Skip to main content
Log in

Total-body PET/CT or LAFOV PET/CT? Axial field-of-view clinical classification

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Kuhl DE. ECAT: a new computerized tomographic imaging system for positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med: Off Publ, Soc Nucl Med. 1978;19:635–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vandenberghe S, Moskal P, Karp JS. State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Physics. 2020;7:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00290-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Sachpekidis C. Long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET-CT: implementation in static and dynamic oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:3354–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06222-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Alberts I, Hünermund J-N, Prenosil G, Mingels C, Bohn KP, Viscione M, et al. Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2395–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05282-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherry SR, Jones T, Karp JS, Qi J, Moses WW, Badawi RD. Total-body PET: maximizing Sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med: Off Publ, Soc Nucl Med. 2018;59:3–12. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.184028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Conti M, Bendriem B, Casey M, Eriksson L, Jakoby B, Jones WF, et al. Performance of a high sensitivity PET scanner based on LSO panel detectors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2006;53:1136–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2006.875153.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe M, Shimizu K, Omura T, Sato N, Takahashi M, Kosugi T, et al. A high-throughput whole-body PET scanner using flat panel PS-PMTs. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2004;51:796–800. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2004.829787.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. (NCD-RisC) NRFC. 2019. https://ncdrisc.org/data-visualisations-height.html. Accessed 07/10/2023.

  9. Versluys TMM, Foley RA, Skylark WJ. The influence of leg-to-body ratio, arm-to-body ratio and intra-limb ratio on male human attractiveness. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5: 171790. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171790.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai B, Daube-Witherspoon ME, McDonald S, Werner ME, Parma MJ, Geagan MJ, et al. Performance evaluation of the PennPET explorer with expanded axial coverage. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acc722.

  11. Karp JS, Viswanath V, Geagan MJ, Muehllehner G, Pantel AR, Parma MJ, et al. PennPET explorer: design and preliminary performance of a whole-body imager. J Nucl Med : Off Publ, Soc Nucl Med. 2020;61:136–43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Calderón E, Schmidt FP, Lan W, Castaneda-Vega S, Brendlin AS, Trautwein NF, et al. Image quality and quantitative PET parameters of low-dose [18F]FDG PET in a long axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner. Diagnostics. 2023;13:3240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Prenosil GA, Sari H, Fürstner M, Afshar-Oromieh A, Shi K, Rominger A, et al. Performance characteristics of the biograph vision quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2–2018 standard. J Nucl Med : Off Publ, Soc Nucl Med. 2022;63:476–84. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sachpekidis C, Pan L, Kopp-Schneider A, Weru V, Hassel JC, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Application of the long axial field-of-view PET/CT with low-dose [18F]FDG in melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-06070-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Roya M, Mostafapour S, Mohr P, Providência L, Li Z, van Snick JH, et al. Current and future use of long axial field-of-view positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners in clinical oncology. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(21):5173. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Surti S, Pantel AR, Karp JS. Total body PET: why, how, what for? IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2020;4:283–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2020.2985403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mingels C, Weidner S, Sari H, Buesser D, Zeimpekis K, Shi K, et al. Impact of the new ultra-high sensitivity mode in a long axial field-of-view PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-023-01827-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology. 2006;238:405–22. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2382041977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozdemir S, McCook B, Klassen C. Whole-body versus routine skull base to mid-thigh (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with malignant melanoma. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020;10:47. https://doi.org/10.25259/jcis_93_2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Badawi RD, Karp JS, Nardo L, Pantel AR. Total body PET: exploring new horizons. PET Clinics. 2021;16:xvii-xviii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2020.09.005.

  21. Lan X, Younis MH, Li K, Cai W. First clinical experience of 106 cm, long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT: an elegant balance between standard axial (23 cm) and total-body (194 cm) systems. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:3755–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05505-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nardo L, Pantel AR. Oncologic applications of long axial field-of-view PET/computed tomography. PET Clin. 2021;16:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2020.09.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nadig V, Herrmann K, Mottaghy FM, Schulz V. Hybrid total-body pet scanners—current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:445–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05536-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Mingels.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mingels, C., Caobelli, F., Alavi, A. et al. Total-body PET/CT or LAFOV PET/CT? Axial field-of-view clinical classification. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 51, 951–953 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06534-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06534-4

Navigation