Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of pineapple juice with gadopentetate dimeglumine as a negative oral contrast for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a multicentric study

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of pineapple juice with gadopentetate dimeglumine as a negative oral contrast agent for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Images were obtained before and after the intake of a negative oral contrast agent. Images obtained from six different areas of the biliary tree were analyzed by three different radiologists, who were blind to the exams; scores regarding image quality were given to each area. The statistical analysis showed a significant difference between images before and after the use of the contrast agent (P < 0.001) for the three radiologists (R1–R3). Mean scores given by radiologists before the intake of the contrast agent were 2.49 ± 0.42 (R1), 2.62 ± 0.32 (R2), and 2.22 ± 0.46 (R3). After the intake, mean scores were 3.38 ± 0.62 (R1), 3.48 ± 0.55 (R2), and 2.89 ± 0.69 (R3). The ducts that showed the highest scores were the common bile duct and duct of Wirsung, the distal portion of the common bile duct and the cystic duct. We suggest herein that the contrast agent pineapple juice with gadopentate dimeglumine constitutes an efficient negative oral contrast agent for MRCP, for it efficiently eliminates the signal of the digestive tube in MRCP images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dooms GC, Fisher MR, Higgins CB, et al. (1986) MR imaging of the dilated biliary tract. Radiology 158(2):337–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM (1991) Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 181(3):805–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al. (1992) Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 183(2):578–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, et al. (2007) Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 17(1):241–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pisani JC, Bacelar A, Malafaia O, et al. (2001) Comparative study between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of the pancreatic and biliary obstruction. Arq Gastroenterol 38(3):149–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaishali MD, Agarwal AK, Upadhyaya DN, et al. (2004) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in obstructive jaundice. J Clin Gastroenterol 38(10):887–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Asbach P, Dewey M, Klessen C, et al. (2006) Respiratory-triggered MRCP applying parallel acquisition techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(5):1095–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW, et al. (1996) Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 200(1):85–89

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207(1):21–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Franklin KJ, et al. (2000) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography—a case–control study. Radiology 215(1):71–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soto JA, Barish MA, Ferrucci JT (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of the bile ducts. Semin Roentgenol 32(3):188–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Calculli L, Pezzilli R, Fiscaletti M, et al. (2008) Exocrine pancreatic function assessed by secretin cholangio-Wirsung magnetic resonance imaging. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 7(2):192–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernardino ME, Weinreb JC, Mitchell DG, Small WC, Morris M (1994) Safety and optimum concentration of a manganese chloride-based oral MR contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging 4(6):872–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pels Rijcken TH, Davis MA, Ros PR (1994) Intraluminal contrast agents for MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging 4(3):291–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bisset GS III, Strife JL, McCloskey J (1989) MR imaging of coronary artery aneurysms in a child with Kawasaki disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152(4):805–807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saini S, Stark DD, Rzedzian RR, et al. (1989) Forty-millisecond MR imaging of the abdomen at 2.0 T. Radiology 173(1):111–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cory DA, Schwartzentruber DJ, Mock BH (1987) Ingested manganese chloride as a contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 5(1):65–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Mohamed FB, et al. (1991) Comparison of Kaopectate with barium for negative and positive enteric contrast at MR imaging. Radiology 181(2):475–480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. (1996) Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 110(2):589–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karantanas AH, Papanikolaou N, Kalef-Ezra J, Challa A, Gourtsoyiannis N (2000) Blueberry juice used per os in upper abdominal MR imaging: composition and initial clinical data. Eur Radiol 10(6):909–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cordova-Fraga T, de Araujo DB, Sanchez TA, et al. (2004) Euterpe Oleracea (Acai) as an alternative oral contrast agent in MRI of the gastrointestinal system: preliminary results. Magn Reson Imaging 22(3):389–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Espinosa MG, Sosa M, De Leon-Rodriguez LM, et al. (2006) Blackberry (Rubus spp.): a pH-dependent oral contrast medium for gastrointestinal tract images by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 24(2):195–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coppens E, Metens T, Winant C, Matos C (2005) Pineapple juice labeled with gadolinium: a convenient oral contrast for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 15(10):2122–2129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ayuso JR, Ayuso C, Bombuy E, et al. (2004) Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in adult live liver donors with volumetric mangafodipir trisodium enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Liver Transpl 10(11):1391–1397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cavalcanti JS, Oliveira EdL, Santos LPF, et al. (2002) Estudo anatomotopográfico das vias biliares extra hepáticas e do trígono cistohepático. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 17:30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H, et al. (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography and MR urography: improved enhancement with a negative oral contrast agent. Radiology 203(1):281–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sirvanci M, Duran C, Ozturk E, et al. (2007) The value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative assessment of living liver donors. Clin Imaging 31(6):401–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hiraishi K, Narabayashi I, Fujita O, et al. (1995) Blueberry juice: preliminary evaluation as an oral contrast agent in gastrointestinal MR imaging. Radiology 194(1):119–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Riordan RD, Khonsari M, Jeffries J, Maskell GF, Cook PG (2004) Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a preliminary evaluation. Br J Radiol 77(924):991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Luboldt W, Kienzler D, Seemann M, et al. (2000) Synergistic effect between iron and gadolinium in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 12(2):358–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Watson AD, Rocklage SM, Carvlin MJ (1992) Contrast agents. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG (eds) MR imaging. Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chan JH, Tsui EY, Yuen MK, et al. (2000) Gadopentetate dimeglumine as an oral negative gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRCP. Abdom Imaging 25(4):405–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Young SW, Qing F, Rubin D, et al. (1995) Gadolinium zeolite as an oral contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 5(5):499–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubin DL, Falk KL, Sperling MJ, et al. (1997) A multicenter clinical trial of Gadolite Oral Suspension as a contrast agent for MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 7(5):865–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaminsky S, Laniado M, Gogoll M, et al. (1992) Oral contrast media for the magnetic resonance tomography of the abdomen. A clinical trial of the tolerance for gadolinium-DTPA. Rofo 156(1):17–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwizer W, Fraser R, Maecke H, et al. (1994) Gd-DOTA as a gastrointestinal contrast agent for gastric emptying measurements with MRI. Magn Reson Med 31(4):388–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kunz P, Crelier GR, Schwizer W, et al. (1998) Gastric emptying and motility: assessment with MR imaging—preliminary observations. Radiology 207(1):33–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Allard M, Doucet D, Kien P, Bonnemain B, Caille JM (1988) Experimental study of DOTA-gadolinium. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacologic properties. Invest Radiol 23(Suppl 1):S271–S274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Patak MA, Weishaupt D, Frohlich JM, Debatin JF (1999) Sequential fast 3D MRI following oral ingestion of Gd-DOTA: a new means to assess intestinal transit time. J Magn Reson Imaging 10(3):474–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmid MR, Hany TF, Knesplova L, Schlumpf R, Debatin JF (1999) 3D MR gastrography: exoscopic and endoscopic analysis of the stomach. Eur Radiol 9(1):73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Debatin JF (2002) Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing. Abdom Imaging 27(4):410–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, Wesbey GE (1984) Characteristics of gadolinium–DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142(3):619–624

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A, Maris T, Gourtsoyiannis N (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography before and after oral blueberry juice administration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24(2):229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana Avila Duarte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duarte, J.A., Furtado, A.P.A. & Marroni, C.A. Use of pineapple juice with gadopentetate dimeglumine as a negative oral contrast for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a multicentric study. Abdom Imaging 37, 447–456 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9761-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9761-6

Key words

Navigation