Skip to main content
Log in

MDCT artifact related to the intra-scan gravitational flow of opacified luminal fluid (the “Dense Waterfall” sign)

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and characterize a distinctive MDCT artifact related to intra-scan transit of contrast-enhanced luminal fluid, which we term the “dense waterfall”.

Materials and Methods

179 consecutive CT colonography studies were reviewed for the presence of this distinctive artifact within the prepared and distended colon. In addition, a phantom was constructed to reproduce this artifact.

Results

A luminal artifact consisting of a starburst-like cluster of bright arciform streaks was identified within the colon in 23.5% (42/179) of patients and 19.0% (68/358) of series. The artifact was not associated with patient motion, peristalsis, or spasm but was always associated with opacified fluid actively flowing from a higher to lower level relative to the table. The average luminal fluid attenuation was 764 ± 205 HU in cases where the artifact was present, which was unchanged from cases without the artifact (762 ± 204 HU) and was not sufficiently high enough to cause obvious beam-hardening artifact in static fluid. Scans of the phantom simulation reproduced this artifact, confirming its origin.

Conclusions

Active gravitational flow of contrast-enhanced luminal fluid creates a distinctive arciform starburst artifact at MDCT that could be confused with patient motion, spasm, or beam hardening. To our knowledge, this artifact has not been previously described. Although commonly seen at CT colonography due to the specific colonic preparation and distention technique, this artifact can be seen on other abdominal MDCT studies. This artifact would generally not be confused for underlying pathology, but could potentially obscure relevant findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsich J (2003) Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances, 1st edn. Bellingham: SPIE (The International Society for Optical Engineering)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu F, Cuevas C, Moss AA, et al. (2008) Gas bubble motion artifact in MDCT. Am J Roentgenol (AJR) 190:294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. New Engl J Med 357:1403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New Engl J Med 349:2191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritchie CJ, Godwin JD, Crawford CR, et al. (1992) Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT. Radiology 185:37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Daly TR, et al. (2000) Motion artifacts in subsecond conventional CT and electron-beam CT: pictorial demonstration of temporal resolution. Radiographics 20:1675

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perry J. Pickhardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyce, C.J., Vetter, J.R. & Pickhardt, P.J. MDCT artifact related to the intra-scan gravitational flow of opacified luminal fluid (the “Dense Waterfall” sign). Abdom Imaging 37, 292–296 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9731-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9731-z

Key words

Navigation