Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 675–687 | Cite as

Internal fistulas in Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis

  • K. A. HerrmannEmail author
  • H. J. Michaely
  • C. J. Zech
  • J. Seiderer
  • M. F. Reiser
  • S. O. Schoenberg


Internal fistulas (IFs) and abscesses are the most common complications of Crohn disease (CD). To reliably diagnose and clearly distinguish inflammatory or fibrostenotic manifestations of CD from its complications is of paramount importance to appropriately guide therapeutic decisions. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE), a recently introduced technique for small bowel imaging, has proved a high efficacy in the depiction of luminal and extraluminal manifestations of CD and holds great promise as a powerful diagnostic tool in the comprehensive diagnostic workup of this disease. As of yet, the characteristic imaging appearance of IFs on MRE has not been described in detail. This article reviews the performance of conventional imaging techniques and the current potential of MRE in the depiction of IFs in CD. Typical imaging morphology and characteristic imaging findings of IFs on MRE are described in detail and a newly defined and highly indicative imaging finding, the “star-sign,” is presented and discussed.


Magnetic resonance imaging MR-enteroclysis Crohn disease Internal fistulas 


  1. 1.
    Oberhuber G, Stangl PC, Vogelsang H, et al. (2000) Significant association of strictures and internal fistula formation in Crohn’s disease. Virchows Arch 437:293–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenstein AJ, Sachar DB, Mann D, et al. (1987) Spontaneous free perforation and perforated abscess in 30 patients with Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg 205:72–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gasche C, Scholmerich J, Brynskov J, et al. (2000) A simple classification of Crohn’s disease: report of the Working Party for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna 1998. Inflamm Bowel Dis 6:8–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwartz DA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, et al. (2002) The natural history of fistulizing Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 122:875–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bell SJ, Williams AB, Wiesel P, et al. (2003) The clinical course of fistulating Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:1145–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parsi MA, Lashner BA, Achkar JP, et al. (2004) Type of fistula determines response to infliximab in patients with fistulous Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 99:445–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lichtenstein GR (2000) Treatment of fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 119:1132–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steinberg DM, Cooke WT, Alexander-Williams J (1973) Abscess and fistulae in Crohn’s disease. Gut 14:865–869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rankin GB, Watts HD, Melnyk CS, Kelley ML Jr (1979) National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study: extraintestinal manifestations and perianal complications. Gastroenterology 77:914–920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levy C, Tremaine WJ (2002) Management of internal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 8:106–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Givel JC, Hawker P, Allan R, et al. (1983) Entero-enteric fistula complicating Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 5:321–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michelassi F, Stella M, Balestracci T, et al. (1993) Incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of enteric and colorectal fistulae in patients with Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg 218:660–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Broe PJ, Bayless TM, Cameron JL (1982) Crohn’s disease: are enteroenteral fistulas an indication for surgery? Surgery 91:249–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maglinte DD, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM, et al. (1992) Crohn disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of enteroclysis. Radiology 184:541–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, et al. (1987) Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology 163:297–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, et al. (2003) Classification of small bowel Crohn’s subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 41:285–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Parente F, et al. (2003) Contrast radiology, computed tomography and ultrasonography in detecting internal fistulas and intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 98:1545–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gasche C, Moser G, Turetschek K, et al. (1999) Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Gut 44:112–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Umschaden HW, Gasser J (2003) MR enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 41:231–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. (2000) Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. (2001) MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics 21(Spec No):S161–S172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. (2000) MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 35:707–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. (2001) MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences. Eur Radiol 11:908–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. (2004) Assessment of Crohn’s disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 14:1017–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P (2002) MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 12:2651–2658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kelly JK, Preshaw RM (1989) Origin of fistulas in Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 11:193–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maconi G, Carsana L, Fociani P, et al. (2003) Small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease: clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic evaluation of histological features. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:749–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rohr A, Rohr D, Kuhbacher T, et al. (2002) [Radiological assessment of small bowel obstructions: Value of conventional enteroclysis and dynamic MR-enteroclysis]. Rofo 174:1158–1164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, Herrmann K, et al. (2003) [MRI in Crohn’s disease after transduodenal contrast administration using negative oral MRI contrast media]. Radiologe 43:43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nussle K, et al. (2000) MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 10:1377–1382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. (2004) Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:491–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schunk K (2002) Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:409–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. (2000) Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 25:219–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Born C, Nagel B, Leinsinger G, Reiser M (2003) [MRI with oral filling in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases]. Radiologe 43:34–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Papanikolaou N, Prassopoulos P, Grammatikakis J, et al. (2002) Optimization of a contrast medium suitable for conventional enteroclysis, MR enteroclysis, and virtual MR enteroscopy. Abdom Imaging 27:517–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, et al. (2001) Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 358:987–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sood RR, Joubert I, Franklin H, et al. (2002) Small bowel MRI: comparison of a polyethylene glycol preparation and water as oral contrast media. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:401–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Laghi A, Paolantonio P, Iafrate F, et al. (2003) MR of the small bowel with a biphasic oral contrast agent (polyethylene glycol): technical aspects and findings in patients affected by Crohn’s disease. Radiol Med (Torino) 106:18–27Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, et al. (2004) Dose optimization of mannitol solution for small bowel distension in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:648–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, et al. (2004) Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension. Eur Radiol 14:458–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Herrmann KA, Lienemann A, Holzknecht N, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis of the small bowel with MR-fluoroscopy. Presented at the 88th Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America; 2002Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rieber A, Nussle K, Reinshagen M, et al. (2002) MRI of the abdomen with positive oral contrast agents for the diagnosis of inflammatory small bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 27:394–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR 177:1325–1332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. (2002) Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 222:652–660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Herrmann KA, Michaely HJ, Zech CJ, et al. Imaging characteristic in magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MR-E) defining internal fistulae in Crohn’s disease (CD): a retrospective analysis of surgically confirmed pathology. Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America; 2004Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Herrmann KA, Zech CJ, Seiderer J, et al. (2005) The “star-sign” in magnetic-resonance enteroclysis: a characteristic finding of internal fistulae in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol in pressGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Maccioni F, Colaiacomo MC, Bruni A, et al. MRI Evaluation of Crohn’s disease. Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America; 2004Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yamamoto M, Ando T, Kanai S, et al. (1986) Enterovesical fistula due to Crohn’s disease masquerading as bladder tumor. Hinyokika Kiyo 32:1141–1143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yamamoto T, Keighley MR (2000) Enterovesical fistulas complicating Crohn’s disease: clinicopathological features and management. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bammer R, Schoenberg SO (2004) Current concepts and advances in clinical parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15:129–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Herrmann KA, Dietrich O, Michaely HJ, et al. High-resolution 3D-TrueFISP with integrated parallel imaging technique for MR-enteroclysis in patients with small bowel disease. Presented at the 13th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM); 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. A. Herrmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. J. Michaely
    • 1
  • C. J. Zech
    • 1
  • J. Seiderer
    • 2
  • M. F. Reiser
    • 1
  • S. O. Schoenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Clinical RadiologyUniversity Hospitals Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University MunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine IIUniversity Hospitals Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations