Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT

Abstract

Purpose

To audit the accuracy with which pre-operative MRI and multi-detector row CT determine the relationship between rectal tumour and the circumferential resection margin (CRM).

Materials and methods

The MR and CT scans of 72 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were retrieved. The relationship between tumour and the mesorectal fascia was determined by two observers, who classified appearances into three categories: no tumour within 5 mm of the mesorectal fascia; tumour within 5 mm of the mesorectal fascia (‘threatened’ margin); tumour at the mesorectal fascia (‘involved’ margin). Agreement with post-operative histopathology was assessed by Kappa statistics.

Results

There was poor agreement between both MRI and CT, and post-operative histology, both in all 72 patients and in the 42 who had received no pre-operative therapy or short-course radiotherapy only. Both imaging modalities had a tendency to overstage patients whose CRM was uninvolved subsequently. However, the negative predictive value for an uninvolved margin was 81.8% by MRI and 84.6% by CT. There was no patient with an involved margin by histopathology whose imaging had suggested the margin was uninvolved.

Conclusion

Both pre-operative MRI and multi-detector row CT have high negative predictive values for a subsequently uninvolved resection margin.