) Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 16(9):1915–1925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oussalah A, Laurent V, Bruot O, et al. (2010) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance without bowel preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 59(8):1056–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Bainbridge A, et al. (2009) Mural inflammation in Crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features. Radiology 252(3):712–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O, et al. (2009) Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut 58(8):1113–1120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giusti S, Faggioni L, Neri E, et al. (2010) Dynamic MRI of the small bowel: usefulness of quantitative contrast-enhancement parameters and time-signal intensity curves for differentiating between active and inactive Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 35(6):646–653. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9624-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S, et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn’s disease: Validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis. doi:10.1002/ibd.21551

  9. Kleer CG, Appelman HD (2001) Surgical pathology of Crohn’s disease. Surg Clin North Am 81(1):13–30 (vii)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Golder SK, Schreyer AG, Endlicher E, et al. (2006) Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(2):97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Horsthuis K, Stokkers PC, Stoker J (2008) Detection of inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic performance of cross-sectional imaging modalities. Abdom Imaging 33(4):407–416. doi:10.1007/s00261-007-9276-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zappa M, Stefanescu C, Cazals-Hatem D et al. (2011) Which magnetic resonance imaging findings accurately evaluate inflammation in small bowel Crohn’s disease? A retrospective comparison with surgical pathologic analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17(4):984–993. doi:10.1002/ibd.21414

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harisinghani MG, Wittenberg J, Lee W, et al. (2003) Bowel wall fat halo sign in patients without intestinal disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):781–784

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Allez M, Lemann M, Bonnet J, et al. (2002) Long term outcome of patients with active Crohn’s disease exhibiting extensive and deep ulcerations at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 97(4):947–953

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dignass A, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO, et al. (2010) The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: current management. J Crohns Colitis 4(1):28–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK, et al. (2009) Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251(3):751–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, et al. (2006) MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 238(2):517–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinez MJ, Ripolles T, Paredes JM, Blanc E, Marti-Bonmati L (2009) Assessment of the extension and the inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease: comparison of ultrasound and MRI. Abdom Imaging 34(2):141–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pilleul F, Godefroy C, Yzebe-Beziat D, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29(8–9):803–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Magnano G, Granata C, Barabino A, et al. (2003) Polyethylene glycol and contrast-enhanced MRI of Crohn’s disease in children: preliminary experience. Pediatr Radiol 33(6):385–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gasche C, Moser G, Turetschek K, et al. (1999) Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Gut 44(1):112–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF (2006) The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut 55(6):749–753. doi:55/6/749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(6):1325–1332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Neurath MF, Vehling D, Schunk K, et al. (2002) Noninvasive assessment of Crohn’s disease activity: a comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte scintigraphy with labeled antibodies. Am J Gastroenterol 97(8):1978–1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ochsenkuhn T, Herrmann K, Schoenberg SO, et al. (2004) Crohn disease of the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum: detection by MR-enteroclysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 39(10):953–960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. (2005) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 54(2):250–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, et al. (2009) Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(1):113–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ippolito D, Invernizzi F, Galimberti S, Panelli MR, Sironi S (2010) MR enterography with polyethylene glycol as oral contrast medium in the follow-up of patients with Crohn disease: comparison with CT enterography. Abdom Imaging 35(5):563–570. doi:10.1007/s00261-009-9557-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fiorino G, Bonifacio C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. (2011) Prospective comparison of computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography for assessment of disease activity and complications in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17(5):1073–1080. doi:10.1002/ibd.21533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pascu M, Roznowski AB, Muller HP, et al. (2004) Clinical relevance of transabdominal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease of the terminal ileum and large bowel. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10(4):373–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S, Panes J (2010) Colonic Crohn’s disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity. Abdom Imaging 35(4):422–427. doi:10.1007/s00261-009-9545-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schreyer AG, Scheibl K, Heiss P, et al. (2006) MR colonography in inflammatory bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 31(3):302–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Parente F, et al. (2003) Contrast radiology, computed tomography and ultrasonography in detecting internal fistulas and intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 98(7):1545–1555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ (2003) Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy–feasibility study. Radiology 229(1):275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Florie J, Horsthuis K, Hommes DW, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging compared with ileocolonoscopy in evaluating disease severity in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(12):1221–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tillack C, Seiderer J, Brand S, et al. (2008) Correlation of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14(9):1219–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17(9):2294–2301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van Gemert-Horsthuis K, Florie J, Hommes DW, et al. (2006) Feasibility of evaluating Crohn’s disease activity at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(2):340–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Higgins PD, Caoili E, Zimmermann M, et al. (2007) Computed tomographic enterography adds information to clinical management in small bowel Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13(3):262–268. doi:10.1002/ibd.20013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Rimola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rimola, J., Rodríguez, S., Cabanas, M.L. et al. MRI of Crohn’s disease: from imaging to pathology. Abdom Imaging 37, 387–396 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9797-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9797-7

Key words

Navigation