Skip to main content

Diagnosis of intrahepatic and common duct stones: Combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced helical CT in 1090 patients

Abstract

Background

We determined the accuracy of combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of bile duct stones.

Methods

During a 12-month period, 1090 patients who underwent combined CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTC) were enrolled in this study. The results of prospective CT interpretation regarding the presence of bile duct stones were compared with results of endoscopic stone removal, PTC and with surgical results. In 70 patients, detectability of stones on CT was evaluated depending on stone types.

Results

Of 1090 study patients, 175 and 299 patients were confirmed to have intrahepatic and common duct stones, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of combined CT were 73% and 98% for diagnosis of intrahepatic stones and 71% and 97% for common duct stones. Of 70 patients 24, 25, and 21 patients had cholesterol, black pigment, and brown pigment stones, respectively. Eleven of 24 cholesterol stones, 21 of 25 black pigment stones, and 15 of 21 brown pigment stones were detected on combined CT.

Conclusion

Combined CT is of limited sensitivity for detection of bile duct stones, especially in Western countries where cholesterol stones predominate. It may be of greater value in populations with a higher incidence of pigment stones. Other complementary imaging modalities are needed for patients with negative CT findings who are highly suspected to have biliary stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

References

  1. 1.

    Jeffrey RB, Federle MP, Laing FC, et al. (1983) Computed tomography of choledocholithiasis. AJR 140:1179–1183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Baron RL, Stanley RJ, Lee JKT, et al. (1983) Computed tomographic features of biliary obstruction. AJR 140:1173–1178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baron RL (1987) Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 162:419–424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Soto JA, Alvarez O, Munera F, et al. (2000) Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography. AJR 175:1127–1134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cronan JJ, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, et al. (1983) Prospective diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Radiology 146:467–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gross BH, Harter LP, Core RM, et al. (1983) Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 146:471–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Laing FC, Jeffrey RB (1983) Choledocholithiasis and cystic duct obstruction: difficult ultrasonographic diagnosis. Radiology 146:475–479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Laing FC, Jeffrey RBJ, Wing VW (1986) Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography. AJR 143:949–952

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Varhgese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, et al. (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 55:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pickuth D, Spielmann RP (2000) Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced spiral CT, US, and ERCP. Hepatogastroenterology 47:1514–1517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chan YL, Chan ACW, Lam WWM, et al. (1996) Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 200:85–89

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, et al. (1996) Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. AJR 167:1441–1445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Soong TCL, Lee RC, Cheng HC, et al. (1998) Dynamic MR imaging of hepatolithiasis. Abdom Imaging 23:515–519

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gabata T, Kadoya M, Matsui O, et al. (2000) Intrahepatic biliary calculi: correlation of unusual MR findings with pathologic findings. Abdom Imaging 25:266–268

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kubo S, Hamba H, Hirohashi K, et al. (1997) Magnetic resonance cholangiography in hepatolithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol 92:629–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Neitlich JD, Topazian M, Smith RC, et al. (1997) Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 203:753–757

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Baron RL (1997) Diagnosing choledocholithiasis: how far can we push helical CT? Radiology 203:601–603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cuenca IJ, Martinez LO, Homs MP (2001) Helical CT without contrast in choledocholithiasis diagnosis. Eur Radiol 11:197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Brink JA, Kammer B, Mueller PR, et al. (1994) Prediction of gallstone composition: synthesis of CT and radiographic features in vitro. Radiology 190:69–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bova JG, Schwesinger WH, Kurtin WE (1992) In vivo analysis of gallstone composition by computed tomography. Gastrointest Radiol 17:253–256

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, et al. (1994) Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 192:675–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Van Beers BE, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, et al. (1994) Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. AJR 162:1331–1335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sandstad O, Osnes T, Skar V, et al. (1994) Common bile duct stones are mainly brown and associated with duodenal diverticula. Gut 35:1464–1467

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sandstad O, Osnes T, Skar V, et al. (2000) Brown pigment stones in the common bile duct: reduced bilirubinate diconjugate bile. Scand J Gastroenterol 2:198–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Brakel K, Lameris JS, Nijs HGT, et al. (1990) Predicting gallstone composition with CT: in vivo and in vitro analysis. Radiology 174:337–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Janowitz P, Zoller A, Swobodnik W, et al. (1990) Computed tomography evaluation of radiolucent gallstones in vivo. Gastrointest Radiol 15:58–60

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bernhoft RA, Pellegrini CA, Motson RW, et al. (1984) Composition and morphologic and clinical features of common duct stones. Am J Surg 148:77–85

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Baron RL, Rohrmann CA Jr, Lee SP, et al. (1988) CT evaluation of gallstones in vitro: correlation with chemical analysis. AJR 151:1123–1128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nakayama F, Furusawa T, Nakama T (1980) Hepatolithiasis in Japan; present status. Am J Surg 139:216–220

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Choi TK (1989) Intrahepatic stones. Br J Surg 76:213–214

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Saunders KD, Cates JA, Roslyn JJ (1990) Pathogenesis of gallstones. Surg Clin North Am 70:1197–1216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nakayama F, Koga A (1984) Hepatolithiasis: present status. World J Surg 8:9–14

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kim MH, Sekijima J, Park HZ, et al. (1995) Structure and composition of primary intrahepatic stones in Korean patients. Dig Dis Sci 40:2143–2151

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kim MH, Sekihima J, Lee SP (1995) Primary intrahepatic stones. Am J Gastroenterol 90:540–548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yarmuch J, Csendes A, Diaz JC, et al. (1989) Results of surgical treatment in patients with “Western” intrahepatic lithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 36:128–131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pausawasdi A, Watanapa P (1997) Hepatolithiasis: epidemiology and classification. Hepatogastroenterology 44:314–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ker CG, Huang TJ (1981) Intrahepatic stones; etiological study. J Formosan Med 80:698–711

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Min PC, Cho MH, Im HM, et al. (1966) Biliary tract disease among Koreans. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases. J Korean Surg Soc 8:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Menu Y, Lorphelin JM, Scherrer A, et al. (1985) Sonographic and computed tomographic evaluation of intrahepatic calculi. AJR 145:579–583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yamashita N, Yanagisawa J, Nakayama F (1988) Composition of intrahepatic calculi-etiological significance. Dig Dis Sci 33:449–453

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kobayashi A, Tanimura H (1984) Chemical analysis of intrahepatic gallstones. J Biliary Tract Pancreas 5:1609–1613

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mukaihara S (1981) Chemical analysis of gallstones. classification and composition of human gallstones. Arch Jpn Chir 50:476–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lim JH (1991) Oriental cholangiohepatitis: pathologic, clinical and radiologic features. AJR 157:1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Bonnie Hami, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cleveland, for her editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Kyoung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J.K., Kim, T.K., Byun, J.H. et al. Diagnosis of intrahepatic and common duct stones: Combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced helical CT in 1090 patients. Abdom Imaging 31, 425–432 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9076-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bile ducts, calculi
  • Bile ducts, computed tomography
  • Computed tomography, helical