Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound guided intussusception reduction: are we there yet?

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

References

  1. Malone DE (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: an introduction to the series. Radiology 242:12–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2–asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242:23–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Cochrane Collaboration website, http://www.cochrane.org/index0.htm. Accessed May 29, 2007

  4. Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Web site. http://www.cebm.net. Accessed May 29, 2007

  5. Hadidi AT, El Shal N (1999) Childhood intussusception: a comparative study of nonsurgical management. J Pediatr Surg 34:304–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu L, Zhu H, Wang S, Han Y, Wu X, Miao H (2000) Sonographic guidance of air enema for intussusception reduction in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:339–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Choi SH, Jeong YK et al. (2006) Intermittent sonographic guidance in air enemas for reduction of childhood intussusception. J Ultrasound Med 25:1125–1130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peh WC, Khong PL, Chan KL et al. (1996) Sonographically guided hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception using Hartmann’s solution. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1237–1241

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan KL, Saing H, Peh WC et al. (1997) Childhood intussusception: ultrasound-guided Hartmann’s solution hydrostatic reduction or barium enema reduction? J Pediatr Surg 32:3–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Applegate KE (2005) Intussusception of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Blackmore CC, Medina LS, (eds). Evidence-based Radiology. New York: Springer, pp 475–492

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sargent MA, Wilson BP (1991) Are hydrostatic and pneumatic methods of intussusception reduction comparable? Pediatr Radiol 21:346–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zambuto D, Bramson RT, Blickman JG (1995) Intracolonic pressure measurements during hydrostatic and air contrast barium enema studies in children. Radiology 196:55–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Daneman A, Alton DJ, Ein S et al. (1995) Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children—a comparison of perforation with barium and air. Pediatr Radiol 25:81–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiels WE 2nd, Kirks DR, Keller GL et al. (1993) John Caffey Award. Colonic perforation by air and liquid enemas: comparison study in young pigs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:931–935

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khong PL, Peh WC, Lam CH et al. (2000) Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception: technique and demonstration. Radiographics 20:E1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Dermot E. Malone for his valuable advice during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geetika Khanna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khanna, G., Applegate, K. Ultrasound guided intussusception reduction: are we there yet?. Abdom Imaging 33, 38–40 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9310-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9310-5

Keywords

Navigation