Skip to main content
Log in

Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of our study was to describe the visualization, normal anatomy, and variations of the ileocecal valve with computed tomographic (CT) colonography to provide information about its optimal imaging.

Methods

We analyzed data in two- and three-dimensional rendering mode in 71 consecutive patients who underwent routine CT colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy for confirmation of the radiologic findings.

Results

Complete visualization of the ileocecal valve was better achieved in the supine than in the prone position (82% vs. 62%, respectively); the ileocecal valve appeared in 64% of cases in the supine position when it was invisible in prone position (p < 0.0001). Partial visualization of the ileocecal valve was possible in 94% of cases. The ileocecal valve was of labial type in 76%, papillary type in 21%, and lipomatous in 3% of cases. The orifice was identified in 53% of ileocecal valves; in two cases of cecal carcinoma, the normal ileocecal valve morphology was grossly disrupted.

Conciusion

The ileocecal valve was at least partly visualized by CT colonoscopy in 94% of cases, more frequently in the supine position. Its most common normal morphology is the labial type. The absence of orifice visualization alone is not a specific sign for neoplasia, but its presence helps distinguish physiologic bulging from neoplasia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RD Lockart GF Hamilton FW Fyfe (1959) Large intestine RD Lockart GF Hamilton FW Fyfe (Eds) Anatomy of the human body Faber and Faber London 524

    Google Scholar 

  2. A Shafik O El-Sibai AA Shafic (2002) ArticleTitlePhysiological assessment of the function of the ileocecal junction with evidence of ileocecal junction reflexes Med Sci Monit 8 629–635

    Google Scholar 

  3. EM Quigley SF Phillips (1983) ArticleTitleThe ileocecal valve (ileocolonic sphinter) Z Gastroenterol 2 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  4. FE Silverstein GNJ Tytgat (1998) Il tratto gastrointestinale normale FE Silverstein GNJ Tytgat (Eds) Endoscopia digestiva Mosby Italia Milan 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. KW Eu C Seow HS Goh (1994) ArticleTitleCaecal mass on barium enema study—a case for routine colonoscopy Singapore Med J 35 321–322 Occurrence Handle7997916 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FptVGjsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. OK Tawfik DH McGregor (1992) ArticleTitleLipohyperplasia of the ileocecal valve Am J Gastroenterol 87 1892–1893

    Google Scholar 

  7. AK Hara CD Johnson JE Reed (1997) ArticleTitleColorectal lesions: evaluation with CT colography Radiographics 17 1157–1168 Occurrence Handle9308108 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2svltlCjuw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P Skaane (1983) ArticleTitleRadiologic differential diagnosis of cecal tumors with special reference to polypoid filling defects in colonic contrast enema Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 138 265–275 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2008-1055724 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3s7lvFSlug%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LC El-Amin MS Levine SE Rubesin et al. (2003) ArticleTitleIleocecal valve: spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination Radiology 227 52–58 Occurrence Handle12601195 Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiol.2271020396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. HM Fenlon DP Nunes PC Schroy SuffixIII et al. (1999) ArticleTitleA comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps N Engl J Med 341 1496–1503 Occurrence Handle10559450 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199911113412003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgslCqug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M Macari AJ Megibow (2001) ArticleTitlePitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation AJR 176 137–143 Occurrence Handle11133553 Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760137 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3itlSqsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. PM Silverman FM Kevin ME Baker C Cooper (1988) ArticleTitleComputed tomography of the ileocecal region Comput Med Imaging Graph 12 293–303 Occurrence Handle3179984 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-6111(88)90040-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FivVWksw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Regge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Regge, D., Gallo, T.M., Nieddu, G. et al. Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 30, 20–25 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0225-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0225-0

Keywords

Navigation