Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conventional enteroclysis with complementary MR enteroclysis: a combination of small bowel imaging

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

References

  1. Pennazio M. Small-bowel endoscopy. Endoscopy 2004;36:32–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor AC, Buttigieg RJ, McDonald IG, Desmond PV. Prospective assessment of the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of small bowel pushes enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2003;35:951–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adler DG, Knipschield M, Gostout C. A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schreyer AG, Golder S, Seitz J, Herfarth H. New diagnostic avenues in inflammatory bowel diseases. Capsule endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging and virtual enteroscopy. Dig Dis 2003;21:129–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delvaux M, Fassler I, Gay G. Clinical usefulness of the endoscopic video capsule as the initial intestinal investigation in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: validation of a diagnostic strategy based on the patient outcome after 12 months. Endoscopy 2004;36:1067–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maieron A, Hubner D, Blaha B, et al. Multicenter retrospective evaluation of capsule endoscopy in clinical routine. Endoscopy 2004;36:864–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Recent advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal, small intestinal and colonic bleeding. Med Clin North Am 2002;86:1319–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brizi MG, Minordi LM, Mirk P, et al. The state of the art of small bowel imaging: combine the old with the new. Rays 2002;27:51–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liangpunsakul S, Chadalawada V, Rex DK, et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1295–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hara AK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK, Fleishner DE. Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT. Radiology 2004;230:260–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herlinger H, Maglinte DT, Yao T. Enteroclysis. Technique and variations. In: Herlinger H, Maglinte DT, Birnbaum BA (eds). Clinical imaging of the small intestine. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1999:95–123

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horton KM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:199–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maglinte DD, Bender GN, Heitkamp DE, et al. Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:249–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, et al. Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 2004;233:338–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000;215:717–725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maglinte DT, Siegelman ES, Kelvin FM. MR enteroclysis: the future of small-bowel imaging? Radiology 2000;215:639–641

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Umschaden HW, Gasser J. MR enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:231–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, et al. Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of “sign-by-sign” correlation. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1303–1311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcos HB, Semelka RC. Evaluation of Crohn’s disease using half-Fourier RARE and gadolinium-enhanced SGE sequences: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ernst O, Asselah T, Caplan X, et al. Breath-hold fast spin echo MR imaging of Crohn’s disease. AJR 1998;170:127–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis protocol comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences. Eur Radiol 2001;11:908–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P. MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2651–2658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Herlinger HA. A modified technique for the double contrast small bowel enema. Gastrointest Radiol 1978;3:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Herlinger HA. Small bowel (section VII). In: Gore RM, Levine MS, eds. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:704–890

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gourtsoyiannis NC (ed). Radiological imaging of the small intestine. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  26. Herlinger HA, Maglinte D (eds). Clinical radiology of the small intestine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sands BE. From symptom to diagnosis: clinical distinctions among various forms of intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1518–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lomas DJ, Graves MJ. Small bowel MRI using water as a contrast medium. Br J Radiol 1999;72:994–997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:491–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maccioni F, Viscido A, Marini M, Caprilli R. MRI evaluation of Crohn’s disease of the small and large bowel with the use of negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agents. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:384–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nussle K, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1377–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rieber A, Nussle K, Reinshagen M, et al. MRI of the abdomen with positive oral contrast agents for the diagnosis of inflammatory small bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boraschi P, Braccini G, Gigoni R, et al. MR Enteroclysis using iron oxide particles (ferristene) as an endoluminal contrast agent: an open phase III trial. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1085–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Engelholm L, DeToeuf J, Herlinger H, Maglinte DD. Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. In: Herlinger H, Maglinte DD (eds). Clinical radiology of the small intestine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989:295–234

    Google Scholar 

  35. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics 2001;21:161–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Masselli G, Brizi GM, Parrella A, et al. Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 2004;29:326–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJS, et al. MR Imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR 2001;177:1325–1332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. Evaluation of Crohn’s disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:219–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern F. Development of a Crohn’s disease activity index: National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study. Gastroenterology 1976;70:439–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. Assessment of Crohn’s disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1017–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shoenut JP, Semelka RJ, Silverman R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993;17:73–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Meyers MA, McGuire PV. Spiral CT demonstration of hypervascularity in Crohn’s disease: vascular jejunization of the ileum or the comb sign. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:327–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Limberg B, Osswald B. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease by hydrocolonic sonography. Am J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1994;89:1051–57

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schwerk WB, Beck K, Raith MM, et al. A prospective evaluation of high resolution sonography in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992;4:173–82

    Google Scholar 

  45. Makanjuola D. Is it Crohn’s disease or intestinal tuberculosis? CT analysis. Eur J Radiol 1998;28:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cirillo LC, Camera L, Della Noce M, et al. Accuracy of enteroclysis in Crohn’s disease of the small bowel: a retrospective study. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1894–1898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Korman U, Cantasdemir M, Kurugoglu S, et al. Enteroclysis findings of intestinal Behcet disease: a comparative study with Crohn disease. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Antes G. [Barium examinations of the small intestine and the colon in inflammatory bowel disease.] Radiologe 2003;43:9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nagi B, Sodhi KS, Kochhar R, et al. Small bowel tuberculosis. Abdom Imaging 2004;29:335–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Suri S, Gupta S, Suri R. Computed tomography in abdominal tuberculosis. Br J Radiol 1999;72:92–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhan J, Xia ZS, Zhong YQ, et al. Clinical analysis of primary small intestinal disease: a report of 309 cases. World J Gastroenterol 20041;10:2585–2587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pekmezci S, Altinli E, Saribeyoglu K, et al. Enteroclysis-guided laparoscopic adhesiolysis in recurrent adhesive small bowel obstructions. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gill SS, Heuman DM, Mihas AA. Small intestinal neoplasms. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001;33:267–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nagi B, Verma V, Vaiphei K, et al. Primary small bowel tumors: a radiologic–pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 2001;26:474–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ipek T, Korman U, Kayabasi B, Eyuboglu E. Closed perforation of the small intestine showing continuity and the diagnostic role of enteroclysis. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:161–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Kocamustafapasa, Istanbul, 34300, Turkey

    U. Korman, S. Kurugoglu & G. Ogut

Authors
  1. U. Korman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Kurugoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Ogut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Korman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korman, U., Kurugoglu, S. & Ogut, G. Conventional enteroclysis with complementary MR enteroclysis: a combination of small bowel imaging. Abdom Imaging 30, 564–575 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-005-0331-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-005-0331-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation