Skip to main content
Log in

Hematologic toxicity profile and efficacy of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 α-radioligand therapy of patients with extensive skeletal metastases of castration-resistant prostate cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Actinium-225-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ([225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617) is safe and effective in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). No study has specifically assessed its safety in patients with extensive skeletal metastases of mCRPC. We aimed to investigate the hematologic toxicity and efficacy of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 therapy in patients with extensive skeletal metastases of mCRPC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical record of patients treated with [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 for mCRPC. We included patients with a superscan pattern of skeletal metastases and those with 20 or more multifocal sites of skeletal metastases on baseline [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. We reviewed the levels of hemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC), and platelet prior to each cycle of treatment and determined the presence of impaired bone marrow function at baseline and the grade of toxicity in the hematologic parameters induced by treatment. We evaluated the predictors of hematologic toxicity using binary logistic regression analysis. We also determined the presence of renal dysfunction before or during treatment. We assessed response to treatment using prostate-specific antigen response and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 106 patients were included. Skeletal metastasis was in the superscan pattern in 34 patients (32.1%) and multifocal in 72 patients (67.9%). The median treatment cycle was 4 (range = 1–9). Ninety-eight patients (92.5%) had abnormal baseline hematologic parameters. One patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 1 (0.9%), 3 (2.8%), and 2 (1.9%) patients, respectively. Age, the number of treatment cycles, and the presence of renal dysfunction were significant predictors of hematologic toxicity. Eighty-five patients (80.2%) achieved PSA response. The median PFS and OS of the study population were 14:00 (95%CI: 8.15–19.86) months and 15.0 (95%CI: 12.8–17.2) months, respectively.

Conclusions

[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 induces a good anti-tumor effect in about 80% of patients with extensive skeletal metastases of mCRPC with a rare incidence of severe hematologic toxicity. Age, number of treatment cycles, and the presence of renal dysfunction were significant risk factors for hematologic toxicity of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data collected during the conduct of this study are included in this report.

References

  1. Pomykala KL, Czernin J, Grogan TR, Armstrong WR, Williams J, Calais J. Total-body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for bone metastases detection in prostate cancer patients: potential impact on bone scan guidelines. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:405–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. James ND, Spears M, Clarke NW, Dearnaley DP, De Bono JS, Gale J, et al. Survival with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the “docetaxel era”: data from 917 patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08, CRUK/06/019). Eur Urol. 2015;67:1028–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kesler M, Kerzhner K, Druckmann I, Kuten J, Levine C, Sarid D, et al. Staging 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in 963 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: incidence and characterization of skeletal involvement. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. Epub ahead of print on 27 December 2021.

  4. Broder MS, Gutierrez B, Cherepanov D, Linhares Y. Burden of skeletal-related events in prostate cancer: unmet need in pain improvement. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:237–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, Hansen S, Machiels JP, Kocak I, et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progression after docetaxel treatment: a randomized open-label trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1147–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, Matsubara N, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Alekseev BY, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:686–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, Loriot Y, Sternberg CN, Higano CS, et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:424–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, Fosså SD, et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rahbar K, Ahmadzadehfar H, Kratochwil C, Haberkorn U, Schafers M, Schmidt M, et al. German multicenter study investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in advanced prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:85–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmadzadehfar H, Rahbar K, Baum R, Seifert R, Kessel K, Bogemann M, et al. Prior therapies as prognostic factors of overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. A WARMTH multicentre study (the 617 trial). Eur J Nuclear Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:113–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heck MM, Tauber R, Schwaiger S, Retz M, D’Alessandria C, Maurer T, et al. Treatment outcome, toxicity, and predictive factors for radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;75:920–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khreish F, Ghazal Z, Marlowe RJ, Rosar F, Sabet A, Maus S, et al. 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Initial 254-patient results from a prospective registry (REALITY Study). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:1075–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Goh JC, et al. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:797–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sator O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Hermann K, Rahbar K, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadaghiani MS, Sheikhbahaei S, Werner RA, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Solnes LB, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and toxicities of lutetium-177-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2021;80:82–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Kratochwil C, Sathekge M, Krolicki L, Bruchertseifer F. An overview of targeted alpha therapy with 225actnium and 213bismuth. Curr Radiopharm. 2018;11:200–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Giesel FL, Weis N, Verburg FA, Mottaghy F, et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-targeted α-radiation therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1941–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Bronzel M, Apostolidis C, Weichert W, et al. Targeted α-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with 225Ac-PSMA-617: dosimetry estimate and empiric dose finding. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1624–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Hohenfellner M, Giesel FL, Haberkorn U, et al. Targeted α-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with 225Ac-PSMA-617: swimmer-plot analysis suggests efficacy regarding duration of tumor control. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:795–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sathekge M, Bruchertseifer F, Knoesen O, Reyneke F, Lawal I, Lengana T, et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced prostate cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:129–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sathekge M, Bruchertseifer F, Vorster M, Lawal IO, Knoesen O, Mahapane J, et al. Predictors of overall and disease-free survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving 225Ac-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:62–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yadav MP, Ballal S, Sahoo RK, Tripathi M, Seth A, Bal C. Efficacy and Safety of 225Ac-PSMA-617 targeted alpha therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Theranostics. 2020;23:9364–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feuerecker B, Tauber R, Knorr K, Heck M, Beheshti A, Sedl C, et al. Activity and adverse events of actinium-225-PSMA-617 in advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after failure of lutetium-177-PSMA. Eur Urol. 2021;79:343–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zacherrl MJ, Gildehaus FJ, Mittlmeier L, Boning G, Gosewisch A, Wenter V, et al. First clinical results for PSMA-targeted α-therapy using 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in advanced-mCRPC patients. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:669–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sathekge M, Bruchertseifer F, Vorster M, Lawal I, Knoesen O, Mahapane J, et al. mCRPC patients receiving 222Ac-PSMA-617 therapy in the post androgen deprivation therapy setting: response to treatment and survival analysis. J Nucl Med. Epub ahead of print on February 14, 2022.

