Skip to main content
Log in

MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Congenital pancreaticobiliary malformations are sometimes associated with acute or chronic pancreatitis and biliary carcinoma. Currently, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is one of the first choices for investigating and diagnosing pancreaticobiliary diseases noninvasively. We compared the accuracy of conventional MRCP and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in making the diagnosis of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformations.

Methods

In patients with pancreas divisum (n = 17), pancreaticobiliary maljunction (n = 12), choledochocele (n = 2), and annular pancreas (n = 1) who underwent ERCP and MRCP, the diagnostic accuracy and findings on MRCP were compared with those on ERCP.

Results

Of the 32 patients with congenital pancreaticobiliary malformations diagnosed on ERCP, 23 (72%) presented the same diagnosis on MRCP. Complete pancreas divisum was diagnosed in 73% on MRCP based on the finding of a dominant dorsal pancreatic duct crossing the lower bile duct and emptying into the duodenum without communicating with the ventral pancreatic duct. Pancreaticobiliary maljunction was diagnosed in 75% on MRCP based on the finding of an anomalous union between the common bile duct and the pancreatic duct and the existence of a long common channel.

Conclusions

Conventional MRCP is a useful, noninvasive tool for diagnosing congenital pancreaticobiliary malformations; and the diagnostic accuracy can be increased with three-dimensional MRCP or dynamic MRCP with secretin stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamisawa T, Egawa N, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Matsukawa M (2005) Pancreatitis associated with congenital abnormalities of the pancreaticobiliary system. Hepatogastroenterology 52:223–229

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamisawa T (2004) Clinical significance of the minor duodenal papilla and accessory pancreatic duct. J Gastroenterol 39:605–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamisawa T, Matsukawa M, Amemiya K, Tu Y, Ehgawa N, Okamoto A, Aizawa S (2003) Pancreatitis associated with pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1665–1668

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamisawa T, Amemiya K, Tu Y, Egawa N, Sakaki N, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Munakata A (2002) Clinical significance of a long common channel. Pancreatology 2:122–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamisawa T, Yoshiike M, Egawa N, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Matsukawa M (2005) Classification of choledochocele. Hepatogastroenterology 52:29–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiernan PD, ReMine SG, Kiernan PC, ReMine WH (1980) Annular pancreas. Mayo Clinic experience from 1957 to 1976 with review of the literature. Arch Surg 115:46–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stern CD (1986) A historical perspective on the discovery of the accessory duct of the pancreas, the ampulla of Vater and pancreas divisum. Gut 27:203–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Satterfield ST, McCarthy JH, Greenen JE, Hogan WJ, Venu RP, Dodds WJ, Johnson GK (1988) Clinical experience in 82 patients with pancreas divisum: preliminary results of manometry and endoscopic therapy. Pancreas 3:248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warshaw AL, Simeone J, Schapiro RH, Flavin-Warshaw B (1990) Evaluation and treatment of the dominant dorsal duct syndrome (pancreas divisum redefined). Am J Surg 159:59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Egawa N, Ishiwata J, Okamoto A (2001) A new embryologic hypothesis of annular pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 48:277–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueno E, Takada Y, Yoshida I, Toda J, Sugiura T, Toki F (1998) Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Pancreas 16:418–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ito K, koike S, Matsunaga N (2001) MR imaging of pancreatic diseases. Eur J Radiol 38:78–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugiyama M, Baba M, Atomi Y, Hanaoka H, Mizutani Y, Hachiya J (1998) Diagnosis of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction: value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Surgery 123:391–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hellerhoff KJ, Helmberger H, Rosch T, Settles MR, Link TM, Rummeny EJ (2002) Dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin administration: image quality and diagnostic accuracy. AJR 179:121–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, Delhaye M, Le Moine O, Cremer M (2001) Pancreas divisum: evaluation with secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 53:728–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Kamisawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamisawa, T., Tu, Y., Egawa, N. et al. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation. Abdom Imaging 32, 129–133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9005-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9005-3

Keywords

Navigation