Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence-based practice in radiology: what color is your parachute?

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly, constructive thought is being given to non-interpretive competencies in Radiology training and practice. Two of these are “Practice-Based Learning” and “Systems-Based Practice”. These areas are evolving. It seems likely that, in some way, the paradigm of “Evidence-Based Practice” (EBP) derived from the McMaster/Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) methodology will form part of these new disciplines. This introductory article sets the scene for this Feature Section in Abdominal Imaging consisting entirely of short “Critically Appraised Topics” produced using EBP techniques. It is hoped that this will stimulate further discussion and consideration of the potential role of EBP in radiology education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith GCS, Pell JP (2003) Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma due to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomized controlled trials BMJ 327:1459–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Staunton M, Malone DE (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology. Step 5 (evaluate); caveats, common questions. Radiology 243(2):319–328

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Muir Gray JA, et al. (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sox HC (2007) Preface to the 1988 first edition. In: Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI, (eds). Medical decision making. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, p IX

  5. Welch HG, Lurie JD (2000) Teaching evidence-based medicine: caveats and challenges. Acad Med 75:235–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2-asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242:23–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4-appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242(2):342–354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maher MM, Hodnett PA, Kalra MK (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3, 4-appraise and apply interventional radiology literature. Radiology 242:658–670

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halligan S, Altman D (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4-appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Radiology 243(1):13–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wood BP (1999) What’s the evidence? Radiology 213:635–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. The Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group. (2001) Evidence-based radiology—a new approach to teaching the practice of radiology. Radiology 220(3):566–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins J, de Christenson MR, Gray L, et al. (2002) General competencies in radiology residency training: definitions, skills, education and assessment. Acad Radiol 9:721–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Beek ERJ, Malone DE (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: why and how should we teach it? Radiology 243(3):633–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dermot E. Malone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malone, D.E. Evidence-based practice in radiology: what color is your parachute?. Abdom Imaging 33, 3–5 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9311-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9311-4

Keywords

Navigation