Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MRI/MRCP in staging and treatment planning

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of MR imaging in hilar cholangiocarcinoma is to confirm/reach a diagnosis and to assess resectability. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma shows the same signal intensity pattern of peripheral tumors both on T1- and T2-weighted images. On magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images, hilar cholangiocarcinoma appears as a moderately irregular thickening of the bile duct wall (5 mm) with symmetric upstream dilation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. The aim of preoperative investigation in Klatskin tumors typically requires the evaluation of the level of biliary obstruction, the intrahepatic tumor spread, and the vascular involvement; it also needs to show any atrophy–hypertrophy complex. Because of its intrinsic high tissue contrast and multiplanar capability, MR imaging and MRCP are able to detect and preoperatively assess patients with cholangiocarcinoma, investigating all involved structures such as bile ducts, vessels and hepatic parenchyma. The main reason for surgical/imaging discrepancy is represented by the microscopic diffusion along the mucosa and in the perineural space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klatskin G (1965) Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic ducts at its bifurcation with the porta hepatis: an unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med 38:241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander F, Rossi RL, O’Bryan M, et al. (1994) Biliary carcinoma: a review of 109 cases. Am J Surg 147:503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Launois B, Wemyss-Holden S, Maddern GJ (2002) Current and future trends in management and treatment of Klatskin tumour. Int J Clin Oncol 7:91–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson RN, Yeung E, Thompson JN, et al. (1986) Bile duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, cause, and tumor resectability. Radiology 160:43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guthrie JA, Ward J, Robinson PJ (1996) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium enhanced FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 201:347–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1997) HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1501–1505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reinhold C, Bret P, Atri M, et al. (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography:potential clinical application. Radiographics 16:309–320

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adam A, Benjamin IS (1992) Review. The staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Radiol 46:299–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M, et al. (2006) Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 16(10):2317–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Joint Committee on Cancer (2005) AJCC cancer staging. New York: Springer, pp 1–150

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slattery JM, Sahani DV (2006) What is the current state of the art imaging for detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma? Oncologist 11:913–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakanuma Y, Minato H, Kida T, et al. (1994) Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. In Primary liver Cancer in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Springer, pp 39–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhuiya MR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. (1992) Clinicopathologic studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 215:344–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim JH, Park CK (2004) Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29:540–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim JH (2003) Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:819–827

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malhi H, Gores GJ (2006) Review article: the modern diagnosis and therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23:1287–1296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi BI, Lee JM, Han JK (2004) Imaging of intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma 29:548–557

    Google Scholar 

  18. Looser C, Stain SC, Baer HU, Triller J, Blungart LH (1992) Staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasound and duplex sonography: a comparison with angiography and operative findings. Br J Radiol 65:871–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tillich M, Mischinger HJ, Preisegger KH, Rabl H, Szolar DH (1998) Multiphasic Helical CT in Diagnosis and Staging of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:651–658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilkinson M (1996) The art of diagnostic imaging: the biliary tree. J Hepatol 25:5–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. (1976) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10.000 cases. Gastroenterology 70:314–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zech JC, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Helmeberger (2004) Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors:current clinical status and future developments. Eur Radiol 14:1174–1187

  23. Manfredi R, Barbaro B, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Magnetic Resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Seminar Liv Dis 24:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manfredi R, Masselli G, Maresca G, et al. (2003) MR imaging and MRCP of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 28:319–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bismuth H, Corlette MB (1975) Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:170–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F (2001) Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 220:90–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen L, Rondeua Y, Pelletier G (2000) Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures. Gut 46:103–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Manfredi R, Brizi MG, Masselli G, et al. (2001) Malignant Biliary hilar stenosis. MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiol Med 102:48–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Otto G, Romaneehsen B, Bittinger F, et al. (2004) Preoperative imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma:surgical evaluation of standard practices. Z Gastroenterol. 42(1):9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee HY, Kim SH, Lee JM, et al. (2006) Preoperative assessment of respectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma:combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology 239:113–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, et al. (2006) MR imaging and MRCP in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings[Abstract]. Radiol Suppl RSNA 2006:273

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mcfarland EG, Kaufman JA, Saini S, et al. (1996) Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:37–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee GM, Park KB, Shin YM, et al. (2003) Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast enhanced 3D Fast Imaging with steady-state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. World J Surg 7:278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lygidakis NJ, Van der Henden MN, Houthoff HJ (1988) Surgical approaches to the management of primary biliary cholangiocarcinoma of the porta hepatis. The decision making dilemma. Hepatogastroenterology 35:261–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Baer HU, Stain SC, Dennison MD, et al. (1992) Improvement in survival by aggressive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 217:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosai J (1996) Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology, 8th edn. St. Louis: Mosby 914–915, 960

  37. Lygidakis NJ, Sgourakis GJ, Dedemadi GV, Vlachos L, Safioleas M (2001) Long term results following resectional surgery for Klatskin tumors: a twenty-year personal experience. Hepatogastroenterology 48:95–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiology DEA, Umberto I Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

    Gabriele Masselli & Gianfranco Gualdi

Authors
  1. Gabriele Masselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gianfranco Gualdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Masselli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masselli, G., Gualdi, G. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MRI/MRCP in staging and treatment planning. Abdom Imaging 33, 444–451 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9281-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9281-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation