Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study is to evaluate the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of peritoneal metastases.
Materials and methods
Unenhanced ultrasound and CEUS were conducted in 25 patients who had confident diagnoses of peritoneal metastases after ultrasound-guided biopsies of peritoneum. B-mode sonograms, color Doppler, CEUS pattern and quantitative analysis of blood perfusion in peritoneal metastases were successively evaluated.
Results
Peritoneum became markedly thickened and was well seen as a heterogeneous omental cake at B-mode ultrasound. Color Doppler only detected dotted or strip-like blood flow scattered in the thickened peritoneum and no blood signal was found in any metastatic nodule. At CEUS, the thickened peritoneum enhanced diffusely and parameters of time–intensity curves did not show any significant difference among variant metastases groups. All the metastatic nodules in the peritoneum showed fast radial enhancement and became homogeneous with adjacent parenchyma. These nodules soon became hypoechoic and the contour of the nodule was clearly shown during the wash-out phase. In all the nodules, the time to peak was shorter and peak intensity was higher compared with the peripheral tissue.
Conclusion
CEUS played a good role in the evaluation of microcirculation and angiogenesis of peritoneal metastases and metastatic nodules in thickened peritoneum.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Churg A, Colby TV, Cagle P, et al. (2000) The separation of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations. Am J Surg Pathol 24(9):1183–1200
Phillips P, Gardner E (2004) Contrast-agent detection and quantification. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 8):4–10
Wink MH, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna P, et al. (2007) Ultrasonography of renal masses using contrast pulse sequence imaging: a pilot study. J Endourol 21(5):466–472
Ohlerth S, O’Brien RT (2007) Contrast ultrasound: general principles and veterinary clinical applications. Vet J 174(3):501–512
Garrison RN, Zakaria ER (2005) Peritoneal resuscitation. Am J Surg 190(2):181–185
Albrecht T, Oldenburg A, Hohmann J, et al. (2003) Imaging of liver metastases with contrast-specific low-MI real-time ultrasound and SonoVue. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 3):79–86
Bartolotta TV, Taibbi A, Midiri M, et al. (2009) Focal liver lesions: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 34(2):193–209
Heppner P, Ellegala DB, Durieux M, et al. (2006) Contrast ultrasonographic assessment of cerebral perfusion in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 104(5):738–745
Wei K, Lindner J (2007) Contrast ultrasound in the assessment of patients presenting with suspected cardiac ischemia. Crit Care Med 35(Suppl 5):280–289
Kay DH, Mazonakis M, Geddes C, et al. (2009) Ultrasonic microbubble contrast agents and the transplant kidney. Clin Radiol 64(11):1081–1087
Quaia E (2007) Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol 17(8):1995–2008
Lim A, Cosgrove D (2004) Functional studies. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 8):110–115
Brannigan M, Burns PN, Wilson SR (2004) Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US. RadioGraphics 24(4):921–935
Ding H, Wang WP, Huang BJ, et al. (2005) Imaging of focal liver lesions: low-mechanical-index real-time ultrasonography with SonoVue. J Ultrasound Med 24(3):285–297
Que Y, Tao C, Wang Y, et al. (2009) Nodules in the thickened greater omentum: a good indicator of lesions? J Ultrasound Med 28(6):745–748
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Que, Y., Wang, X., Tao, C. et al. Peritoneal metastases: evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 36, 327–332 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9651-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9651-3