  27. Haberkorn U, Giesel F, Morgenstern A, Kratochwil C. The future of radioligand therapy: α, β, or Both? J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1017–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawal IO, Bruchertseifer F, Vorster M, Morgenstern A, Sathekge MM. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted endoradiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30:98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawal I, Vorster M, Boshomane T, Ololade K, Ebenhan T, Sathekge M. Metastatic prostate carcinoma presenting as a superscan on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:755–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sathekge MM, Bruchertseifer F, Vorster M, Morgenstern A, Lawal IO. Global experience with PSMA-based alpha therapy in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;49:30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. National Cancer Institute – Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Available from: https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

  32. Bubley GJ, Carducci M, Dahut W, Dawson N, Daliani D, Eisenberger M, et al. Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3461–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, Higano C, Basch E, Fizazi K, et al. Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1402–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nieder C, Haukland E, Pawinski A, Dalhuag A. Anaemia and thrombocytopenia in patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sathekge MM, Bruchertseifer F, Lawal IO, Vorster M, Knoesen O, Lengana T, et al. Treatment of brain metastases of castration-resistant prostate cancer with 225Ac-PSMA-617. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1756–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maserumule LC, Mokoala KMG, Hlongwa KN, Ndlovu H, Reed JD, Ismail A, et al. Exceptional initial response of prostate cancer lung metastases to 225Ac-PSMA: A case report. Curr Probl Cancer: Case Rep. 2021;3:100038.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gafita A, Wang H, Robertson A, Armstrong WR, Zaum R, Weber M, et al. Tumour sink effect in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: myth or reality? J Nucl Med. Epub ahead of print on 28 May 2021.

  38. Gaertner FC, Halabi K, Ahmadzadehfar H, Kurpig S, Eppard E, Kotsikopoulos C, et al. Uptake of PSMA-ligand in normal tissues is dependent on tumour load in patients with prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:55094–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. van der Sar ECA, de Keizer B, Lam MGEH, Braat AJAT. Competition (‘steal’ phenomenon) between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in prostate tumour tissue versus healthy tissue. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, Ferdinandus J, Thang SP, Akhurst T, et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:825–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gafita A, Fendler WP, Hui W, Sandhu S, Weber M, Esfandiari R, et al. Efficacy and safety of 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen treatment in patients with diffuse bone marrow involvement: a multicentre retrospective study. Eur Urol. 2020;78:148–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Groener D, Baumgarten J, Haefele S, Happel C, Klimek K, Mader N, et al. Salvage radioligand therapy with repeated cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with diffuse bone marrow involvement. Cancers. 2021;13:4017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tranel J, Feng FY, St James S, Hope TA. Effect of microdistribution of alpha and beta-emitters in targeted radionuclide therapies on delivered dose in a GATE model of bone marrow. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66:035016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike M. Sathekge.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was performed per the ethical standard of our institutions and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

All patients provided informed consent to allow for the publication of their anonymized data collected during this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology—Genitourinary.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 119 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lawal, I.O., Morgenstern, A., Vorster, M. et al. Hematologic toxicity profile and efficacy of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 α-radioligand therapy of patients with extensive skeletal metastases of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49, 3581–3592 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05778-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05778-w

Keywords

Navigation