Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Update on uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroid disease (uterine artery embolization)

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcatheter embolization of the uterine arteries for symptomatic fibroid disease has become an increasingly important alternative treatment. It is highly effective and well tolerated by most patients. Most notably, uterine artery embolization is associated with a short recovery period and is uterine sparing. To ensure the best chance for a safe and successful procedure, Interventional Radiologists should have familiarity with uterine artery anatomy, state of the art embolization techniques, and optimal patient selection and post procedure management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Viqneron N, et al. (1995) Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 346:671–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hovsepian DM, Siskin GP, Bonn J, et al. (2004) Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:535–541

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heaston DK, Mineau DE, Brown BJ, et al. (1979) Transcatheter arterial embolization for control of persistent massive puerperal hemorrhage after bilateral surgical hypogastric artery ligation. Am J Roentgenol 133:152–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown BJ, Heaston DK, Poulson AM, et al. (1979) Uncontrollable postpartum bleeding: a new approach to hemostasis through angiographic arterial embolization. Obstet Gynecol 54:361–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vedantham S, Goodwin SC, McLucas B, et al. (1997) Uterine artery embolization: an underused method of controlling pelvic hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:938–948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siskin GP, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Goodwin SC, et al. (2006) A prospective multicenter comparative study between myomectomy and uterine artery embolization with polyvinyl alcohol microspheres: long-term clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1287–1295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, et al. (2006) Administration of goserelin acetate after uterine artery embolization does not change the reduction rate and volume of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril 85:1478–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lohle PN, Boekkooi FP, Smeets AJ, et al. (2006) Limited uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: 1-year follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:283–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spies JB, Bruno J, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, et al. (2005) Long-term outcome of uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 106:933–939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Joffre F, Tubiana JM, Pelage JP, et al. (2004) FEMIC (Fibromes Embolises aux MICrospheres calibrees): uterine fibroid embolization using tris-acryl microspheres. A French multicenter study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:600–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Razavi MK, Wolanske KA, Hwang GL, et al. (2002) Angiographic classification of ovarian artery-to-uterine artery anastomoses: initial observations in uterine fibroid embolization. Radiology 224:707–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nikolic B, Spies JB, Campbell L, et al. (2001) Uterine artery emboization: reduced radiation with refined technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:39–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spies JB, Allison S, Flick P, et al. (2005) Spherical polyvinyl alcohol versus tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: results of a limited randomized comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1431–1437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pelage J-P, Le Dref O, Beregi J-P, et al. (2003) Limited uterine artery embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richter GM, Radeleff B, Rimbach S, et al. (2004) Uterine fibroid embolization with spheric micro-particles using flow guiding: safety, technical success and clinical results. Rofo 176:1648–1657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spies JB, Allison S, Flick P, et al. (2004) PVA particles and tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for UAE for leiomyoma: results of a randomized comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:793–800

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katsumori T, Bamba M, Kobasyashi TK, et al. (2002) Uterine leiomyoma after embolization by means of gelatin sponge particles alone: report of a case with histopathologic features. Ann Diagn Pathol 6:307–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haung LY, Cheng YE, Chang HW, et al. (2004) Quantified short-term outcome of uterine artery embolization with gelatin sponge particles and lipiodol for symptomatic myoma. Fertil Steril 81:1375–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Banovac F, Ascher SM, Jones DA, et al. (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging outcome after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata with use of tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:681–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodwin SC, McLucas B, Lee M, et al. (1999) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata: midterm results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Broder MS, Goodwin S, Chen G, et al. (2002) Comparison of long-term outcomes of myomectomy and uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol 100:864–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McClucas B, Adler L, Perrella R. (2001) Uterine fibroid embolization: non-surgical treatment for symptomatic fibroids. J Am Coll Surg 192:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ravina JH, Aymard A, Ciraru-Viqneron N, et al. (2000) Arterial embolization of uterine myoma: results apropos of 286 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 29:272–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, et al. (2001) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 98:29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Walker WJ, Pelage JP. (2002) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow-up. BJOG 109:1262–1272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Worthington-Kirsch RL, Popky GL, Hutchins FL Jr (1998) Uterine arterial embolization for the management of leiomyomas: quality-of-life assessment and clinical response. Radiology 208:625–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hwang GI, Razavi MK, Chen BH (2001) A single-center study comparing abdominal myomectomy with uterine artery embolization for treatment of myomas [Abstract]. Obstet Gynecol 97 (4 Suppl 1):S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pinto I, Chimeno P, Romo A, et al. (2003) Uterine fibroids: uterine artery embolization versus abdominal hysterectomy for treatment—a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Radiology 226:425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mann P New studies show embolisation better treatment option for uterine fibroids. PR Newswire. Accessible at http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/newsindex.shtml?/cgi/news/release?id=181258

  30. Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Donderwinkel PF, et al. (2005) Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1618–1629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spies JB (2006) The Emmy trial of uterine artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors: randomized, yes, but a flawed trial nonetheless. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:413–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Siskin GP Uterine fibroid embolization. Accessible at http://www.emedicine.com/radio/topic837.htm

  33. Bradley EA, Reidy JF, Forman RG, et al. (1998) Transcatheter uterine artery embolization to treat large uterine fibroids. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:235–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cura M, Cura A, Buqnone A (2006) Role of magnetic resonance imaging n patient selection for uterine artery embolization. Acta Radiol 47:1105–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harman M, Zeteroglu S, Arslan H, et al. (2006) Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging signal and contrast-enhancement characteristics on post-embolization volume reduction of uterine fibroids. Acta Radiol 47:427–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Siskin GP, Stainken BF, Dowling K, et al. (2000) Outpatient uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: experience in 49 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:305–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Klein A, Schwartz ML (2001) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroids: an outpatient procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1556–1563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chrisman HB, West D, Corpuz B, et al. (2005) Primary failure of uterine artery embolization: use of magnetic resonance imaging to select patients for repeated embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1143–1147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Price N, Gillmer MD, Stock A, et al. (2005) Pregnancy following uterine artery embolisation. J Obstet Gynaecol 25:28–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Goldberg J. (2005) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the Ontario Multicenter Trial. Obstet Gynecol 106:195–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Carpenter TT, Walker WJ. (2005) Pregnancy following uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 26 completed pregnancies. BJOG 112:321–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Goodwin SC, Bonilla SC, Sacks D, et al. (2003) Reporting standards for uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14:S467–S476

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ghai S, Rajan DK, Benjamin MS, et al. (2005) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: pre- and postprocedure evaluation with US. Radiographics 25:1159–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nikolic, et al. (2000) Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology 214:121–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Fletcher Allen Health Care, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA

    Christopher S. Morris

Authors
  1. Christopher S. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher S. Morris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, C.S. Update on uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroid disease (uterine artery embolization). Abdom Imaging 33, 104–111 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9187-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9187-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation