Skip to main content
Log in

Bowel obstruction: comparison between multidetector-row CT axial and coronal planes

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acute obstruction of bowel is a common reason for presentation to the emergency department. Causes of obstruction are multiple (tumorous, inflammatory, postoperative, or congenital), but the clinical presentation is usually not specific. The abdominal radiographs are sometimes inconclusive, and cause of obstruction is rarely detected. Computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be useful in revealing the site and the cause of obstruction. Although radiologists are skilled in the interpretation of CT scans in the axial plane, the development of multidetector-row CT coupled with fast reconstruction hardware and software has stimulated interest in viewing abdomen in coronal plane. In the evaluation of small bowel obstruction, coronal plane serves as a useful adjunct for the identification of the point of transition from dilated to decompressed bowel. On the other hand, in the evaluation of large bowel obstruction, coronal planes could replace axial images in the evaluation of the site and cause of obstruction, although the best values of confidence level in the diagnosis are reached when interpreting axial combined with coronal images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markes JB, Somers S, Slobodan ER, et al. (1989) Interobserver variation in the interpretation of abdominal radiographs. Radiology 171:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herlinger H, Rubesin SE, Morris JB (2000) Small bowel obstruction. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, (eds.) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 2nd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 815–837

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paulson EK, Jaffe TA, Thomas J, et al. (2004) MDCT of patients with acute abdominal pain: a new perspective using coronal reformations from submillimeter isotropic voxel. AJR 183:899–906

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaffe TA, Martin LC, Thomas J, et al. (2006) Small bowel obstruction: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section multi-detector row CT. Radiology 238:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grassedonio E, Cianci R, Di Fabio F, et al. (2005) Multidetector-row CT in bowel obstruction: comparison of axial and coronal views diagnostic performance (abstr). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook: Radiological Society of North America, p 297

  6. Gazelle GS, Goldberg MA, Wittenberg J, et al. (1994) Efficacy of CT in distinguishing small-bowel obstruction from other causes of small-bowel dilatation. AJR 162:43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maglinte DDT, Gage SN, Harmon BH, et al. (1993) Obstruction of the small bowel: accuracy and role of CT diagnosis. Radiology 188:61–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chou CK, Mak CW, Huang MC, et al. (2000) Differentiation of obstructive from non-obstructive small bowel dilatation on CT. Eur J Radiol 35:213–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchsjager MH (2002) The small bowel feces sign. Radiology 225:378–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Catalano O (1997) The feces sign: a CT findings in small bowel obstruction. Radiology 37:417–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarus DE, Slywotsky C, Bennett GL, et al. (2004) Frequency and relevance of the “small-bowel feces” sign on CT in patients with small-bowel obstruction. AJR 183:1361–1366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Cho KC, et al. (1991) Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology 180:313–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukuya T, Hawes DR, Lu CC, et al. (1992) CT diagnosis of small bowel obstruction: efficacy in 60 patients. AJR 158:765–769

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maglinte DDT, Reyes BL, Harmon BH, et al. (1996) Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. AJR 167:1451–1455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caoili EM, Paulson EK (2000) CT of small bowel obstruction: another perspective using multiplanar reformations. AJR 174:993–998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Furuichi K, et al. (2001) Helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics 21:341–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Menzies D (1992) Peritoneal adhesion: incidence, cause and prevention. Ann Surg 24:29–45

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mucha P (1987) Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 67:597–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinha R, Verma R (2005) Multidetector row computed tomography in bowel obstruction. Part 2. Large bowel obstruction. Clin Radiol 60:1068–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Balthazar EJ (1994) CT of small bowel obstruction. AJR 162:255–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Peck JJ, Milleson T, Phelan J (1999) The role of computed tomography with contrast and small bowel follow-through in management of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 177:375–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, et al. (1992) Closed loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 185:769–775

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burkill GJC, Bell JRG, Healy JC (2001) The utility of computed tomography in acute small bowel obstruction. Clin Radiol 56:350–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scaglione M, Romano S, Pinto F, et al. (2004) Helical CT diagnosis of small bowel obstruction in the acute clinical setting. Eur J Radiol 50:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gollub MJ, Yoon S, McSmith LG, et al. (2006) Does the CT whirl sign really predict small bowel volvulus? Experience in an oncologic population. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Obuz F, Terzi C, Sökmen S, et al. (2003) The efficacy of helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Eur J Radiol 48:299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Balthazar EJ, Liebeskind ME, Macari M (1997) Intestinal ischemia in patients in whom small bowel obstruction is suspected: evaluation of accuracy, limitation, and clinical implications of CT in diagnosis. Radiology 205:519–522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zalcman M, Sy M, Donckier V, et al. (2000) Helical CT signs in the diagnosis of intestinal ischemia in small bowel obstruction. AJR 175:1601–1607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aufort S, Charra L, Lesnik A, et al. (2005) Multidetector CT of bowel obstruction: value of post-processing. Eur Radiol 15:2323–2329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella Filippone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filippone, A., Cianci, R. & Storto, M.L. Bowel obstruction: comparison between multidetector-row CT axial and coronal planes. Abdom Imaging 32, 310–316 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9065-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9065-4

Keywords

Navigation